Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/575,185

DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Dec 28, 2023
Priority
Dec 16, 2021 — CN 202111545333.9 +1 more
Examiner
PETERSON, ERIK T
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
283 granted / 370 resolved
+8.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
413
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
44.4%
+4.4% vs TC avg
§102
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
§112
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 370 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION This action is responsive to the application No. 18/575,185 filed on December 28, 2023. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species I, corresponding to claims 1-11, in the reply filed on July 6, 2026, is acknowledged. Claims 12-18 and 27 are withdrawn from consideration. Information Disclosure Statement Acknowledgement is made of Applicant’s Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) form PTO-1449. The IDS has been considered Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 and 5-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kim et al. (US 2020/0211473). (Re Claim 1) Kim teaches a display panel, comprising (see Figs. 3-5 and supporting text): a base substrate (100); a fifth conductive layer located on a side of the base substrate, wherein the fifth conductive layer comprises at least one power line (power lines VDD, see Figs. 3-4); an electrode layer located on a side of the fifth conductive layer away from the base substrate, wherein the electrode layer comprises a plurality of electrode portions, at least one of the electrode portions comprises a body portion and a supplemental portion which are connected with each other, and an orthographic projection of the supplemental portion on the base substrate at least partially overlaps with an orthographic projection of a corresponding power line on the base substrate (see Figs. 4-5, electrode layer 310, 320, 330, body portions surrounded by supplemental portions, all overlapping the VDD lines); and a pixel defining layer (400) located on a side of the electrode layer away from the base substrate and comprising a plurality of pixel openings (Figs. 4-5 openings corresponding to EA1-EA3), wherein the plurality of pixel openings are arranged in one-to-one correspondence with the plurality of electrode portions, and an orthographic projection of one of the pixel opening on the base substrate overlaps with an orthographic projection of a body portion of a corresponding electrode portion on the base substrate (Figs. 3-5). (Re Claim 2) wherein: the plurality of electrode portions comprise a first electrode portion, a second electrode portion and a third electrode portion of three different colors (Figs. 3-5, first: 310 corresponding to B, second: 330 R, third: 320 G); an overlapping area between an orthographic projection of the first electrode portion on the base substrate and an orthographic projection of a power line corresponding to the first electrode portion on the base substrate is larger than an overlapping area between an orthographic projection of the second electrode portion on the base substrate and an orthographic projection of a power line corresponding to the second electrode portion on the base substrate (overlapping area of 310 is larger than the overlapping area for 330, see Fig. 4 below highlighting the overlapping regions); and the overlapping area between the orthographic projection of the first electrode portion on the base substrate and the orthographic projection of the power line corresponding to the first electrode portion on the base substrate is larger than an overlapping area between an orthographic projection of the third electrode portion on the base substrate and an orthographic projection of a power line corresponding to the third electrode portion on the base substrate (overlapping area of 310 is larger than the overlapping area of 320). PNG media_image1.png 1426 1031 media_image1.png Greyscale (Re Claim 3) wherein: the first electrode portion is a B electrode portion corresponding to a blue sub-pixel unit, the second electrode portion is an R electrode portion corresponding to a red sub-pixel unit, and the third electrode portion is a G electrode portion corresponding to a green sub-pixel unit (Figs. 3-5, first: 310 corresponding to B, second: 330 R, third: 320 G); the overlapping area between the orthographic projection of the first electrode portion on the base substrate and the orthographic projection of the power line corresponding to the first electrode portion on the base substrate is larger than the overlapping area between the orthographic projection of the second electrode portion on the base substrate and the orthographic projection of the power line corresponding to the second electrode portion on the base substrate (see Fig. 4 above); and the overlapping area between the orthographic projection of the second electrode portion on the base substrate and the orthographic projection of the power line corresponding to the second electrode portion on the base substrate is larger than the overlapping area between the orthographic projection of the third electrode portion on the base substrate and the orthographic projection of the power line corresponding to the third electrode portion on the base substrate (see Fig. 4 above). (Re Claim 5) wherein the plurality of electrode portions comprise: a plurality of R electrode portions, a plurality of G electrode portions and a plurality of B electrode portions; wherein two G electrode portions distributed along a column direction are provided between an R electrode portion and a B electrode portion which are adjacent in a row direction (see Fig. 4 below there are 2 green electrodes in a column between red and blue electrodes in adjacent columns and arranged adjacently in a row direction, columns between the dashed lines). PNG media_image2.png 1391 1545 media_image2.png Greyscale (Re Claim 6) wherein an overlapping area between an orthographic projection of the R electrode portion on the base substrate and an orthographic projection of a power line corresponding to the R electrode portion on the base substrate is S1, an area of an orthographic projection of a body portion of the R electrode portion on the base substrate is S2, and S1/S2 is larger than or equal to 0.8 and less than or equal to 1.9 (see Fig. 4 above, the body portion may be arbitrarily selected to meet this area ratio, e.g. a portion of the body portion, less than an entire area may be selected, the claim language does not preclude this treatment). (Re Claim 7) wherein an overlapping area between an orthographic projection of the G electrode portion on the base substrate and an orthographic projection of a power line corresponding to the G electrode portion on the base substrate is S3, an area of an orthographic projection of a body portion of the G electrode portion on the base substrate is S4, and S3/S4 is larger than or equal to 1 and less than or equal to 1.7 (see Fig. 4 above, the body portion may be arbitrarily selected to meet this area ratio, e.g. a portion of the body portion, less than an entire area may be selected, the claim language does not preclude this treatment). (Re Claim 8) wherein an overlapping area between an orthographic projection of the B electrode portion on the base substrate and an orthographic projection of a power line corresponding to the B electrode portion on the base substrate is S5, an area of an orthographic projection of a body portion of the B electrode portion on the base substrate is S6, and S5/S6 is larger than or equal to 1.6 and less than or equal to 2 (see Fig. 4 above, the body portion may be arbitrarily selected to meet this area ratio, e.g. a portion of the body portion, less than an entire area may be selected, the claim language does not preclude this treatment). (Re Claim 9) wherein: an area of an orthographic projection of a body portion of the R electrode portion on the base substrate is S2, an overlapping area between an orthographic projection of a supplemental portion of the R electrode portion on the base substrate and the orthographic projection of the power line corresponding to the R electrode portion on the base substrate is S7, and S7/S2 is larger than or equal to 0.04 and less than or equal to 1.14 (see Fig. 4 above, the body portion may be arbitrarily selected to meet this area ratio, e.g. a portion of the body portion, less than an entire area may be selected, the claim language does not preclude this treatment). (Re Claim 10) wherein: a supplemental portion of a G electrode portion comprises a first supplemental portion and a second supplemental portion (portions on left and right sides of G in 2nd row, 3rd column, see Fig. 4 markup below); in an R electrode portion (R in 2nd row, 2nd column,) and the G (2nd row, 3rd column) electrode portion located in a same row and adjacent columns: an orthographic projection of the first supplemental portion of the G electrode portion (portion of left side of the G,) on the base substrate is located on a side of an orthographic projection of a body portion of the G electrode portion on the base substrate facing an orthographic projection of the R electrode portion (R in column 2 on left of G) on the base substrate; an orthographic projection of the second supplemental portion (portion of right side of G) electrode portion on the base substrate is located on a side of the orthographic projection of the body portion of the G electrode portion on the base substrate facing an orthographic projection of another G electrode portion (facing the next G to the right in the array, see markup Fig. 4 below showing another G at right) on the base substrate; and an area of the orthographic projection of the body portion of the G electrode portion on the base substrate is S4, an overlapping area between an orthographic projection of the supplemental portion of the G electrode portion on the base substrate and the orthographic projection of the power line corresponding to the G electrode portion on the base substrate is S8, and S8/S4 is larger than or equal to 0.1 and less than or equal to 0.8 (the body portion may be arbitrarily selected to meet this area ratio, e.g. a portion of the body portion, less than an entire area may be selected, the claim language does not preclude this treatment). PNG media_image3.png 1393 1896 media_image3.png Greyscale (Re Claim 11) wherein: a supplemental portion of the B (from markup Fig. 4 for claim 10 above, choosing B in column 3, row 3) electrode portion comprises a third supplemental portion and a fourth supplemental portion (portions of left and right sides); in the B electrode portion and a G electrode portion (G in row 3, col 2) located in a same row and adjacent columns: an orthographic projection of the third supplemental portion of the B electrode portion on the base substrate is located on a side of an orthographic projection of a body portion of the B electrode portion on the base substrate facing an orthographic projection of the G electrode portion on the base substrate (portion of left side of B); and an orthographic projection of the fourth supplemental portion of the B electrode portion on the base substrate is located on a side the orthographic projection of the body portion of the B electrode portion on the base substrate away from the orthographic projection of the third supplemental portion of the B electrode portion on the base substrate (portion of right side of B); an area of the orthographic projection of the body portion of the B electrode portion on the base substrate is S6, an overlapping area between an orthographic projection of the supplemental portion of the B electrode portion on the base substrate and the orthographic projection of the power line corresponding to the B electrode portion on the base substrate is S9, and S9/S6 is larger than or equal to 0.1 and less than or equal to 0.5 (the body portion may be arbitrarily selected to meet this area ratio, e.g. a portion of the body portion, less than an entire area may be selected, the claim language does not preclude this treatment). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 4 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 4 is allowable for at least the reasons of “…wherein: the display panel further comprises a plurality of pixel driving circuits distributed in rows and columns, at least one of the pixel driving circuits comprises a driving transistor and a fourth transistor, and a first electrode of the fourth transistor is connected to a data line, and a second electrode of the fourth transistor is connected to a first electrode of the driving transistor; and an overlapping area between the orthographic projection of the second electrode portion on the base substrate and an orthographic projection of a data line on the base substrate is larger than an overlapping area between the orthographic projection of the third electrode portion on the base substrate and the orthographic projection of a data line on the base substrate, and the overlapping area between the orthographic projection of the third electrode portion on the base substrate and the orthographic projection of a data line on the base substrate is larger than an overlapping area between the orthographic projection of the first electrode portion on the base substrate and the orthographic projection of a data line on the base substrate.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The additional cited art teaches related display wiring layouts having anodes/pixel electrodes overlapping power lines. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERIK T. K. PETERSON whose telephone number is (571)272-3997. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 9-5 pm (CST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jessica Manno can be reached at 571-272-2339. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERIK T. K. PETERSON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 28, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745446
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF FORMING THE SAME
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12727479
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING INTEGRATED CIRCUITS FROM A SEMICONDUCTOR SUBSTRATE WAFER
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12707935
CHIP BONDING METHOD
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12672497
WAFER WITH TEST STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF DICING WAFER
4y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12660541
SURFACE PROCESSING METHOD AND PROCESSING SYSTEM
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+11.0%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 370 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month