Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/589,579

BATTERY CELL, BATTERY, AND ELECTRICAL DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 28, 2024
Priority
Feb 25, 2022 — CN 202210180826.5 +1 more
Examiner
ALBAN, FELICITY BERNARD
Art Unit
1728
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allowance Rate
17 granted / 28 resolved
-4.3% vs TC avg
Strong +46% interview lift
Without
With
+45.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
77
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
92.8%
+52.8% vs TC avg
§102
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
§112
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 28 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 2/28/2024, 7/2/02025, 10/22/2025, 06/02/2026 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Status Claim 1, 6-7 are amended. Claims 3, 5, and 8 are cancelled. Claims 1-2, 4, 6-7, 9-18 are considered on the merits. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 6-11, 13, 17-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Evergrande (CN214898768U) in view of Yang et al. (CN112952300A) hereinafter "Yang" and Asahina et al. (US 20020064708 A1) hereinafter "Asahina". Yang and Asahina cited on IDS filed 6/02/2026; Evergrande cited on IDS filed 2/28/2024. Reference is made to the enclosed machine translations. Regarding claim 1, Evergrande teaches a battery cell, comprising: a case; a first battery cell arranged inside the case, the first battery cell comprising a first main body part and a first electrode lead-out component extending from a first side of the first main body part: and a second battery cell arranged inside the case, the second battery cell comprising a second main body part and a second electrode lead-out component extending from a second side of the second main body part (Fig. 1-2 reproduced below, [0042]; [0016]); wherein the first battery cell and the second battery cell are arranged in a first direction, the first side of the first main body part and the second side of the second main body part are adjacent and arranged oppositely (Fig. 1-2; [0048]; [0063]), and the first connection surface is electrically connected to the second connection surfaces, the battery cell further comprises an adapter sheet, the adapter sheet being connected between the first connection surface and the second connection surface (Fig. 1-2 reproduced below, [0051] “connector” is considered equivalent to “adapter sheet”; [0016]) and the first electrode lead-out component comprises a first positive tab and a first negative tab, the second electrode lead-out component comprises a second positive tab and a second negative tab, the first positive tab electrically connected to the second positive tab, and the first negative tab electrically connected to the second negative tab (Fig. 1-2; [0006]; [0016]). PNG media_image1.png 570 639 media_image1.png Greyscale Evergrande does not teach where the adapter sheet comprises a first supporting portion and a second supporting portion connected to each other, the first supporting portion supports the first connection surface, the second supporting portion supports the second connection surface, and a groove is arranged between the first supporting portion and the second supporting portion, However, Asahina teaches a battery cell comprising a first and second battery cell ([0013]) each having an electrode lead-out component ([0069]). Asahina teaches an adapter sheet comprises a first supporting portion and a second supporting portion connected to each other (U-shape collector), the first supporting portion supports the first connection surface, the second supporting portion supports the second connection surface, and a groove is arranged between the first supporting portion and the second supporting portion ([0069]-[0070]; Fig. 6A-C annotated below). Asahina teaches that it is desirable to reduce the length of the lead portions in order to reduce internal resistance of the battery and reduce the volume of the cell case ([0009]; [0011]; [0058]). Asahina further teaches that by employing a U-shaped collector, the adjacent electrode plate groups are welded via only one collector, thereby allowing the highly reliable connection together with the low resistance between the cells and further the reduction of the number of parts to be employed, resulting in the reduction of manufacturing cost ([0069]). PNG media_image2.png 631 646 media_image2.png Greyscale Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to substitute the adapter taught by Evergrande with the U-shaped adapter taught by Asahina. One of ordinary skill in the art would be motivated to substitute the adapter taught by Evergrande with the U-shaped adapter taught by Asahina to reduce the length of the lead portions in order to reduce internal resistance of the battery and reduce the volume of the cell case ([0009]; [0011]; [0058]) and reduce the number of parts to be employed, resulting in the reduction of manufacturing cost ([0069]). Evergrande in view of Asahina does not teach where the first electrode lead-out component comprises a first connection surface inclined with respect to the first direction, the second electrode lead-out component comprises a second connection surface inclined with respect to the first direction. However, Yang teaches a battery cell, comprising: a case; a first battery cell (Fig. 1 element 200) arranged inside the case, the first battery cell comprising a first main body part and a first electrode lead-out component extending from a side of the first main body part (Fig. 1 element 210); and a second battery cell arranged inside the case, the second battery cell comprising a second main body part (Fig. 1 element 300) and a second electrode lead-out component (Fig. 6 element 310) extending from a side of the second main body part (Fig. 1-2 & 6, lead-out components considered equivalent to tabs; [0034]; [0045]-[0046]; [0034]); the first electrode lead-out component comprises a first connection surface inclined with respect to the first direction, the second electrode lead-out component comprises a second connection surface inclined with respect to the first direction (Fig. 1-2 & 6 reproduced below; [0034]; [0036]-[0037]). Yang teaches that electrode lead-out components (tabs) have a certain length, and due to limited internal space of a battery, the lead-out components will be inappropriately bent during the assembly process posing risks ([0035]). Yang teaches that an improved bending structure allows the electrode lead-out components (tabs) to be connected to an adapter while avoiding electrical connection between innermost tabs and the battery cell which can result in a short circuit ([0035]). PNG media_image3.png 668 569 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 760 378 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 641 439 media_image5.png Greyscale Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the electrode lead-out components taught by Evergrande in view of Asahina, such that the first electrode lead-out component comprises a first connection surface inclined with respect to the first direction, the second electrode lead-out component comprises a second connection surface inclined with respect to the first direction as taught by Yang. One of ordinary skill in the art would be motivated to modify the electrode lead-out components taught by Evergrande in view of Asahina, such that the first electrode lead-out component comprises a first connection surface inclined with respect to the first direction, the second electrode lead-out component comprises a second connection surface inclined with respect to the first direction as taught by Yang to allow the electrode lead-out components (tabs) to be connected to an adapter while avoiding electrical connection between innermost tabs and the battery cell which can result in a short circuit ([0035]). Regarding claim 2, modified Evergrande teaches the battery cell according to claim 1. Modified Evergrande further teaches wherein the first connection surface is a plane and perpendicular to the first direction; and/or the second connection surface is a plane and perpendicular to the first direction (Yang Fig. 2 annotated below; [0034]; [0036]-[0037]). PNG media_image6.png 378 760 media_image6.png Greyscale Regarding claim 4, modified Evergrande teaches the battery cell according to claim 1. Modified Evergrande does not explicitly teach wherein the adapter sheet comprises a compressible portion. However, the instant specification recites that “the compressible portion may include an elastic portion or a grooved component”. The U-shaped adapter taught by Asahina is the same as the claimed adapter structure, namely a first supporting portion and a second supporting portion connected to each other (U-shape collector), the first supporting portion supports the first connection surface, the second supporting portion supports the second connection surface, and a groove is arranged between the first supporting portion and the second supporting portion ([0069]-[0070]; Fig. 6A-C annotated below). Therefore, in light of the instant specification, the groove portion of the adapter taught by Asahina meets the limitation of a compressible portion. Regarding claim 6, modified Evergrande teaches the battery cell according to claim 1. Modified Evergrande further teaches wherein the first supporting portion comprises a first supporting surface attached to the first connection surface, and the second supporting portion comprises a second supporting surface attached to the second connection surface (Asahina [0069]-[0070]; Fig. 6A-C annotated below). PNG media_image7.png 631 719 media_image7.png Greyscale Regarding claim 7, modified Evergrande teaches the battery cell according to claim 1. Modified Evergrande further teaches wherein the first electrode lead-out component further comprises a first connecting portion extending in the first direction, the second electrode lead-out component further comprises a second connecting portion extending in the first direction (Yang Fig. 2; [0034]; [0036]-[0037]), the adapter sheet comprises a third supporting portion connected to the first supporting portion and a fourth supporting portion connected to the second supporting portion (Asahina [0069]-[0070]; Fig. 6A-C annotated below). The limitation “the third supporting portion is used for supporting the first connecting portion, and the fourth supporting portion is used for supporting the second connecting portion” is functional language. The Courts have held that if the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. See In re Casey, 152 USPQ 235 (CCPA 1967); and In re Otto, 136 USPQ 458, 459 (CCPA 1963). Asahina teaches the adapter sheet comprises a third supporting portion connected to the first supporting portion and a fourth supporting portion connected to the second supporting portion (Asahina [0069]-[0070]; Fig. 6A-C annotated below) which are capable of being used for supporting the first and second connecting portion respectively. PNG media_image8.png 631 719 media_image8.png Greyscale Regarding claim 9, modified Evergrande teaches the battery cell according to claim 1. Modified Evergrande further teaches wherein a length direction of the first battery cell is parallel to the first direction, and a length direction of the second battery cell is parallel to the first direction (Evergrande Fig. 1-2 annotated above). Regarding claim 10, Evergrande teaches the battery cell according to claim 1. Evergrande further teaches wherein the first battery cell comprises a third tab that is lead out from a third side (S3) of the first main body part opposite to the first side, the second battery cell comprises a fourth tab that is lead out from a fourth side of the second main body part opposite to the second side, and the third tab and the fourth tab have opposite polarities (Evergrande Fig. 1-2 annotated below; [0052]). PNG media_image9.png 570 641 media_image9.png Greyscale Regarding claim 11, modified Evergrande teaches the battery cell according to claim 10. Modified Evergrande further teaches where the battery further comprises a first terminal post and a second terminal post, wherein the first terminal post is electrically connected to the third tab, and the second terminal post is electrically connected to the fourth tab (Evergrande [0052] “conductive handle” is considered equivalent to terminal post). Regarding claim 13, modified Evergrande teaches the battery cell according to claim 10. Evergrande further teaches wherein the first main body part comprises a first positive electrode plate, a first negative electrode plate, and a first separator, the first positive electrode plate and the first negative electrode plate are laminated to form the first main body part, the first separator is arranged between the first positive electrode plate and the first negative electrode plate, a first end of the first positive electrode plate extends from the third side of the first main body part to form the third tab, and a first end of the first negative electrode plate is flush with the third side of the first main body part (Fig. 3 reproduced below; [0046]). Examiner notes that limitations after the word “alternatively” and “and/or” are optional. PNG media_image10.png 385 823 media_image10.png Greyscale Regarding claim 17, modified Evergrande teaches a battery, comprising the battery cell according to claim 1 ([0004]-[0005]; [0040]). Regarding claim 18, modified Evergrande teaches an electrical device, comprising the battery according to claim 17, for supplying electric energy to the electrical device ([0040]). Claim(s) 12, 14-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over modified Evergrande (CN214898768U in view of CN112952300A and US 20020064708 A1) in further view of Li et al. (CN113169401A) hereinafter "Li", cited on the IDS filed 2/28/2024. Reference is made to the enclosed machine translations. Regarding claim 12, modified Evergrande teaches the battery cell according to claim 11. Modified Evergrande is silent as to the configuration of the housing. However, Li teaches a battery cell comprising multiple stacked batteries ([0098]; [0010]; [0024]) where the casing structure comprises a first and second cover plate wherein the case is provided with a first opening and a second opening arranged oppositely in the first direction (x), the first cover plate and the second cover plate respectively close the first opening and the second opening, the first terminal post is arranged on the first cover plate, and the second terminal post is arranged on the second cover plate ([0016]; [n0101]; Fig. 9 reproduced below). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the battery taught by modified Evergrande by utilizing a housing with a first and second cover plate as taught by Li. One of ordinary skill in the art could modify the battery taught by modified Evergrande by utilizing a housing with a first and second cover plate as taught by Li with a reasonable expectation of success as a tubular casing with two end covers is known in the art as a suitable battery case structure. Regarding claim 14 and 15, modified Evergrande teaches the battery cell according to claim 11. Modified Evergrande does not teach wherein the first battery cell comprises a third positive tab and a third negative tab that are led out from a third side of the first main body part opposite to the first side, and the second battery cell comprises a fourth positive tab and a fourth negative tab that are led out from a fourth side of the second main body part opposite to the second side and is silent as to the configuration of the housing. However, Li teaches a battery cell comprising multiple stacked batteries ([0098]; [0010]; [0024]) with terminal posts extending from opposite ends of the case (Fig. 9-10; [0101]) wherein the first battery cell comprises a third positive tab and a third negative tab that are led out from a third side of the first main body part opposite to the first side, and the second battery cell comprises a fourth positive tab and a fourth negative tab that are led out from a fourth side of the second main body part opposite to the second side ([0092]; Fig. 4 reproduced below), further comprising a first terminal post, a second terminal post, wherein the first terminal post is electrically connected to the third positive tab, the third terminal post is electrically connected to the third negative tab, the second terminal post is electrically connected to the fourth positive tab and the fourth terminal post is electrically connected to the fourth negative tab ([0101]-[0102]; Fig. 11-12 reproduced below). Li teaches that having two electrode lead out components extending out of each the end faces of the housing of the battery case simplifies the parallel circuit structure between multiple batteries ([0102]). PNG media_image11.png 278 732 media_image11.png Greyscale PNG media_image12.png 369 727 media_image12.png Greyscale PNG media_image13.png 748 660 media_image13.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the battery taught by modified Evergrande to have two electrode lead out components extending out of each the end faces of the housing of the battery as taught by Li. One of ordinary skill in the art would be motivated to modify to have two electrode lead out components extending out of each the end faces of the housing of the battery as taught by Li to simplify the parallel circuit structure between multiple batteries ([0101]-[0102]). Li does not explicitly teach a third and fourth terminal post, however, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that a terminal post would be required for the additional lead-out components ([0102]-[0102]). Regarding claim 16, modified Evergrande in view of Li teaches the battery cell according to claim 15. Li further teaches a first cover plate and a second cover plate, wherein the case is provided with a first opening and a second opening arranged oppositely in the first direction, the first cover plate and the second cover plate respectively close the first opening and the second opening, both the first terminal post and the third terminal post are arranged on the first cover plate, and both the second terminal post and the fourth terminal post are arranged on the second cover plate. further comprising a first cover plate and a second cover plate, wherein the case is provided with a first opening and a second opening arranged oppositely in the first direction, the first cover plate and the second cover plate respectively close the first opening and the second opening ([0016]; [0101]; Fig. 9 reproduced below). Li does not explicitly teach wherein both the first terminal post and the third terminal post are arranged on the first cover plate, and both the second terminal post and the fourth terminal post are arranged on the second cover plate. However, Li teaches multiple (4) electrode lead-out components extending out of housing, with two at each cover plate ([0101]-[0102]; Fig. 12 shown above). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill to arrange the terminal posts as such. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FELICITY B. ALBAN whose telephone number is (703)756-5398. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:30-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Martin can be reached at 571-270-7871. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /F.B.A./Examiner, Art Unit 1728 /MATTHEW T MARTIN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1728
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 28, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12626911
CATHODE MIXTURE
3y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12603353
Battery Pack Case, and Battery Pack Including the Same
4y 3m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12573632
Anode Mixture for Secondary Battery, Anode and Secondary Battery Including the Same
3y 10m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12562385
POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL AND MAGNESIUM SECONDARY BATTERY
3y 10m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12558975
Structural Battery Comprising Cooling Channels
3y 7m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+45.6%)
3y 5m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 28 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month