Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 18/579,049

ANTENNA AND WIRELESS TERMINAL PROVIDED WITH SAME

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jan 12, 2024
Priority
Jul 13, 2021 — JP 2021-115671 +1 more
Examiner
LE, TUNG X
Art Unit
2844
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1440 granted / 1657 resolved
+18.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
1673
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
37.9%
-2.1% vs TC avg
§102
37.0%
-3.0% vs TC avg
§112
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1657 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is in response to the Applicant’s amendment submitted on November 12, 2025. In virtue of this amendment, claims 1-14 are now pending in the instant application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. As claim 1: the amended limitation of “wherein the pixel array, the camera lens, and the antenna pattern are arranged in this order in a thickness of the camera lens” renders claim indefinite since it is not clear what is the “this order” arranged in the thickness direction corresponding to the camera lens thereof. Thus, figure 2 of the instant application shows the camera lens 22, the antenna pattern 31 and the pixel array 21 not shown in the figure and therefore, the arrangement of the pixel array, the camera lens and the antenna patterns would need to described more details in figure 2 as formed on the main body 1 thereof. Claims 2-14 are also rejected under 112 second paragraph as being dependent on claim 1. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-14 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Prior art Wu et al. – US 2021/0329110 (figure 8A shows the arrangement in a thickness direction of the camera lens 811 thereof) Prior art Sakurai et al. – US 2018/0267138 (figure 2 shows the arrangement in a thickness direction of the camera lens 215 thereof) Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUNG X LE whose telephone number is (571)272-6010. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday from 10am to 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Regis Betsch can be reached at 571-270-7101. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TUNG X LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2844 January 26, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 12, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Nov 12, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Final Rejection — §112
Apr 23, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12606083
CONTROL SYSTEM FOR VEHICLE, CONTROL METHOD FOR VEHICLE, AND NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 5m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12604382
LIGHTING DEVICE HAVING MULTI-STAGE CHIP POWER SUPPLYING MECHANISM CAPABLE OF IMPROVING DRIVING EFFICIENCY
2y 1m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604378
LOAD CONTROL DEVICE FOR A LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE LIGHT SOURCE
1y 7m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592361
Hybrid High-Power And Broadband Variable Impedance Modules
3y 8m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592491
Self-Decoupling Wideband Antenna System and Terminal Device
2y 2m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+5.1%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1657 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month