Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/592,165

STRETCHABLE SENSOR ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 29, 2024
Examiner
ABOUELELA, MAY A
Art Unit
3791
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
GE Precision Healthcare LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
570 granted / 759 resolved
+5.1% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+36.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
787
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
59.1%
+19.1% vs TC avg
§102
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
§112
9.9%
-30.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 759 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 02/29/2024. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of invention (I) and species (2) drawn to claims 9-15, and withdrawn claims 1-8 and 16-20 directed to non-elected inventions and species in the reply filed on 05/12/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 9, 11, 12 and 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being obvious over Dalene et al (US 2017/0202495), in view of Ryu et al (KR 20250052835, an English translated version is relied herein). As to claims 9 and 11, Dalene teaches a wearable system (system shown in fig.1-2, abstract), comprising: a sensor (sensor 12, par.48, fig.2-12) comprised of an emitter (light source 204, par.48, fig.2) coupled to a detector (light detector 206, par.48, fig.2) via a flexible printed circuit board (PCB) (flexible circuit 202 electrically connects the light source 204 to the connector 200 and the light detectors 206, par.48, as best seen in fig.2 and 6), the flexible PCB including conductive traces (flexible circuit 202 portion of the connector includes a plurality of layers (e.g., see FIGS. 7-13), including a top electrical trace layer 212, par.1); and a material (top cover 210 and/or bottom layer 222, flexible circuit 202 portion of the connector includes a plurality of layers, par.51-52, fig.7-13) molded over the wave-shaped flexible PCB adapted to maintain a first distance between the emitter and detector when not under tension (layers 210 and/or 222 maintains the distance between emitter 204 and detector 206, as they are made from rigid/semi-rigid material, par.51-56, as best seen in fig.2-12). As to claims 9 and 11, Dalene teaches the invention substantially as claimed above, but failed to explicitly teach the circuit board is wave-shaped flexible printed circuit board. However, at the time the invention was made, it would have been an obvious matter of design choice to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to design flexible circuit 202 in a wavy shape because the Applicant has not disclosed that this wavy shape provides an advantage, is used for a particular purpose, or solves a stated problem. One of ordinary skill in the art, furthermore, would have expected PCB of Dalene’s invention and the Applicant’s invention, to perform equally well with either the straight shape flexible PCB taught by Dalene’s invention or the claimed wave-shaped flexible PCB because both flexible PCB would perform the same function of connecting the light emitter and detector in a flexible manner to be wrapped around body parts. Still, regarding claims 9 and 11, Dalene teaches the invention substantially as claimed above, but failed to explicitly teach the material is made from elastic material to maintain a first distance between the emitter and detector when not under tension, wherein tension increases the first distance to a second distance. Nevertheless, Ryu teaches an analogous bio-sensor, such as, such as a photoplethysmography (PPG) sensor (300, abstract, page 5, sec.13, fg.3), wherein sensor modules are connected via a bridge, and each bridge may include a flexible circuit board and an outer shell. The outer shell may include a soft material (e.g., an elastomer) that surrounds the flexible circuit board. Ino ther words, the bridge may be bendable because it includes soft components (page 5, sec.14, fg.3), to maintain a first distance between the emitter and detector when not under tension, wherein tension increases the first distance to a second distance (the characteristics of the elastic material would inherently maintain the distance between the sensors when not in tension, and increase the distance between the sensors when in tension). Since elastic material molded and/or covering flexible PCB is well-known in the art, so it would have been obvious to one having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to include elastic material, and/or make top/bottom layers covering PCB taught by Dalene’s invention, from an elastic material, as taught by Ryu’s invention to be softer while bending and/or wrapping around body parts. As to claim 12, Dalene teaches the wearable system, wherein the emitter and the detector are electrically coupled to each other by the conductive traces (emitter 204 and detector 206 are connected to tracers 212, par.54-55, as best seen in fig.6, 9 and 10), where there are no other electric couplers than the conductive traces therebetween (as best seen in fig.6, 9 and 10, there are no other electric traces between 204 and 206). As to claim 14, Dalene teaches the wearable system, wherein the emitter is a light emitting diode (light sources 204 (e.g. LEDs), par.47) and the detector is a photodetector (light detectors 206 (e.g., photodiodes), par.47). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAY A ABOUELELA whose telephone number is (571)270-7917. The examiner can normally be reached 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JACQUELINE CHENG can be reached at 5712725596. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MAY A ABOUELELA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3791
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 29, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12661064
BODY MOTION SENSOR, PROGRAM, AND INFORMATION PRESENTATION SYSTEM
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12660997
System and Method for Dynamic Optical Contrast Imaging
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661014
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12635673
SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING A WALKED DISTANCE OF AN ANIMAL WITHIN A BARN
2y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629139
BIOPSY ARRANGEMENTS
4y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+36.5%)
3y 1m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 759 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month