Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/575,658

APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR GENERATING AND TRANSMITTING ULTRASONIC WAVES INTO A TARGET

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 29, 2023
Examiner
DAVIS-HOLLINGTON, OCTAVIA L
Art Unit
2855
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sedign Solutions Private Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
955 granted / 1121 resolved
+17.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1165
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
46.8%
+6.8% vs TC avg
§102
40.2%
+0.2% vs TC avg
§112
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1121 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s preliminary amendment filed 12/29/23. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings Figures 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B should be designated by a legend such as --Prior Art-- because only that which is old is illustrated. See MPEP § 608.02(g). Corrected drawings in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. The replacement sheet(s) should be labeled “Replacement Sheet” in the page header (as per 37 CFR 1.84(c)) so as not to obstruct any portion of the drawing figures. If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 – 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Skoglund et al. (WO2020/084116, hereinafter Skoglund – See IDS dated 1/26/24). Regarding claim 1, Skoglund discloses an apparatus comprising a control system 102 (See Fig. 1) that generates one or more electrical signals; a transducer assembly 103 comprising one or more transducers that receive the one or more electrical signals from the control system and convert the one or more electrical signals into the ultrasonic waves, wherein, by reducing surface mismatch, the generated ultrasonic waves are efficiently transmitted into a non-planar target in one or more directions, wherein the ultrasonic waves cause at least one of an acoustic streaming, a cavitation, a microstreaming, standing waves, a turbulence in a flow of fluids, a vibration of fluid molecules, a vibration of solids, reflection, refraction, or absorption, thereby improving efficiency of the one or more applications comprising any of, but not limited to, cleaning, imaging, mixing, measuring, sensing, or therapy (See Pg. 7, Para. 3, See Pg. 8, Para. 4 and Pg. 28, Para. 2). Regarding claim 2, the apparatus comprises a holder (base) that envelops the non-planar target and positions each of the one or more transducers around the non-planar target to enable entry of the ultrasonic waves from one or more directions into the non-planar target (See Pg. 11, Para. 6, Pg. 12, Paras. 1 and 5 and Pg. 13, Paras. 1- 3). Regarding claim 3, a surface geometry of the transducer assembly is matched with a surface geometry of a target surface in order to achieve a surface match ratio close to 1 (See Pg. 28, Para. 2). Regarding claim 4, the one or more transducers comprises one or more active elements (piezoelectric material), wherein a size of the one or more active elements is limited in order to achieve a surface match ratio close to 1 (See Pg. 7, Paras. 3 – 5 and Pg. 8, Paras. 1 – 3). Regarding claim 5, the one or more active elements are positioned on the holder that enables transmitting surfaces to contact with a target surface when the transducer assembly is combined with the non-planar target (See Pg. 7, Paras. 3 – 5 and Pg. 8, Paras. 1 – 3). Regarding claim 6, when the transducer assembly is combined with the non-planar target, the transmitting surfaces press against the target surface in order to achieve a surface match ratio close to 1 (See Pg. 7, Paras. 3 – 5 and Pg. 8, Paras. 1 – 3). Regarding claim 7, the holder functions as a base with one or more active elements bonded to the holder (See Pg. 7, Paras. 3 – 5 and Pg. 8, Paras. 1 – 3). Regarding claim 8, the holder fastens the one or more transducers to the non-planar target (See Pg. 7, Paras. 3 – 5 and Pg. 8, Paras. 1 – 3). Regarding claim 9, a target surface functions as a base with one or more active elements bonded to the target surface (See Pg. 7, Paras. 3 – 5 and Pg. 8, Paras. 1 – 3). Regarding claim 10, a control system 102 generates one or more electrical signals; a transducer assembly 103 receives and converts the one or more electrical signals into ultrasonic waves, wherein the generated ultrasonic waves are efficiently transmitted into the non-planar target in one or more directions by reducing surface mismatch, that causes at least one of an acoustic streaming, a cavitation, a microstreaming, standing waves, a turbulence in a flow of fluids, a vibration of fluid molecules, a vibration of solids, reflection, refraction, or absorption, thereby improving efficiency of the one or more applications comprising any of, but not limited to, cleaning, imaging, mixing, measuring, sensing, or therapy (See Pg. 7, Para. 3, See Pg. 8, Para. 4 and Pg. 28, Para. 2). 6. Claims 1 – 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lam et al. (8,166,823, hereinafter Lam). Regarding claim 1, Lam discloses an apparatus comprising a control system 68 (See Figs. 1 and 2) that generates one or more electrical signals; a transducer assembly 62 (See Figs. 2 and 7) comprising one or more transducers that receive the one or more electrical signals from the control system and convert the one or more electrical signals into the ultrasonic waves, wherein, by reducing surface mismatch, the generated ultrasonic waves are efficiently transmitted into a non-planar target in one or more directions, wherein the ultrasonic waves cause at least one of an acoustic streaming, a cavitation, a microstreaming, standing waves, a turbulence in a flow of fluids, a vibration of fluid molecules, a vibration of solids, reflection, refraction, or absorption, thereby improving efficiency of the one or more applications comprising any of, but not limited to, cleaning, imaging, mixing, measuring, sensing, or therapy (See Col. 6, lines 1 – 67, Col. 7, lines 1 – 27, Col. 8, lines 43 – 67 and Col. 9, lines 1 – 48). Regarding claim 2, the apparatus comprises a holder (housing) 14 (See Fig. 2) or (base) 160 (See Fig. 14) that envelops the non-planar target and positions each of the one or more transducers around the non-planar target to enable entry of the ultrasonic waves from one or more directions into the non-planar target (See Col. 5, lines 62 – 67 and Col. 11, lines 51 - 59). Regarding claim 3, a surface geometry of the transducer assembly is matched with a surface geometry of a target surface in order to achieve a surface match ratio close to 1 (See Col. 6, lines 1 – 10). Regarding claim 4, the one or more transducers comprises one or more active elements 65 (See Fig. 7), wherein a size of the one or more active elements is limited in order to achieve a surface match ratio close to 1 (See Col. 8, lines 43 – 67). Regarding claim 5, the one or more active elements are positioned on the holder that enables transmitting surfaces to contact with a target surface when the transducer assembly is combined with the non-planar target (See Figs. 2 and 7). Regarding claim 6, when the transducer assembly is combined with the non-planar target, the transmitting surfaces press against the target surface in order to achieve a surface match ratio close to 1 (See Fig. 2). Regarding claim 7, the holder functions as a base with one or more active elements 65 bonded to the holder (See Figs. 2 and 7). Regarding claim 8, the holder fastens the one or more transducers to the non-planar target (See Fig. 2). Regarding claim 9, a target surface functions as a base with one or more active elements bonded to the target surface (See Fig. 2). Regarding claim 10, a control system 68 generates one or more electrical signals; a transducer assembly 62 receives and converts the one or more electrical signals into ultrasonic waves, wherein the generated ultrasonic waves are efficiently transmitted into the non-planar target in one or more directions by reducing surface mismatch, that causes at least one of an acoustic streaming, a cavitation, a microstreaming, standing waves, a turbulence in a flow of fluids, a vibration of fluid molecules, a vibration of solids, reflection, refraction, or absorption, thereby improving efficiency of the one or more applications comprising any of, but not limited to, cleaning, imaging, mixing, measuring, sensing, or therapy (See Col. 6, lines 1 – 67, Col. 7, lines 1 – 27, Col. 8, lines 43 – 67 and Col. 9, lines 1 – 48). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. 8. Tamura et al. (11,473,908) disclose an ultrasonic inspection system. Das (2022/0176322) discloses an apparatus and method for reducing concentration polarization and membrane fouling on membrane surface in a filter unit. Tamura et al. (JP2021092477) disclose an ultrasonic inspection system. Tomoyoshi et al. (JP3604322) disclose an ultrasonic flow meter. House et al. (4,843,884) disclose a method and system for ultrasonic detection of flaws in test objects. Elsley et al. (4,307,612) disclose a method and means for ultrasonic inspection. Fathauer (4,147,059) discloses a digital liquid velocity measuring system. 9. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OCTAVIA HOLLINGTON whose telephone number is (571)272-2176. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John Breene can be reached at 5712724107. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OCTAVIA HOLLINGTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855 2/6/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 29, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12584808
TORQUE SENSOR ELEMENT AND TORQUE SENSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12571694
SENSOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING A RELATIVE ANGULAR POSITION BETWEEN SHAFT HALVES OF A ROTARY SHAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12553699
INSPECTION METHOD, MANUFACTURING METHOD AND INSPECTION SYSTEM OF DISK DRIVE SUSPENSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12553783
MAGNETOELASTIC TORQUE SENSOR WITH EXTENDED COMPENSATION FOR INTERFERENCE FIELDS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12551978
METHOD FOR DETERMINING A PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION OF A MOLDING TOOL DEVICE AS WELL AS RESHAPING APPARATUS AND COMPOSITE SHEET METAL COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+5.4%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1121 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month