Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/586,112

3D-STACKED SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE HAVING DIFFERENT CHANNEL STRUCTURES, SOURCE/DRAIN REGIONS, AND GATE STRUCTURES AT DIFFERENT LEVELS

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Feb 23, 2024
Priority
Sep 14, 2023 — provisional 63/538,401
Examiner
CRITE, ANTONIO B
Art Unit
2817
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
68%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
376 granted / 461 resolved
+13.6% vs TC avg
Minimal -13% lift
Without
With
+-13.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
484
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
54.1%
+14.1% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 461 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION This Action is responsive to the Amendment filed on 07/31/2026. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, 5-6, 13, 15, and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Fulford (US 2023/0245929). Regarding claim 1, Fulford (see, e.g., FIG. 6, FIG. 9) discloses a semiconductor device comprising: first source/drain regions 511, 513 connected through a first channel structure 514 which is controlled by a first gate structure 112 (Para 0025, Para 0033, Para 0035, Para 0036); and second source/drain regions 521, 523, respectively above the first source/drain regions 511, 513, connected through a second channel structure 524 which is controlled by a second gate structure 122 (Para 0027, Para 0037), wherein: the first gate structure 112 overlaps the first channel structure 514 in a first direction e.g., x-direction, the second gate structure 122 overlaps the second channel structure 524 in the first direction e.g., x-direction, a length d1 of the first gate structure 112 in a second direction e.g., y-direction is different from a length d2 of the second gate structure 122 in the second direction e.g., y-direction, the first channel structure 514 and the second channel structure 524 comprise different materials (Para 0033, Para 0035, Para 0037), and the first direction e.g., x-direction intersects the second direction e.g., y-direction. Regarding claim 3, Fulford (see, e.g., FIG. 6, FIG. 9) teaches the semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein a length of the first channel structure 514 in the second direction e.g., y-direction is different from a length of the second channel structure 524 in the second direction e.g., y-direction in which the first source/drain regions 511, 513 are connected and the second source/drain regions 521, 523 are connected (Para 0035, Para 0037). Regarding claim 5, Fulford (see, e.g., FIG. 6, FIG. 9) teaches the semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein a length of the first source/drain regions 511, 513 in the second direction e.g., y-direction is different from a length of the source/drain regions 521, 523 in the second direction e.g., y-direction. Regarding claim 6, Fulford (see, e.g., FIG. 6, FIG. 9) teaches the semiconductor device of claim 5, wherein the length of the first source/drain regions 511, 513 in the second direction e.g., y-direction is smaller than the length of the second source/drain regions 521, 523 in the second direction e.g., y-direction. Regarding claim 13, Fulford (see, e.g., FIG. 6, FIG. 9) discloses a semiconductor device comprising: first source/drain regions 511, 513 connected through a first channel structure 514 which is controlled by a first gate structure 112 (Para 0025, Para 0033, Para 0035, Para 0036); and second source/drain regions 521, 523, respectively above the first source/drain regions 511, 513, connected through a second channel structure 524 which is controlled by a second gate structure 122 (Para 0027, Para 0037), wherein the first gate structure 112 overlaps the first channel structure 514 in a first direction e.g., x-direction, the second gate structure 122 overlaps the second channel structure 524 in the first direction e.g., x-direction, a length d1 of the first gate structure 112 in a second direction e.g., y-direction is different from a length d2 of the second gate structure 122 in the second direction e.g., y-direction (Para 0025, Para 0027), a length of the first channel structure 514 in the second direction e.g., y-direction is different from a length of the second channel structure 524 in the second direction e.g., y-direction in which the first source/drain regions 511, 513 are connected and the second source/drain regions 521, 523 are connected (Para 0033, Para 0035, Para 0037), and the first direction e.g., x-direction intersects the second direction e.g., y-direction. Regarding claim 15, Fulford (see, e.g., FIG. 6, FIG. 9) teaches the semiconductor device of claim 13, wherein a length of the first source/drain regions 511, 513 in the second direction e.g., y-direction is different from a length of the second source/drain regions 521, 523 in the second direction e.g., y-direction. Regarding claim 21, Fulford (see, e.g., FIG. 6, FIG. 9) discloses a semiconductor device comprising: first source/drain regions 511, 513 connected through a first channel structure 514 which is controlled by a first gate structure 112 (Para 0025, Par 0033, Para 0035, Para 0036); and second source/drain regions 521, 523, respectively above the first source/drain regions 511, 513, connected through a second channel structure 524 which is controlled by a second gate structure 122 (Para 0027, Para 0037), wherein the first gate structure 112 overlaps the first channel structure 514 in a first direction e.g., x-direction, the second gate structure 122 overlaps the second channel structure 524 in the first direction e.g., x-direction, a length d1 of the first gate structure 112 in a second direction e.g., y-direction is different from a length d2 of the second gate structure 122 in the second direction e.g., y-direction in which the first source/drain regions 511, 513 are connected and the second source/drain regions 521, 523 are connected (Para 0033, Para 0035, Para 0037), and the first direction e.g., x-direction intersects the second direction e.g., y-direction. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fulford (US 2023/0245929), in view of Li (US 2024/0047455). Regarding claim 2, although Fulford shows substantial features of the claimed invention, Fulford fails to expressly teach the semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the first channel structure comprises silicon germanium (SiGe), and the second channel structure comprises silicon (Si). Li (see, e.g., FIG. 1) teaches that the first channel structure 132 (of upper FET 104A) comprises silicon germanium (SiGe), and the second channel structure 132 (of lower FET 106A) comprises silicon (Si) for the purpose of utilizing p-type material and n-type material to form p-type devices and n-type devices (Para 0030, Para 0034). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the material of the first channel structure and the material of the second channel structure of Fulford to the first channel structure comprising silicon germanium (SiGe) and the second channel structure comprising silicon (Si) for the purpose of utilizing p-type material and n-type material to form p-type devices and n-type devices (Para 0034). Regarding claim 9, Fulford (see, e.g., FIG. 6, FIG. 9) teaches the semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein a length of the first channel structure 514 in the second direction e.g., y-direction is different from a length of the second channel structure 524 in the second direction e.g., y-direction in which the first source/drain regions 511, 513 are connected and the second source/drain regions 521, 523 are connected (Para 0033, Para 0035, Para 0037). Although Fulford shows substantial features of the claimed invention, Fulford fails to expressly teach that the first channel structure comprises silicon germanium (SiGe), and the second channel structure comprises silicon (Si). Li (see, e.g., FIG. 1) teaches that the first channel structure 132 (of upper FET 104A) comprises silicon germanium (SiGe), and the second channel structure 132 (of lower FET 106A) comprises silicon (Si) for the purpose of utilizing p-type material and n-type material to form p-type devices and n-type devices (Para 0030, Para 0034). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the material of the first channel structure and the material of the second channel structure of Fulford to the first channel structure comprising silicon germanium (SiGe) and the second channel structure comprising silicon (Si) for the purpose of utilizing p-type material and n-type material to form p-type devices and n-type devices (Para 0034). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 7-8, 10-12, 14, 17-18, 20, and 22 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1, 13, and 21 have been considered but are moot because of the new ground of rejection. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTONIO CRITE whose telephone number is (571) 270-5267. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 10:00 am - 6:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kretelia Graham can be reached at (571) 272-5055. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTONIO B CRITE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2817
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 23, 2024
Application Filed
May 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 06, 2026
Interview Requested
Jul 16, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 16, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 31, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751034
DUAL-GATE SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURES FOR POWER APPLICATIONS
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745639
Apparatus And Method To Reduce The Thermal Resistance Of Semiconductor Substrates
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12740203
POLARIZER, LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE, AND LIGHT EMITTING APPARATUS
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12740201
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733303
IC PACKAGE WITH MICRO LEDS
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
68%
With Interview (-13.4%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 461 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month