Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/578,636

METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING JOINED BODY

Non-Final OA §102§DP
Filed
Jan 11, 2024
Examiner
BOYD, JENNIFER A
Art Unit
1786
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Resonac Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
30%
Grant Probability
At Risk
2-3
OA Rounds
3y 10m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 30% of cases
30%
Career Allow Rate
66 granted / 217 resolved
-34.6% vs TC avg
Strong +50% interview lift
Without
With
+50.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
239
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
47.3%
+7.3% vs TC avg
§102
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
§112
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 217 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Applicant's amendments and remarks filed on October 1, 2025 have been entered and considered. In view of Applicant’s terminal disclaimers over US Patent Applications 18/573,782 and 18/723,979, all Double Patenting rejections from the previous Office Action have been withdrawn. Additionally, the amendment to claim 4 overcomes the claim objection set forth in the previous Office Action. However, upon an updated search, additional prior art has been located which is discussed below. Therefore, the indication of claims 1 – 7 as allowable is withdrawn. The invention as currently claimed is not found to be patentable for reasons herein below. Response to Arguments Applicant did not argue any merits of the previous rejection as the claims were indicated as allowable provided that the terminal disclaimers were filed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 - 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Takahashi et al. (WO2018/124215), (US2021/0129488 is relied upon as the English language equivalent). Takahashi et al. is directed to a metal-FRP composite body (Abstract). As to claims 1 - 3, Takahashi et al. teach, as shown in Figure 1, a metal-FRP composite body 100 includes a metal member 101, an FRP layer 102 as a first fiber-reinforced resin material, and a bonding resin layer 103 interposed between the metal member 101 and the FRP layer 102. The bonding resin layer 103 is a solidified product of a phenoxy resin (A) alone or a cured product of a bonding resin composition containing 50 parts by weight or more of a phenoxy resin (A) in 100 parts by weight of resin components. The bonding resin layer 103 is provided in contact with at least one side surface of the metal member 101 and firmly bonds the metal member 101 to the FRP layer 102. Here, the bonding resin layer 103 and the FRP layer 102 may be formed on both surfaces of the metal member 101. In addition, the metal member 101 may be disposed on both sides of a laminate including the bonding resin layer 103 and the FRP layer 102 therebetween [0048]. The resin in the bonding resin layer 103 and resin matrix 104 preferably is the same resin or type of resin [0051]. Takahashi et al. teach the FRP layer 102 may be molded in advance when combined with the metal member 101 or may be in a state of the FRP molding prepreg and is preferably in a latter state in which a more uniform FRP layer 102 can be formed [0050] PNG media_image1.png 210 300 media_image1.png Greyscale The Examiner equates the FRP layer 102 to Applicant’s “film containing an amorphous thermoplastic resin which is at least one of a thermoplastic epoxy resin and a phenoxy resin, as a main component”, the metal member 101 to Applicant’s “base material A” and bonding resin layer 103 to Applicant’s “resin B”. The Examiner submits that the resin containing phenoxy would inherently have a low heat of fusion, specifically less than 15 J/g or less. Takahashi et al. teach various method of producing the metal-FRP composite body which encompass Applicant’s “first joining step” and “second joining step”; see paragraphs [0088 – 0170]. As to claim 4, Takahashi et al. teach that the thermocompression temperature is not particularly limited, but it is, for example, in a range of 100° C. to 400° C., and preferably in a range of 150 to 300° C [0104]. As to claims 5 - 7, Takahashi et al. teach additional heat processes including thermocompression where the temperature is equal to or higher than a melting point of least one of the resin or the film [0108-0125]. The Examiner submits that thermocompression would be within the scope of “contact heating or “hot press” as required by the claim. [0111] Takahashi et al. teach temperatures ranging from 160 to 250 C with a pressure of 3 MPa [0111]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JENNIFER A BOYD whose telephone number is (571)272-7783. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8 am - 5 pm with alternating Fridays off. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sri Kumar can be reached at (571) 272-7769. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JENNIFER A BOYD/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §DP
Oct 01, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601107
ENVIRONMENTAL-FRIENDLY ARTIFICIAL LEATHER AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12583189
BONDING FOR HIGH-TEMPERATURE COMPOSITE APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580175
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SECONDARY BATTERY AND SECONDARY BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570070
LAYERED BODY AND LAYERING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12531315
Unit Cell And Battery Cell Including The Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
30%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+50.3%)
3y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 217 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month