Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/595,717

BACKSIDE POWER DISTRIBUTION NETWORK

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 05, 2024
Examiner
SARKER-NAG, AKHEE
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
58 granted / 71 resolved
+13.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
103
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
65.6%
+25.6% vs TC avg
§102
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
§112
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 71 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traversing Group 1 Species I and Group 2, Species A directed to claims 1-3, 6, 11-13, 16 and 20 in the reply filed on 08/11/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 4-5, 7-10, 14-15 and 17-19 are directed towards non-elected species thereby withdrawn. No claims are cancelled. No claims were amended. No claims were added. As a result, claims 1-20 are currently pending. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 03/05/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner and made of record. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2, 6, 12, 16 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rubin, Joshua M. (US 20200135646 A1) “Rubin et al.” in view of Lanzillo; Nicholas Anthony (US 20220406717 A1) “Lanzillo et al.”. Regarding Independent Claim 1, Rubin et al. Figs. 1, 3-5, 10, 17 discloses a semiconductor structure (“a monolithic 3D semiconductor integrated circuit device 10” ¶ [0036]), comprising: a backside interconnect (“a backside power distribution plane” ¶ [0069]) comprising a first metal layer and a second metal layer disposed on the first metal layer (“at least two stacked metallization layers wherein a first metallization layer comprises an array of parallel metal lines that extend in one direction (e.g., X-direction) and wherein a second metallization layer comprises an array of parallel metal lines that extend in another direction (e.g., Y-direction) orthogonal to the metal lines of the first metallization layer.” ¶ [0058]; “The BEOL layer comprises an interconnect structure, which comprises multiple levels of metal lines” ¶ [0041]), the first metal layer comprising a first Vdd metal line and a first Vss metal line (“the first and second metallization layers each comprise alternating VDD and GND metal lines” ¶ [0058]), and the second metal layer comprising a second Vdd metal line and a second Vss metal line (“the first and second metallization layers each comprise alternating VDD and GND metal lines” ¶ [0058]); wherein the first Vss metal line is in contact with the second Vss metal line (“the GND lines of the first and second metallization layers are connected using vertical vias” ¶ [0058]); and second Vss metal line is isolated from the first Vdd metal line (Fig. 1 shows GND line is isolated from Vdd line by dielectric) However, Rubin et al. does not disclose, wherein the second Vss metal line is isolated from the first Vdd metal line by a non-conductive liner. In the similar field of endeavor of semiconductor structure with one or more backside metal layers Lanzillo et al. Figs. 1, 4 and 11 discloses wherein the second Vss metal line is isolated from the first Vdd metal line by a non-conductive liner (“Dielectric material 30 will separate metal 20 forming the power and ground lines from the floating metal formed in later process steps.” ¶ [0073]). It would have been obvious to person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date to modify the Vdd and Vss lines of Rubin et al. by including a dielectric liner of Lanzillo et al. in order to provide increased capacitance to stabilize current flow to backside power lines is desirable. Furthermore, embodiments of the present invention recognize that decoupling capacitance in the backside metal layers of the power delivery network reduces power supply noise (Lanzillo et al., ¶ [0032]). Regarding Claim 2, Rubin et al. as modified by Lanzillo et al. discloses the limitations of claim 1. Rubin et al. further discloses, wherein the first Vdd metal line is in contact with the second Vdd metal line (“the VDD lines of the first and second metallization layers are connected using vertical vias” ¶ [0058]). Regarding Claim 6, Rubin et al. as modified by Lanzillo et al. discloses the limitations of claim 1. Rubin et al. Fig. 16A further discloses, wherein an interface between the first metal layer and the second metal layer is a uniform surface (“a CMP process to remove the overburden insulating material and planarize the surface” ¶ [0089]). Regarding Independent Claim 12, Rubin et al. Figs. 1, 3-5, 10, 17 discloses a semiconductor structure (“a monolithic 3D semiconductor integrated circuit device 10” ¶ [0036]), comprising: a backside interconnect (“a backside power distribution plane” ¶ [0069]) comprising a first metal layer and a second metal layer disposed on the first metal layer (“at least two stacked metallization layers wherein a first metallization layer comprises an array of parallel metal lines that extend in one direction (e.g., X-direction) and wherein a second metallization layer comprises an array of parallel metal lines that extend in another direction (e.g., Y-direction) orthogonal to the metal lines of the first metallization layer.” ¶ [0058]; “The BEOL layer comprises an interconnect structure, which comprises multiple levels of metal lines” ¶ [0041]), the first metal layer comprising a first Vdd metal line (“the first and second metallization layers each comprise alternating VDD and GND metal lines” ¶ [0058]), and the second metal layer comprising a second Vdd metal line and a Vss metal line (“the first and second metallization layers each comprise alternating VDD and GND metal lines” ¶ [0058]); wherein the first Vdd metal line is in contact with the second Vdd metal line (“the VDD lines of the first and second metallization layers are connected using vertical vias” ¶ [0058]); and Vss metal line is isolated from the Vdd metal line (Fig. 1 shows GND line is isolated from Vdd line by dielectric). However, Rubin et al. does not disclose, wherein the first Vdd metal line is isolated from the Vss metal line by a non-conductive liner. In the similar field of endeavor of semiconductor structure with one or more backside metal layers Lanzillo et al. Figs. 1, 4 and 11 discloses wherein the first Vdd metal line is isolated from the Vss metal line by a non-conductive liner (“Dielectric material 30 will separate metal 20 forming the power and ground lines from the floating metal formed in later process steps.” ¶ [0073]). It would have been obvious to person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date to modify the Vdd and Vss lines of Rubin et al. by including a dielectric liner of Lanzillo et al. in order to provide increased capacitance to stabilize current flow to backside power lines is desirable. Furthermore, embodiments of the present invention recognize that decoupling capacitance in the backside metal layers of the power delivery network reduces power supply noise (Lanzillo et al., ¶ [0032]). Regarding Claim 16, Rubin et al. as modified by Lanzillo et al. discloses the limitations of claim 12. Rubin et al. Fig. 16A further discloses, wherein an interface between the first metal layer and the second metal layer is a uniform surface (“a CMP process to remove the overburden insulating material and planarize the surface” ¶ [0089]). Regarding Independent Claim 20, Rubin et al. Figs. 1, 3-5, 10, 17 discloses an integrated circuit (“a monolithic 3D semiconductor integrated circuit device 10” ¶ [0036]), comprising: one or more semiconductor structures, wherein at least one of the one or more semiconductor structures comprises: a backside interconnect (“a backside power distribution plane” ¶ [0069]) comprising a first metal layer and a second metal layer disposed on the first metal layer (“at least two stacked metallization layers wherein a first metallization layer comprises an array of parallel metal lines that extend in one direction (e.g., X-direction) and wherein a second metallization layer comprises an array of parallel metal lines that extend in another direction (e.g., Y-direction) orthogonal to the metal lines of the first metallization layer.” ¶ [0058]; “The BEOL layer comprises an interconnect structure, which comprises multiple levels of metal lines” ¶ [0041]), the first metal layer comprising a first Vdd metal line and a first Vss metal line (“the first and second metallization layers each comprise alternating VDD and GND metal lines” ¶ [0058]), and the second metal layer comprising a second Vdd metal line and a second Vss metal line (“the first and second metallization layers each comprise alternating VDD and GND metal lines” ¶ [0058]); wherein the first Vss metal line is in contact with the second Vss metal line (“the GND lines of the first and second metallization layers are connected using vertical vias” ¶ [0058]); and second Vss metal line is isolated from the first Vdd metal line (Fig. 1 shows GND line is isolated from Vdd line by dielectric) However, Rubin et al. does not disclose, wherein the second Vss metal line is isolated from the first Vdd metal line by a non-conductive liner. In the similar field of endeavor of semiconductor structure with one or more backside metal layers Lanzillo et al. Figs. 1, 4 and 11 discloses wherein the second Vss metal line is isolated from the first Vdd metal line by a non-conductive liner (“Dielectric material 30 will separate metal 20 forming the power and ground lines from the floating metal formed in later process steps.” ¶ [0073]). It would have been obvious to person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date to modify the Vdd and Vss lines of Rubin et al. by including a dielectric liner of Lanzillo et al. in order to provide increased capacitance to stabilize current flow to backside power lines is desirable. Furthermore, embodiments of the present invention recognize that decoupling capacitance in the backside metal layers of the power delivery network reduces power supply noise (Lanzillo et al., ¶ [0032]). Claims 3, and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rubin, Joshua M. (US 20200135646 A1) “Rubin et al.” in view of Lanzillo; Nicholas Anthony (US 20220406717 A1) “Lanzillo et al.” further in view of Huang; Lin-Yu (US 20230369401 A1) “Huang et al.”. Regarding Claim 3, Rubin et al. as modified by Lanzillo et al. discloses the limitations of claim 1. However, Rubin et al. does not disclose, wherein the non-conductive liner comprises a dielectric material comprising SiN and HfO2. In the similar field of endeavor of semiconductor structure with one or more backside metal layers Lanzillo et al. Figs. 1, 4 and 11 discloses, wherein the non-conductive liner comprises a dielectric material comprising HfO2 (“dielectric material 30 can be, but is not limited to a hafnium oxide material (e.g., HfO.sub.2)” ¶ [0072]). It would have been obvious to person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date to modify the Vdd and Vss lines of Rubin et al. by including a dielectric liner of Lanzillo et al. in order to provide increased capacitance to stabilize current flow to backside power lines is desirable. Furthermore, embodiments of the present invention recognize that decoupling capacitance in the backside metal layers of the power delivery network reduces power supply noise (Lanzillo et al., ¶ [0032]). However, Lanzillo et al. does not disclose, wherein the non-conductive liner comprises a dielectric material comprising SiN and HfO2. In the similar field of endeavor of semiconductor structure with one or more backside metal layers Huang et al. discloses, wherein the non-conductive liner (“a dielectric liner layer 304 on the backside of the structure 200.” ¶ [0037]) comprises a dielectric material comprising SiN and HfO2 (“the dielectric liner layer 304 may include …. HfO.sub.2, Si.sub.3N.sub.4, or other suitable material(s).” ¶ [0037]). It would have been obvious to person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date to modify the Vdd and Vss lines of Rubin et al. as modified by Lanzillo et al. by including a dielectric liner of Huang et al. because the selection of a high k dielectric material for dielectric material can provide increase capacitance in the completed semiconductor chip (Lanzillo et al., ¶ [0073]). Regarding Claim 13, Rubin et al. as modified by Lanzillo et al. discloses the limitations of claim 12. However, Rubin et al. does not disclose, wherein the non-conductive liner comprises a dielectric material comprising SiN and HfO2. In the similar field of endeavor of semiconductor structure with one or more backside metal layers Lanzillo et al. Figs. 1, 4 and 11 discloses, wherein the non-conductive liner comprises a dielectric material comprising HfO2 (“dielectric material 30 can be, but is not limited to a hafnium oxide material (e.g., HfO.sub.2)” ¶ [0072]). It would have been obvious to person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date to modify the Vdd and Vss lines of Rubin et al. by including a dielectric liner of Lanzillo et al. in order to provide increased capacitance to stabilize current flow to backside power lines is desirable. Furthermore, embodiments of the present invention recognize that decoupling capacitance in the backside metal layers of the power delivery network reduces power supply noise (Lanzillo et al., ¶ [0032]). However, Lanzillo et al. does not disclose, wherein the non-conductive liner comprises a dielectric material comprising SiN and HfO2. In the similar field of endeavor of semiconductor structure with one or more backside metal layers Huang et al. discloses, wherein the non-conductive liner (“a dielectric liner layer 304 on the backside of the structure 200.” ¶ [0037]) comprises a dielectric material comprising SiN and HfO2 (“the dielectric liner layer 304 may include …. HfO.sub.2, Si.sub.3N.sub.4, or other suitable material(s).” ¶ [0037]). It would have been obvious to person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date to modify the Vdd and Vss lines of Rubin et al. as modified by Lanzillo et al. by including a dielectric liner of Huang et al. because the selection of a high k dielectric material for dielectric material can provide increase capacitance in the completed semiconductor chip (Lanzillo et al., ¶ [0073]). Claims 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rubin, Joshua M. (US 20200135646 A1) “Rubin et al.” in view of Lanzillo; Nicholas Anthony (US 20220406717 A1) “Lanzillo et al.” further in view of ZHU; John Jianhong (US 20210217699 A1) “ZHU et al.”. Regarding Claim 11, Rubin et al. as modified by Lanzillo et al. discloses the limitations of claim 2. Rubin et al. further discloses, wherein a TaN or a TiN liner layer is disposed between the metal lines (“The MOL contacts C1, C2, and C3 (and horizontal interconnect wiring) may comprise metallic fill material including, but not limited to, tungsten, cobalt, ruthenium, copper, or combinations thereof, as well as thin liner layers (e.g., titanium nitride (TiN) and/or tantalum nitride (TaN) barrier layer and/or seed layer) which are formed prior to depositing the metallic fill material.” ¶ [0038]). However, Rubin et al. does not disclose, wherein a TaN or a TiN liner layer is disposed between the first Vdd metal line and the second Vdd metal line. In the similar field of endeavor of semiconductor structure with one or more backside metal layers ZHU et al. discloses, wherein a TaN or a TiN liner layer (“the barrier layer 240 may include at least one of tantalum (Ta), tantalum nitride (TaN), titanium nitride (TiN), or titanium-tungsten (TiW).” ¶ [0045]) is disposed between the first Vdd metal line and the second Vdd metal line (“the power rail 128 includes a first conductive layer 238, a barrier layer 240, and a second conductive layer 242. The barrier layer 240 is disposed between the first conductive layer 238 and second conductive layer 242.” ¶ [0044]). It would have been obvious to person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date to modify the Vdd lines of Rubin et al. as modified by Lanzillo et al. by including a dielectric liner of ZHU et al. in order to serve as a seed layer when forming or depositing the second conductive layer (ZHU et al., ¶ [0045]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AKHEE SARKER-NAG whose telephone number is (703)756-4655. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:15 AM to 5:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, YARA J. GREEN can be reached at (571) 270-3035. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AKHEE SARKER-NAG/Examiner, Art Unit 2893 /YARA B GREEN/Supervisor Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 05, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740104
Methods For Forming Gate Structures
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12727242
BACKSIDE PROGRAMMABLE GATE ARRAY
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12701977
METHOD FOR FORMING A CONTACT PLUG WITH IMPROVED CONTACT METAL SEALING
4y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696560
LINER LAYER ALONG ABSORPTION STRUCTURE OF IR SENSOR
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12690360
DISPLAY MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+12.5%)
3y 5m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 71 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month