Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/596,664

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 06, 2024
Priority
Mar 27, 2023 — JP 2023-049865
Examiner
LIU, XIAOMING
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
527 granted / 609 resolved
+18.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
638
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
64.6%
+24.6% vs TC avg
§102
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
§112
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 609 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-4 in the reply filed on 7/1/2026 is acknowledged. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 3/6/2024. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tanaka US 2019/0296148 in view of Nunotani et al. US 2021/0066130. PNG media_image1.png 759 1266 media_image1.png Greyscale Re claim 1, Tanaka teaches a semiconductor device (fig1-4) comprising: a conductive layer (22, fig3, [34]); a semiconductor portion (10, fig3, [34]) provided on the conductive layer (22, fig3, [34]); a first source electrode (20a, fig3, [34]) provided on the semiconductor portion (10, fig3, [34]); a second source electrode (20b, fig3, [34]) provided on the semiconductor portion (10, fig3, [34]) and provided away from the first source electrode (20a, fig3, [34]); a first control electrode (26a with gate insulating film 28a around, fig3, [34]) that is provided on the semiconductor portion (10, fig3, [34]) and that is electrically isolated from the first source electrode (20a, fig3, [34]) and the second source electrode (20b, fig3, [34]); and a second control electrode (26b with gate insulating film 28b around, fig3, [34]) that is provided on the semiconductor portion (10, fig3, [34]) and that is electrically isolated from the first source electrode (20a, fig3, [34]), the second source electrode (20b, fig3, [34]), and the first control electrode (26a, fig3, [34]), the semiconductor portion (10, fig3, [34]) including a first semiconductor region (30, 32, fig3, [34]) of a first conductivity type (n-type, fig3, [50]) provided on the conductive layer (22, fig3, [34]), a second semiconductor region (34a, fig3, [34]) of a second conductivity type (p-type, fig3, [51]) provided on the first semiconductor region, a third semiconductor region (34b, fig3, [34]) of the second conductivity type (p-type, fig3, [51]) provided on the first semiconductor region (30, 32, fig3, [34]) and provided away from the second semiconductor region (34a, fig3, [34]), a fourth semiconductor region (36a, fig3, [34]) of the first conductivity type (n-type, fig3, [51]) provided on the second semiconductor region (34a, fig3, [34]), and a fifth semiconductor region (36b, fig3, [34]) of the first conductivity type (n-type, fig3, [51]) provided on the third semiconductor region (34b, fig3, [34]), the first source electrode (20a, fig3, [34]) being electrically connected to the second semiconductor region (34a, fig3, [34]) and the fourth semiconductor region (36a, fig3, [34]), the second source electrode (20b, fig3, [34]) being electrically connected to the third semiconductor region (34b, fig3, [34]) and the fifth semiconductor region (36b, fig3, [34]), the first control electrode (26a, fig3, [34]) facing the first semiconductor region (30, 32, fig3, [34]), the second semiconductor region (34a, fig3, [34]), and the fourth semiconductor region (36a, fig3, [34]) via a first insulating film (28a, fig3, [34]), the second control electrode (26b, fig3, [34]) facing the first semiconductor region (30, 32, fig3, [34]), the third semiconductor region (34b, fig3, [34]), and the fifth semiconductor region (36b, fig3, [34]) via a second insulating film (28b, fig3, [34]), and in a plan view (fig1). Tanaka does not explicitly show a first end portion of the conductive layer being located inside a second end portion of the semiconductor portion, and an outer periphery formed by the first end portion surrounding both at least a part of a third end portion of a first element region including the second semiconductor region and at least a part of a fourth end portion of a second element region including the third semiconductor region. Nunotani teaches a first end portion of the conductive layer (region of 20 around CG, fig8A, [47]) being located inside a second end portion of the semiconductor portion (region of 17 around CG and side of 13, fig8A, [47]), It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teaching of Tanaka and Nunotani to form a groove CG in the dicing region. The motivation to do so is to prevent chipping and cracking during the dicing process (Nunotani, [52]) and prevent solder from creeping upward during bonding process (Nunotani, [45]). Tanaka in view of Nunotani teaches an outer periphery (Tanaka, region of 30 and 22 formed with CG, fig3) formed by the first end portion (Tanaka, region 22 formed with CG, fig8A, [47]) surrounding both at least a part of a third end portion (Tanaka, part of p type 34a in contact with 38, fig3) of a first element region including the second semiconductor region (Tanaka, 34a, fig3, [34]) and at least a part of a fourth end portion (Tanaka, part of p type 34b in contact with 38, fig3) of a second element region including the third semiconductor region (Tanaka, 34b, fig3, [34]). Re claim 2, Tanaka in view of Nunotani teaches the device according to claim 1, wherein the first end portion (Tanaka, side of 22 with CG, fig3) is located outside the third end portion (Tanaka, part of p type 34a in contact with 38, fig3) and outside the fourth end portion (Tanaka, part of p type 34b in contact with 38, fig3) in a plan view. Re claim 3, Tanaka in view of Nunotani teaches the device according to claim 1, wherein the third end portion (Tanaka, part of p type 34a in contact with 38, fig3) coincides with an end portion of the second semiconductor region (Tanaka, end of 34a in contact with 38, fig3, [34]) and the fourth end portion (Tanaka, part of p type 34b in contact with 38, fig3) coincides with an end portion of the third semiconductor region (Tanaka, end of 34b in contact with 38, fig3, [34])in a plan view. Re claim 4, Tanaka in view of Nunotani teaches the device according to claim 1, wherein the conductive layer (Tanaka, 22, fig3, [34]) is a frustum having an upper surface (Tanaka, top surface of 22 facing 10, fig3, [34]) facing the semiconductor portion (Tanaka, 10, fig3, [34]) and a lower surface (Tanaka, bottom surface of 22 facing away from 10, fig3, [34]) located on a side opposite to the upper surface, and the frustum becomes thinner from the upper surface toward the lower surface (see figure above). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to XIAOMING LIU whose telephone number is (571)270-0384. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9am-8pm, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine S Kim can be reached at (571)272-8458. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /XIAOMING LIU/Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 06, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740218
STRUCTURE AND FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTOR
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733190
TRANSFER DEVICE FOR TRANSFERRING AN ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727204
NON-VOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12721004
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12720831
METHOD FOR PRODUCING A SIC SUPERJUNCTION DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+10.7%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 609 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month