Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/584,586

GAMING DEVICE INCLUDING A HINGE ASSEMBLY FOR A DOOR

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 22, 2024
Examiner
RENWICK, REGINALD A
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
499 granted / 704 resolved
+0.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
745
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
§103
42.4%
+2.4% vs TC avg
§102
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
§112
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 704 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3, 12, 14, 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Philips (U.S. PGPUB 2024/0005725). Re claim 1, 14 and 19: Phillips discloses a gaming device (see Fig. 11, object 100) comprising: a cabinet defining an internal cavity therein (see paragraph [0006, 0007, 0040]: “the arrangement allows access to the interior volume of compartment 104 through the front opening”); a door sized to cover at least a portion of the internal cavity (see Fig. 11, object 108: panel); and a hinge assembly removably coupling the door to the cabinet, the hinge assembly comprising a hinge body, wherein the hinge body comprises a first section coupled to the cabinet by a pivot coupling and extending radially outward from the pivot coupling (see Fig. 7, object 604), the hinge body further comprising a second section connected to the first section, wherein the second section contains a slot for receiving at least a portion of the door therein (see Fig. 7, object 618). Re claim 3: Phillips discloses with respect to the gaming device of claim 1, wherein the hinge assembly rotates the door along an arc between a closed position, in which the door is positioned to contact the cabinet, and an open position, in which the door is spaced from the cabinet to provide access to the internal cavity (see Figs.9-11: the panel swings from a closed to an open position to provide access to the interior compartment). Re claim 12: Phillip discloses with respect to the gaming device of claim 1, wherein the hinge assembly further comprises: an additional hinge body pivotably coupled to the cabinet (see Fig. 6, there are two hinge bodies that consist of 303A, 303B, 304A, 304B wherein one is placed on the left side of the cabinet and the other is placed on the second side); and a hinge connection bracket coupled to the hinge body and the additional hinge body (see Fig. 6, object 304, 308, 309: many parts can be considered a bracket that links the two hinges together, include the cabinet as it, itself contains mounts (320L, 320R) for linking the two hinges together, as well as the frame (object 308) which connects the hinges as well). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Phillip in view of Gallagher (U.S. PGPUB 20210035405) Re claim 2: Phillips fails to disclose with respect to the gaming device of claim 1 further comprising a damper pivotably coupled to the hinge body and the cabinet, the damper being configured to provide a resistance force on the hinge as the door is moved from a closed position to an open position. However, Gallagher similarly discloses a hinged arrangement for raising a game cabinet panel to reveal an interior (see Fig. 6), however, Gallagher further discloses use of a dampener in the hinge assembly (see paragraph [0030]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed, to modify the game system of Phillips with the dampener of Gallagher, for the purpose of allowing the door to close more slowly which will prevent wear and tear on the cabinet. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15, 16,17, 18, and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to REGINALD A RENWICK whose telephone number is (571)270-1913. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 11am-7pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kang Hu can be reached at (571)270-1344. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. REGINALD A. RENWICK Primary Examiner Art Unit 3714 /REGINALD A RENWICK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 22, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599843
GAMEPLAY RECORDING VIDEO CREATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599832
AUTOMATIC UMPIRING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594491
THUMBSTICK ASSEMBLY WITH ADJUSTABLE DAMPING AND GAMEPAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12576307
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR GENERATING SPORTS ANALYTICS WITH A MOBILE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569773
AUTOMATED VIDEO GAME TEST BED AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+9.1%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 704 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month