Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/581,213

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 19, 2024
Examiner
WOLDEGEORGIS, ERMIAS T
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Amkor Technology Singapore Holding Pte. Ltd.
OA Round
6 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
6-7
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
526 granted / 743 resolved
+2.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
792
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
68.7%
+28.7% vs TC avg
§102
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
§112
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 743 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Claim 1-7, 10, 13 and 19 have been cancelled; claim 8, 14, 15 and 20 have been amended; and claims 8-9, 11-12, 14-18, and 20-21 are currently pending. The indicated allowability of claims 8 and 15 are withdrawn in view of the newly discovered reference(s) to Watanabe et al. Rejections based on the newly cited reference(s) follow. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed on 02/18/2026 have been acknowledged and signed copies of the PTO-1449 are attached herein. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 8, 9, 11 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bolken et al. (US 2005/0059188 A1, hereinafter “Bolken”) in view of Seo et al. (US 2015/0340397 A1, hereinafter “Seo”), Meng et al. (US 2009/0108426 A1, hereinafter “Meng”), and Watanabe et al (US 2005/0275741 A1, hereinafter “Watanabe”). In regards to claim 8, Bolken (See, for example, annotated Fig. 22A attached below) a semiconductor device, comprising: a substrate (600) comprising a top side, a bottom side, and a conductive structure (66/64/68); a body (60) over the top side of the substrate (600); an electronic component (4) over the top side of the substrate (600), wherein the electronic component (4) comprises an interface element (interface) on a top side of the electronic component (4) and a component terminal (14) on the top side of the electronic component (14), wherein the component terminal (14) is coupled with the conductive structure (66/64/68) with an internal interconnect (44); a lid (22) over the interface element (interface), and a seal (seal) between the top side of the electronic component (4) and the lid (22), wherein the component terminal (14) is external to the seal (seal); and a buffer (76) over the top side of the electronic component (4) between the seal (seal) and the component terminal (14); wherein the body (60) covers the component terminal (14), the internal interconnect (44), and the buffer (76). Bolken is silent about wherein the buffer is contained within a footprint of the electronic component. Seo discloses (See, for example, Fig. 6) the buffer (420) is contained within a footprint of the electronic component (100). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Bolken by Seo because this would help holding back the generation of diffuse reflection in the image sensor package and the flare is not generated in the image sensor package while increasing the sensitivity of the image sensor package. Furthermore, the size of the image sensor chip and the size of the image sensor package are reduced and the reliability of the image sensor package is improved. Bolken is silent about the body contacts the top side of the electronic component, and the component terminal is in the body and uncovered the buffer. Meng while disclosing a semiconductor device teaches (See, for example, Fig. 4d) the body (43) contacts the top side of the electronic component (11), and the component terminal (13) is in the body (43) and uncovered the buffer (31). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to further modify Bolken by Horoto because having the buffer would help prevent the seal from being pressed out of the buffer portions. Bolken as modified above further fails to explicitly teach that a protection film over a top side of the lid and a top side of the body. Watanabe while disclosing an image pickup device teaches (See, for example, Fig. 4) a protection film (16, See Pars [0064], [0082], and [0087], and See also Par [0085]) over a top side of the lid (14, See also , Par [0085]) and a top side of the body(15). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Bolken by Watanabe because this would help provide a high performance of light entrance, reduce the deformation caused by thermal expansion of the body, and exhibits high performance of image pickup. In regards to claim 9, Bolken discloses (See, for example, annotated Fig. 22A attached below) the buffer (76) covers a lateral side of the seal (Seal) and a lateral side of the electronic component (4). In regards to claim 11, Bolken discloses (See, for example, annotated Fig. 22A attached below) the buffer (76) covers a lateral side of the electronic component (4) and the top side of the substrate (600). In regards to claim 12, Bolken discloses (See, for example, annotated Fig. 22A attached below) the component terminal (14) and the internal interconnect (44) are in the buffer (76). Claims 15-18 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bolken in view of TU et al. (US 2019/0019834 A1, hereinafter “TU”) , Chien and Watanabe. In regards to claim 15, Bolken (See, for example, annotated Fig. 22A attached below) a semiconductor device, comprising: a substrate (600) comprising a top side, a bottom side, and a conductive structure (66/64/68); a body (60) over the top side of the substrate (600); an electronic component (4) over the top side of the substrate (600), wherein the electronic component (4) comprises an interface element (interface) on a top side of the electronic component (4) and a component terminal (14) on the top side of the electronic component (4), wherein the component terminal (14) is coupled with the conductive structure (66/64/68) with an internal interconnect (44); a lid (22) over the interface element (interface), wherein the interface element (interface) is between the top side of the electronic component (4) and the lid (22); and a buffer (76) over the top side of the substrate (600), wherein the buffer (76) is between the top side of the electronic component (4) and a bottom side of the lid (22), and the component terminal (14) and the internal interconnect (44) are in the buffer (76). Bolken is silent about wherein the electronic component is uncovered by the body, and wherein the body extends over a top side of the buffer. TU while disclosing a sensor package teaches (See, for example, Fig. 8) that the electronic component (2) is uncovered by the body (54), and wherein the body (54) extends over a top side of the buffer (53). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Bolken by TU because this would help the thermal expansion and contraction of the packaging compound generates less stress to the sensor package structure, and thus, increasing the reliability of the sensor package structure. Bolken fails to explicitly teach that the body is discreet from the substrate. Chien while disclosing image sensor packaging teaches (See, for example, Fig. 7) the body (110) is discreet from the substrate (102). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Bolken by Chien because this would help enhance flexibility and freedom in the fabrication process of the image sensor package. Furthermore, this will also reduce the damage during the fabrication of the image sensor package and improves fabrication yield. Bolken as modified above further fails to explicitly teach that a protection film over a top side of the lid and a top side of the body. Watanabe while disclosing an image pickup device teaches (See, for example, Fig. 4) a protection film (16, See Pars [0064], [0082], and [0087], and See also Par [0085]) over a top side of the lid (14, See also , Par [0085]) and a top side of the body(15). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Bolken by Watanabe because this would help provide a high performance of light entrance, reduce the deformation caused by thermal expansion of the body, and exhibits high performance of image pickup. In regards to claim 16, Bolken discloses (See, for example, annotated Fig. 22A attached below) the buffer (76) covers a lateral side of the lid (22) and a lateral side of the electronic component (4). In regards to claim 17, Bolken discloses (See, for example, annotated Fig. 22A attached below) the buffer (76) covers the top side of the substrate (600). In regards to claim 18, Bolken discloses (See, for example, annotated Fig. 22A attached below) the buffer (76) is between the electronic component (4) and the body (60). In regards to claim 21, Bolken discloses (See, for example, annotated Fig. 22A attached below) the buffer (76) is between the interface element (interface) and the component terminal (14). PNG media_image1.png 536 834 media_image1.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claims 14 and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Correspondence Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERMIAS T WOLDEGEORGIS whose telephone number is (571)270-5350. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 8 am - 5 pm E.S.T.. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Britt Hanley can be reached on 571-270-3042. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERMIAS T WOLDEGEORGIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 19, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 27, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 05, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 05, 2024
Response Filed
Dec 12, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Mar 11, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 13, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 19, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 24, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 02, 2026
Final Rejection — §103
Feb 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598902
Display Module and Display Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593457
MULTI-STATE FERROELECTRIC-RAM WITH STACKED CAPACITORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588365
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588398
TOUCH DISPLAY PANEL AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF, AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580019
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND FABRICATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

6-7
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+11.9%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 743 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month