Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (20%) |
| §103 only | 4 (80%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JACOB, AJITH | 1 | 79.0% | +4.2% |
| FISCHER, JUSTIN R | 1 | 44.4% | +2.3% |
| HANSEN, JARED A | 1 | 54.4% | +44.4% |
| NERANGIS, VICKEY M | 1 | 56.3% | +28.9% |
| GROUX, JENNIFER LILA | 1 | 35.6% | +46.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19098406 | CONTENT PROCESSING METHOD AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM | JACOB, AJITH | 15d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18019391 | FRICTION ADJUSTING MATERIAL, FRICTION MATERIAL COMPOSITION, FRICTION MATERIAL, AND FRICTION MEMBER | NERANGIS, VICKEY M | 28d overdue |
| 17924232 | MODELED OBJECT AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME | GROUX, JENNIFER LILA | 26d overdue |
| 18039854 | TITANIC ACID-BASED SOLID ELECTROLYTE MATERIAL | HANSEN, JARED A | 34d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2161 | 1 |
| 1749 | 1 |
| 1723 | 1 |
| 1763 | 1 |
| 1754 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19098406 | CONTENT PROCESSING METHOD AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM | JACOB, AJITH | 2161 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 15d overdue | Pending | Apr 02, 2025 |
| 18574520 | RUBBER COMPOSITION AND TIRE | FISCHER, JUSTIN R | 1749 | §103 | Final Rejection | 12d | Pending | Dec 27, 2023 |
| 18039854 | TITANIC ACID-BASED SOLID ELECTROLYTE MATERIAL | HANSEN, JARED A | 1723 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 34d | Pending | Jun 01, 2023 |
| 18019391 | FRICTION ADJUSTING MATERIAL, FRICTION MATERIAL COMPOSITION, FRICTION MATERIAL, AND FRICTION MEMBER | NERANGIS, VICKEY M | 1763 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 28d overdue | Pending | Feb 02, 2023 |
| 17924232 | MODELED OBJECT AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME | GROUX, JENNIFER LILA | 1754 | §103 | Final Rejection | 26d overdue | Pending | Nov 09, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial