Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/588,848

THERMAL COMPRESSION BONDING WITH CONTACT AREA ADJUSTMENT

Non-Final OA §102§112§Other
Filed
Feb 27, 2024
Examiner
GAMINO, CARLOS J
Art Unit
1735
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
35%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 35% of cases
35%
Career Allowance Rate
262 granted / 743 resolved
-29.7% vs TC avg
Strong +46% interview lift
Without
With
+45.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
787
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
49.0%
+9.0% vs TC avg
§102
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
§112
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 743 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species I, claims 1-7, in the reply filed on 7/13/26 is acknowledged. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: where a claim sets forth a plurality of elements or steps, each element or step of the claim should be separated by a line indentation, 37 CFR 1.75(i). Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “wherein the at least one recessed area prevents contact of the semiconductor component with the thermal compression bonding head nozzle”. It is unclear as to how contact is prevented when figures 3 and 4 clearly show the thermal compression bonding head nozzle semiconductor component contacting area (12) contacting component (20). For the purposes of this examination, this limitation will be interpreted as “the recessed area of the thermal compression bonding head nozzle does not contact the semiconductor component”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being clearly anticipated by Seyama et al. (US 2021/0225799 A1). Regarding claim 1, Seyama discloses: An apparatus [bonding apparatus (100); figures 1, 2, 7] comprising: a thermal compression bonding head nozzle [bonding tool (20)] comprising a first region [island (23)] and a second region [base (21)] located on a first side of the thermal compression bonding head nozzle that is configured to face a semiconductor component [see figures 1 and 2], wherein the first region comprises at least one recessed area [recess (25)] surrounded by a semiconductor component contacting area [lower surface (24)], wherein the at least one recessed area prevents contact of the semiconductor component with the thermal compression bonding head nozzle [see figure 1], and wherein the second region surrounds the first region [the base surrounds the island] and has a non-semiconductor component contacting surface [lower surface (21a); figure 2]. Regarding claim 2, Seyama discloses: wherein the thermal compression bonding head nozzle has a second side [upper surface (22)] that is opposite the first side, wherein the second side is attached to a thermal compression bonding heater [heater (11)]. Regarding claim 3, Seyama discloses: wherein the first region further comprises a vacuum distribution channel [vacuum hole (30)]. Regarding claim 4, Seyama discloses: wherein the at least one recessed area is spaced apart from vacuum distribution channel by the semiconductor component contacting area [see figure 2]. Regarding claim 5, Seyama discloses: wherein the thermal compression bonding head nozzle is composed of a first thermal conductive material [bonding tool (20) is inherently made of a thermal conductive material since it must conduct heat from the heater to chip (60) in order to bond the chip]. Regarding claim 6, Seyama discloses: further comprising a second thermal conductive material [insulating material (31)] located in the at least one recessed area [figure 7], with the second thermal conductive material has a lower thermal conductivity than the first thermal conductive material [0065]. Regarding claim 7, Seyama discloses: wherein the first region of the thermal compression bonding head nozzle is vertical offset relative to the second region of the thermal compression bonding head nozzle [see figure 1]. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure; see PTO 892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CARLOS J GAMINO whose telephone number is (571)270-5826. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Keith Walker can be reached at 5712723458. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CARLOS J GAMINO/Examiner, Art Unit 1735 /KEITH WALKER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1735
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12691518
REFLOW OVEN
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686084
DEVICE FOR SETTING A SPECIFIC OPERATING POSITION OF AN APPARATUS COMPONENT AND METHOD THEREFOR
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12651880
METHOD FOR BONDING FLEXIBLE ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT ELEMENTS
4y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12649199
WEDGE BONDING TOOLS, WIRE BONDING SYSTEMS, AND RELATED METHODS
1y 4m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12629763
IRON HOLDER
2y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
35%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+45.6%)
3y 2m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 743 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month