Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/584,161

MOTOR MOVEMENT IN AN AIR HANDLER OF A CLIMATE CONTROL SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 22, 2024
Examiner
ADAMS, NATHANIEL L
Art Unit
3654
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Trane Technologies plc
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
372 granted / 519 resolved
+19.7% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
563
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
69.7%
+29.7% vs TC avg
§102
13.9%
-26.1% vs TC avg
§112
14.4%
-25.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 519 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CN 210150643 U (hereinafter “Zhou”) in view of DE 566142 C (hereinafter “Petersen”). Regarding claim 1 Zhou discloses a method of moving a motor (8) within an enclosure (par. 22) of an air handler of a climate control system, the method comprising: (a) suspending the motor (8) from a first lifting support (7) and via lifting line, the first lifting support (7) being laterally spaced from the second lifting support in the enclosure (par. 22); (d) moving the motor (8) laterally within the enclosure (par. 22) Zhou fails to teach a second portion of lifting line, or accomplishing (d) as a result of steps (b) and (c), as claimed. Petersen teaches a method of moving a load, comprising suspending the load (5) from a first lifting support (1) via a lifting line (3). Petersen further teaches suspending the load from a second lifting support (2) laterally spaced from the first lifting support (1); (b) shortening the lifting line (3) extending between a load (5) and the second lifting support (2); (c) lengthening the lifting line (3) extending between the load (5) and the first lifting support (1); and (d) moving the load (5) laterally as a result of (b) and (c) (i.e. drum 13 controls lateral movement; see paragraph 20). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to add the method of lateral motion taught by Petersen to Zhou with a reasonable expectation of success. One having ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this combination in order to allow for smoother handling of Zhou’s motor. Regarding claim 2 modified Zhou teaches the above method, and further teaches wherein the lifting line (Petersen 3) comprises a continuous lifting line that extends between the motor (Zhou 8), the first lifting support (Petersen 1), and the second lifting support (Petersen 2). Regarding claim 3 modified Zhou teaches the above method, and further teaches wherein the first lifting support (Petersen 1) comprises a first wheel and the second lifting support (Petersen 2) comprise a second wheel, wherein (b) and (c) comprise rotating the first wheel and the second wheel (i.e. the pulleys of Petersen have to rotate or there is no line motion). Regarding claim 4 modified Zhou teaches the above method, and further teaches wherein (b) and (c) comprise rotating at least one of the first wheel (Petersen 1) and the second wheel (Petersen 2) with a driver (Petersen 13). Regarding claim 5 modified Zhou teaches the above method, and further teaches wherein the continuous lifting line (Petersen 3 as applied to Zhou) comprises a chain (as per Zhou 7), and wherein at least one of the first wheel and the second wheel (Petersen 1 and 2) comprises a sprocket (as per Zhou 7). Claims 1 and 6-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhou in view of US 3,828,683 (hereinafter “Lehrer”). Regarding claim 1 Zhou discloses a method of moving a motor (8) within an enclosure (par. 22) of an air handler of a climate control system, the method comprising: (a) suspending the motor (8) from a first lifting support (7) and via lifting line, the first lifting support (7) being laterally spaced from the second lifting support in the enclosure (par. 22); (d) moving the motor (8) laterally within the enclosure (par. 22) Zhou fails to teach a second portion of lifting line, or accomplishing (d) as a result of steps (b) and (c), as claimed. Lehrer teaches a method of moving a load, comprising suspending the load (at 14) from a first lifting support (9) via a lifting line (5). Petersen further teaches suspending the load (14) from a second lifting support (guide pulley for 6) laterally spaced from the first lifting support (9); (b) shortening the lifting line (6) extending between the load (14) and the second lifting support (guide pulley for 6); (c) lengthening the lifting line (5) extending between the load (14) and the first lifting support (9); and (d) moving the load (14) laterally as a result of (b) and (c). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to add the method of lateral motion taught by Lehrer to Zhou with a reasonable expectation of success. One having ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this combination in order to allow for smoother handling of Zhou’s motor. Regarding claim 6 modified Zhou teaches the above method, and further teaches wherein the lifting line comprises a first lifting line (Lehrer 5) and a second lifting line (Lehrer 6), and wherein (a) comprises: (a1) connecting the motor (Zhou 8) to the first lifting support (Lehrer 9) with the first lifting line (Lehrer 5); and (a2) connecting the motor (Zhou 8) to the second lifting support (Lehrer, guide pulley for 6) with the second lifting line (Lehrer 6). Regarding claim 7 modified Zhou teaches the above method, and further teaches wherein either (b) or (c) further comprises changing a length of the first lifting line or the second lifting line, respectively, by use of a manual winch (i.e. per Zhou paragraph 23). Regarding claim 8 modified Zhou teaches the above method, and further teaches wherein the manual winch (i.e. per Zhou paragraph 23) is selected from the group consisting of a come-along, a chain hoist, or a ratchet. Regarding claim 9 modified Zhou teaches the above method, and further teaches wherein either (b) or (c) further comprises changing a length of the first lifting line (Lehrer 5) or the second lifting line (Lehrer 6), respectively, by use of a driver (per Zhou 7 as modified per Lehrer). Regarding claim 10 modified Zhou teaches the above method, and further teaches wherein the first lifting support (Lehrer 9) comprises a first wheel and the second lifting support (Lehrer, guide pulley for 6) comprises a second wheel, wherein (b) comprises paying the second lifting line (Lehrer 6) into the second wheel (Lehrer, pulley for 6); and wherein (c) comprises paying the first lifting line (Lehrer 5) out from the first wheel (Lehrer 9). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 13-20 are allowed. Claims 11-12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Such references show various forms of apparatus which comprise at least one similar feature to the present application. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Nathaniel L Adams whose telephone number is (571)272-4830. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-4 Pacific Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Victoria P Augustine can be reached at (313) 446-4858. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NATHANIEL L ADAMS/Examiner, Art Unit 3654
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §103
May 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673844
WELDING WIRE SPOOL WITH BREAKAWAY TAB
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12662075
PROTECTIVE SHELL FOR VEHICLE WINCH AND WINCH ASSEMBLY
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655001
VEHICLE WINCH AND VEHICLE HAVING VEHICLE WINCH
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12643764
Optical Fiber Pay-Off System and Optical Fiber Proof Test System
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12637334
MARINE CRANE AND OFFSHORE VESSEL
2y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+19.9%)
3y 0m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 519 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month