Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/577,131

AERONAUTICAL THRUSTER

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 05, 2024
Priority
Jul 06, 2021 — FR FR2107316 +1 more
Examiner
KIM, TAE JUN
Art Unit
3799
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Safran S.A.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
478 granted / 748 resolved
-6.1% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
806
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
48.3%
+8.3% vs TC avg
§102
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
§112
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 748 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6/15/2026 has been entered. Specification The substitute specification filed 6/15/2026 has been entered Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 7, 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 7 “wherein the downstream annular row comprises a first angular series of blades centered on the angular position at 3 o'clock or on the angular position at 9 o'clock and a second angular series of blades centered on the angular position at 12 o'clock or on the angular position at 6 o'clock, the average radial dimension of the blades of the first angular series being less than the average radial dimension of the blades of the second angular series” is unclear what the relationship of the italicized text and the “two blades with a minimal radial dimension which are respectively angularly positioned at the angular position at 3 o'clock and at the angular position at 9 o'clock”, “the first blade” and “the second blade” of claim 1. Applicant appears to be claiming the at least some of the same elements as in claim 1 but without specifying the relationship between the two claims. Claim 17 has analogous issues but with respect to the relationship of the italicized text and first groups of blades, second group of blades and third group of blades of claim 12. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claim 16 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claim 16 requires “wherein the blades of the at least one group of blades are arranged circumferentially contiguously in an angular sector around the longitudinal axis”. However, claim 12 already requires “the blades of each group of blades are arranged circumferentially so they are contiguous within an angular sector around the longitudinal axis” Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 3-6, 8-9, 11-15 and 18-20 are allowed. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the Examiner should be directed to TED KIM whose telephone number is 571-272-4829. The Examiner can be reached on regular business hours before 5:00 pm, Monday to Thursday and every other Friday. The fax number for the organization where this application is assigned is 571-273-8300. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Devon Kramer, can be reached at 571-272-7118. Alternate inquiries to Technology Center 3700 can be made via 571-272-3700. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center. Should you have questions on Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). General inquiries can also be directed to the Inventors Assistance Center whose telephone number is 800-786-9199. Furthermore, a variety of online resources are available at https://www.uspto.gov/patent /Ted Kim/ Telephone 571-272-4829 Primary Examiner Fax 571-273-8300 June 25, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 05, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 12, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 15, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704093
PTMS THERMAL BUS VAPOR CYCLE ARCHITECTURE
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12693018
FUEL INJECTOR AND METHODS OF USE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687136
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COOLING AN INNER WALL OF A THRUST REVERSER OF AN ENGINE OF AN AIRCRAFT
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12624836
COMBUSTOR NOZZLE, COMBUSTOR, AND GAS TURBINE INCLUDING SAME
1y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12607157
ROLL CONTROL THRUSTER AND HYBRID ROCKET COMPRISING SAME
1y 6m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+26.1%)
3y 7m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 748 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month