Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 15, 2026
Application No. 18/603,370

INSECTICIDAL PROTEINS AND METHODS FOR THEIR USE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Mar 13, 2024
Priority
Nov 01, 2016 — provisional 62/415,781 +4 more
Examiner
KUBELIK, ANNE R
Art Unit
1663
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Pioneer Hi-bred International Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
75%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
1005 granted / 1326 resolved
+15.8% vs TC avg
Minimal -1% lift
Without
With
+-0.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1375
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
§102
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
§112
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1326 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-2, 8-12, and 18-19 are pending. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The objection to the drawings filed 13 March 2024 is withdrawn in light of Applicant filing new drawings. The rejection of claim 20 under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter is withdrawn in light of Applicant’s cancellation of the claim. The rejection of claims 19-20 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant, regards as the invention. The rejection of claims 1-2, 8-12, and 18-20 under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the structure/function written description requirement is withdrawn in light of Applicant’s amendment to the claims. The rejection of claims 1-2, 8-12, and 18-20 under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, for scope of enablement is withdrawn in light of Applicant’s amendment to the claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-2, 8-12, and 18-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Neither the instant specification nor the originally filed claims appear to provide support for a polypeptide comprising SEQ ID NOs:43 and 44, where the proteins are joined to a heterologous signal or transit sequence or a His tag or fused to a protein of interest. The specification does not provide support for any fusion protein of any specific sequence. In the specification, SEQ ID NOs:43 and 44 were expressed in the same plant via separate expression constructs (¶317-319). Thus, claims to a polypeptide comprising SEQ ID NOs:43 and 44 constitute NEW MATTER. In response to this rejection, Applicant is required to point to support for the polypeptide or to cancel the new matter. In the response filed 16 March 2026, Applicant urges that support is found in Table 2 and in ¶317 (response pg 5). This is not found persuasive. Table 2 only lists SEQ ID NOs:43 and 44 separately, not as a protein comprising both sequences. ¶317 describes cloning separate constructs encoding SEQ ID NOs: 43 and 44, each expressed from different promoters, into Agrobacterium. Neither describe a protein comprising SEQ ID NOs:43 and 44. Conclusion No claim is allowed. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Anne R. Kubelik, Ph.D., whose telephone number is (571) 272-0801. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday, 9:00 am - 5:00 pm Eastern. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amjad Abraham, can be reached at (571) 270-7058. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Anne Kubelik/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1663
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 13, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 16, 2026
Response Filed
May 21, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12672625
PLANTS AND SEEDS OF CORN VARIETY CV988211
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12662682
METHOD FOR PRODUCING BIOLUMINESCENT PLANTS
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12642227
SOYBEAN VARIETY '21850087'
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12642221
WHEAT VARIETY 6PPNK56B
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12622403
Garden Bean Variety Black Diamond
4y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
75%
With Interview (-0.6%)
2y 8m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1326 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month