Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/600,641

SENSING OF OBJECTS

Final Rejection §DP
Filed
Mar 08, 2024
Examiner
ASTACIO-OQUENDO, GIOVANNI
Art Unit
2858
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Brandenburg (Uk) Limited
OA Round
2 (Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
632 granted / 714 resolved
+20.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
731
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.9%
-26.1% vs TC avg
§103
32.9%
-7.1% vs TC avg
§102
14.5%
-25.5% vs TC avg
§112
33.1%
-6.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 714 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 46 – 55, 57, and 60 – 68 are pending. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments have been considered but are moot in view the new ground of rejection (Double Patenting). See the table for comparison of the conflicting claims between the applications. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 57, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, and 65 are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims (46+56+59), 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 57, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, and 65, respectively of copending Application No. 17/966,126. Although the claims at issue are not identical (see the arrangement of the elements of the copending Application No. 17/966,126 comprising a sensor unit comprising a sensor, since in the current application, a sensor is a separate element from the sensor unit), they are not patentably distinct from each other because they encompass substantially similar subject matter. The following table is presented for the purpose of a comparison of the conflicting claims between the applications. Application No. 18/600,641 Application No. 17/966,126 Claim 46 Claim 46 + 56 + 59 A pest monitoring system, comprising: a sensor configured to measure a change in fringe capacitance; and a sensor unit including: a housing including a power source; at least one microprocessor; a non-volatile memory; a transceiver; a clock; and a connector operatively connected to the sensor; wherein the pest monitoring system is disposed in a mesh topology; and wherein the sensor unit is configured to wirelessly feed data to at least one node disposed in the mesh topology. A pest monitoring system, comprising a sensor unit, the sensor unit including: a sensor configured to measure a change in fringe capacitance; a housing including a power source; at least one microprocessor; a non-volatile memory; a transceiver; a clock; and a connector operatively connected to the sensor; wherein the sensor unit is programmed to manage power usage. Claim 56: wherein the pest monitoring system is disposed in at least one of a mesh topology and a wireless network Claim 59: wherein the pest monitoring system is configured to feed data to a central node Claim 47 Claim 47 wherein: the sensor includes a plurality of conductors including: an electrically conductive sensor conductor; and two electrically conductive un-grounded conductors disposed on opposing sides of the sensor conductor to form a triplet; the plurality of conductors are supported on an un-grounded conductive substrate, which is electrically isolated from the plurality of conductors; and each conductor of the plurality of conductors has a width and a thickness, and is disposed spaced apart from other conductors of the plurality of conductors by a distance such that the sensor is tuned to at least one of detect and identify a given animal. wherein: the sensor includes a plurality of conductors including: an electrically conductive sensor conductor; and two electrically conductive un-grounded conductors disposed on opposing sides of the sensor conductor to form a triplet; the plurality of conductors are supported on an un-grounded conductive substrate, which is electrically isolated from the plurality of conductors; and each conductor of the plurality of conductors has a width and a thickness, and is disposed spaced apart from other conductors of the plurality of conductors by a distance such that the sensor is tuned to at least one of detect and identify a given animal. Claim 48 Claim 48 wherein: the sensor conductor includes copper; and the two un-grounded conductors include at least one of copper and aluminium. wherein: the sensor conductor includes copper; and the two un-grounded conductors include at least one of copper and aluminium. Claim 49 Claim 49 wherein the un-grounded conductive substrate is electrically isolated via at least one of a plastics layer and a coating. wherein the un-grounded conductive substrate is electrically isolated via at least one of a plastics layer and a coating. Claim 50 Claim 50 wherein: the sensor is structured as an elongated strip; and the plurality of conductors extend along the elongated strip and are disposed substantially parallel to one another. wherein: the sensor is structured as an elongated strip; and the plurality of conductors extend along the elongated strip and are disposed substantially parallel to one another. Claim 51 Claim 51 wherein: the sensor conductor and one of the two un-grounded conductors define a conductor pair; at least one conductor of the conductor pair is electrically chargeable; each conductor of the conductor pair has an edge about which a fringe field is generatable, the fringe field extending both between and above the conductors of the conductor pair; the fringe field is tuned to at least one of detect and identify a targeted animal when the targeted animal interferes with the fringe field; and the fringe field is determined by a selection of: a material, the width, and the thickness of each conductor of the conductor pair; a distance between the conductors of the conductor pair; and a charge exerted upon the conductor pair. wherein: the sensor conductor and one of the two un-grounded conductors define a conductor pair; at least one conductor of the conductor pair is electrically chargeable; each conductor of the conductor pair has an edge about which a fringe field is generatable, the fringe field extending both between and above the conductors of the conductor pair; the fringe field is tuned to at least one of detect and identify a targeted animal when the targeted animal interferes with the fringe field; and the fringe field is determined by a selection of: a material, the width, and the thickness of each conductor of the conductor pair; a distance between the conductors of the conductor pair; and a charge exerted upon the conductor pair. Claim 52 Claim 52 further comprising a camera. further comprising a camera. Claim 53 Claim 53 wherein the sensor unit further includes an inductive coil for battery charging. wherein the sensor unit further includes an inductive coil for battery charging. Claim 54 Claim 54 wherein the at least one microprocessor is programmed to continuously recalibrate a baseline capacitance. wherein the at least one microprocessor is programmed to continuously recalibrate a baseline capacitance. Claim 55 Claim 55 further comprising at least one of trap and a bait station, wherein the sensor unit is disposed at least one of in and under the at least one of the trap and the bait station. further comprising at least one of trap and a bait station, wherein the sensor unit is disposed at least one of in and under the at least one of the trap and the bait station. Claim 57 Claim 57 wherein the pest monitoring system is configured to communicate via radiofrequency. wherein the pest monitoring system is configured to communicate via radiofrequency. Claim 60 Claim 60 wherein the pest monitoring system is interrogatable via a mobile device. wherein the pest monitoring system is interrogatable via a mobile device. Claim 61 Claim 61 wherein the sensor is structured as an elongated strip. wherein the sensor is structured as an elongated strip. Claim 62 Claim 62 wherein the sensor is flat, flexible, and encased in a plastic wherein the sensor is flat, flexible, and encased in a plastic. Claim 63 Claim 63 further comprising a plurality of sensor units including the sensor unit, wherein: the plurality of sensor units are disposed in a mesh topology; and the mesh topology is configured to self-heal when a link connecting two of the plurality of sensor units to one another becomes lost. further comprising a plurality of sensor units including the sensor unit, wherein: the plurality of sensor units are disposed in a mesh topology; and the mesh topology is configured to self-heal when a link connecting two of the plurality of sensor units to one another becomes lost. Reply to Office Action of June 8, 2023 Claim 64 Claim 64 wherein each of the plurality of sensor units is operatively connected to a central node and is configured to feed data to the central node. wherein each of the plurality of sensor units is operatively connected to a central node and is configured to feed data to the central node. Claim 65 Claim 65 wherein: a first sensor unit of the plurality of sensor units is operatively connected to a second sensor unit of the plurality of sensor units; and the first sensor unit is operatively connected to the central node indirectly via the second sensor unit wherein: a first sensor unit of the plurality of sensor units is operatively connected to a second sensor unit of the plurality of sensor units; and the first sensor unit is operatively connected to the central node indirectly via the second sensor unit Comments The prior art of record found as a result of the search, does not teach alone or in combination all of the elements recited in claim 45. Therefore, no prior art rejection for claim 45 is presented in this action. However, Claims 46 – 55, 57, and 60 – 68 are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Bonemberg et al. (US 2020/0408569 A1) teaches a sensor device, comprising: a first electrode; a first signal generation device configured to apply an electrical signal to the first electrode such that the first electrode emits a first electrical field; a second electrode located at a first distance from the first electrode and configured to pick up the first electrical field (see claim 1). Mikami (US 2019/0324073 A1) discloses a capacitive sensor comprising: a sensor head; and a capacitance measurement unit, wherein the sensor head includes: a sheet-shaped base material; a first conducting layer disposed on one surface of the base material; and a second conducting layer disposed on another surface of the base material, the second conducting layer positioned opposing to the first conducting layer in alignment with the first conducting layer (see claim 1). Reime (US 2011/0095771 A1) suggests a device for capacitive detection of an object such as a post, a line or a finger which is arranged behind a flat article that is transparent to electromagnetic radiation, the device comprising: a sensor which comprises sensor electrodes for at least one of the detection of the object or for the detection of relative movements between the sensor and at least one of the flat article or the finger, and a control circuit for controlling the sensor electrodes (see claim 1). Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GIOVANNI ASTACIO-OQUENDO whose telephone number is (571)270-5724. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:00am - 5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Huy Phan can be reached on 571-272-7924. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GIOVANNI ASTACIO-OQUENDO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2858 7/26/2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §DP
Jul 16, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 26, 2025
Final Rejection — §DP
Mar 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596158
DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE FOR POWER SUPPLY DEVICE FOR ELECTRIC DISCHARGE MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591005
TESTING ELEMENTS FOR BONDED STRUCTURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584725
Continuous Rotation Angle Detection Sensor 360 DEG SMD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578371
Remote Calculation of Earth Connection Impedance
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578381
INSPECTION CONNECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+9.4%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 714 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month