Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Sedign Solutions Private Limited has 1 pending office action in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This 1 active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is located within 1 distinct art unit. This represents a concentrated prosecution profile with a single point of technical review. The use of 1 art unit suggests that the company's semiconductor innovations are being evaluated within a specific technical framework, which can simplify the management of the patenting process.
The busiest examiner, DAVIS-HOLLINGTON, OCTAVIA L, is currently managing 1 pending office action. As this is the only pending action for the company, the examiner's feedback is the primary focus of the current prosecution strategy. With 1 pending action in total, the company's immediate success in the semiconductor field depends on the outcome of this specific case. Practitioners should closely examine the past decisions of this 1 distinct examiner to better anticipate the hurdles in the current prosecution.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DAVIS-HOLLINGTON, OCTAVIA L | 1 | 85.5% | +5.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18575658 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR GENERATING AND TRANSMITTING ULTRASONIC WAVES INTO A TARGET | DAVIS-HOLLINGTON, OCTAVIA L | 9d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2855 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18575658 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR GENERATING AND TRANSMITTING ULTRASONIC WAVES INTO A TARGET | DAVIS-HOLLINGTON, OCTAVIA L | 2855 | §103 | Final Rejection | 9d overdue | Pending | Dec 29, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial