Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/588,167

BATTERY AND ELECTRIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Feb 27, 2024
Priority
Mar 25, 2022 — CN 202220678825.9 +1 more
Examiner
WALLS, CYNTHIA KYUNG SOO
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
71%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
657 granted / 918 resolved
+11.6% vs TC avg
Minimal -1% lift
Without
With
+-0.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
56 currently pending
Career history
971
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
54.4%
+14.4% vs TC avg
§102
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
§112
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 918 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of figure 5 and figure 8 in the reply filed on 8/19/2026 is acknowledged. Claim 9 is dependent on a non-elected invention and is withdrawn. The traversal is on the ground(s) that there would not be a significant burden to search each invention. This is not found persuasive because to provide evidence of undue burden on the Examiner, MPEP 808.02 states that for related but distinct inventions, undue burden exist if one or more of the following can be shown: A) separate classification, b) separate status in the art if inventions are classifiable together, or c) a different field of search is shown even if the inventions are classifiable together. The Examiner notes that the groups of invention would have a different field of search is shown even if the inventions are classifiable together which meets the undue burden requirement as set forth in the MPEP. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Full consideration was given to claims 1, 2, 4, 6-8, 10-12. Priority Acknowledgement has been made of applicant’s claim for priority under 35 USC 119 (a-d). The certified copy has been filed on 5/10/2024. Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) filed 3/14/2025, 2/27/2024 has been placed in the application file and the information referred to therein has been considered. Drawings The drawings received 2/27/2024 are acceptable for examination purposes. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the second paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which applicant regards as the invention. In claim 7, wherein the battery management mechanism is provided on a surface of the first box portion farther away from the battery cell, it is unclear as to what the battery management mechanism is farther from? Correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 2, 6, 8, 11, 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen (CN 112310562, using US 2022/0021093 as translation) in view of Bitsche (US 2009/0220850). Regarding claim 1, Chen discloses a battery, comprising: a first box portion M11; a second box portion M12, wherein the first box portion and the second box portion fit together to define an accommodating space; a battery cell 1, wherein the battery cell is accommodated in the accommodating space, the battery cell is provided with an electrode terminal 111, the first box portion M11 is located above the second box portion M12. See figure 2. Regarding claim 8, the first box portion comprises a top wall and a side wall, and the battery management mechanism (the hole on the side of the first box M11) is provided on the side wall. See figure 2. Regarding claim 1, Chen does not disclose a pressure relief mechanism, the pressure relief mechanism is configured to be actuated when an internal pressure or temperature of the battery cell reaches a threshold, to release the internal pressure or high-temperature gas, an insulating liquid, the insulating liquid being provided in the accommodating space and immersing the pressure relief mechanism, wherein when the insulating liquid is provided in the accommodating space. Bitsche teaches a liquid-cooled battery having a pressure relief mechanism 13, the pressure relief mechanism 13 is configured to be actuated when an internal pressure or temperature of the battery cell reaches a threshold, to release the internal pressure or high-temperature gas [0031]. Bitsche also teaches a cooling medium, such as water and glycol mixture, to dissipate heat created in the battery [0023]. It is noted that when the weak points 13 are located at the bottom of the battery in figure 4, the weak points are immersed in the cooling liquid. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art at the time the invention was made to add a pressure relief mechanism and the cooling medium of Bitsche to the bottom of the battery of Chen, for the benefit of protecting the battery from over heating and over pressure. Regarding claim 11, Bitsche teaches an insulator 11 provided between the battery cell and the second box portion. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art at the time the invention was made to add an insulation layer of Bitsche to the battery of Chen for the benefit of keeping Chen’s cell contained from explosion. Regarding claim 1, the electrode terminal is closer to the first box portion relative to the pressure relief mechanism, it is noted that the prior art combination entails the pressure mechanism is located at the bottom of Chen’s second box portion and the terminal is closer to the first box portion. Regarding claim 2, the combination of Chen modified by Bitsche reads on when the insulating liquid is provided in the accommodating space, height of the insulating liquid in the accommodating space in a direction of gravity is smaller than height of the second box portion in the direction of gravity. Regarding claim 6, the combination of Chen and Bitsche reads on the pressure relief mechanism is provided at an end of the third wall farther away from the first box portion. Regarding claim 12, an electric device, comprising the battery according to claim 1, wherein the battery is configured to supply power to the electric device. Claims 4 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen (CN 112310562, using US 2022/0021093 as translation) in view of Bitsche (US 2009/0220850) as applied to claim 1, further in view of Hsu (US 2019/0214616). Regarding claim 4, the combination of Chen and Bitsche reads on the electrode terminal is provided on a first wall of the battery cell, the pressure relief mechanism is provided on a third wall of the battery cell, the first wall is connected to the third wall, the third wall is parallel to a first direction. Regarding claim 4, the first wall is perpendicular to the first direction, wherein when the insulating liquid is provided in the accommodating space, the first direction is parallel to the direction of gravity, Hsu teaches a first wall 10 is perpendicular to the first direction (figure 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art at the time the invention was made to form the first wall of Chen perpendicular to the first direction depending on the available space configuration of the battery application. Regarding claim 7, the battery further comprises: a battery management mechanism, wherein the battery management mechanism is provided on a surface of the first box portion farther away from the battery cell and is electrically connected to the battery, Chen has a hole on the first box portion M11. Hsu teaches external terminals on the battery box. Figure 1. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art at the time the invention was made to form external terminals of Chen through the hole on the first box portion, as taught by Hsu, for the benefit of electrically connecting the battery to an electronic device. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen (CN 112310562, using US 2022/0021093 as translation) in view of Bitsche (US 2009/0220850) as applied to claim 1, further in view of Tononishi (US 2016/0093855). Regarding claim 10, the battery further comprises: a sealing gasket, wherein the sealing gasket is provided between the first box portion and the second box portion to seal a joint between the first box portion and the second box portion. Tononishi teaches a battery container and a lid and are joined together by screws, bolts or the like with a gasket interposed therebetween [0050]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art at the time the invention was made to add a screw and a gasket to the first and second box portions, as taught by Tononishi, for the benefit for tightly fitting the first and second box portions of Chen together. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CYNTHIA KYUNG SOO WALLS whose telephone number is (571)272-8699. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F until 5pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Leong can be reached at 571-270-1292. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CYNTHIA K WALLS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1751
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12744227
FUEL CELL MEMBRANE HUMIDIFIER
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12695132
STORAGE APPARATUS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689034
NEGATIVE ACTIVE MATERIAL, ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICE THAT USES SAME, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12676383
SEPARATOR, PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF, AND SECONDARY BATTERY, BATTERY MODULE, BATTERY PACK, AND APPARATUS RELATED THERETO
3y 12m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12665258
SEPARATOR, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR AND RELATED SECONDARY BATTERY, BATTERY MODULE, BATTERY PACK AND DEVICE
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
71%
With Interview (-0.8%)
3y 5m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 918 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month