Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/604,588

SEMICONDUCTOR MODULE HAVING A SUBSTRATE WITH AN INSULATING CERAMIC LAYER AND A METHOD FOR FABRICATING THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 14, 2024
Priority
Mar 14, 2023 — EU 23161843.0
Examiner
LIU, BENJAMIN T
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Infineon Technologies AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
541 granted / 721 resolved
+7.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
755
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
59.4%
+19.4% vs TC avg
§102
30.7%
-9.3% vs TC avg
§112
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 721 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 10-16 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected product, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 8/4/2026. Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-9 in the reply filed on 8/4/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-7 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Oshika (US 2009/0151982) in view of Liu (US 6,482,476). With regards to claim 1, fig. 3 of Oshika discloses a method for fabricating a semiconductor module 10, the method comprising: providing a first metal layer 11; applying, by chemical vapor deposition (“CVD”, par [0074]), a ceramic layer 12 to the first metal layer 11; applying a second metal layer 13 at least in part to the ceramic layer 12; and attaching a semiconductor die 15 on a portion 13a of the second metal layer 13, wherein the ceramic layer 12 has a compressive stress in a range from 0.5 MPa to 20 MPa (“ thickness of the metal substrate 11 with the ease of its handling or the like taken into account is about 100 .mu.m to 1 mm whereas each of the ceramic layer 12, the electrode layer 13A and the solder layer 14 has its thickness generally of 10 .mu.m or less.”, par [0057]). Oshida does not disclose apply by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition, a ceramic layer. However, Liu discloses apply by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (“plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition”, abstract), a ceramic layer (“ceramic coatings”, abstract). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to form the ceramic layer of Oshida with the PECVD as taught in Liu in order to provide a deposition process that is carried out at low temperature to prevent the bulk substrate properties from being adversely affected. See abstract of Liu. With regards to claim 2, fig. 3 of Oshida discloses a material of the ceramic layer 12 comprises one or more of Si3N4, SiO or AlN (“AlN thin film as ceramic layer 12”, par [0074]), Zirconia doped alumina, SiAlON, or mixtures thereof or layerings thereof. With regards to claim 3, fig. 3 of Oshida discloses applying the ceramic layer 12 to a thickness in a range from 10 µm (“10 um “, par [0057]) to 40 µm. With regards to claim 4, fig. 3 of Oshida discloses a thickness ratio of the ceramic layer 12 to the first metal layer 11 is at least 1:5 (10 um to 100 um is 1:10 which is at least 1:15, par [0057]). With regards to claim 5, fig. 3 of Oshida discloses that the ceramic layer 12 has a thermal resistance of less than 13 K/W (“0.03”, par [0058]) based on a one mm2 reference area. With regards to claim 6, Oshida does not disclose a process temperature of the plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition is below 400°C. However, Liu discloses a process temperature of the plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (“plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition”, abstract) is below 400°C (“<350 degC”, abstract). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to form the ceramic layer of Oshida with the PECVD as taught in Liu in order to provide a deposition process that is carried out at low temperature to prevent the bulk substrate properties from being adversely affected. See abstract of Liu. With regards to claim 7, fig. 3 of Oshida discloses an applied thickness of the second metal layer 13 is in a range from 10 µm (“10 um”, par [0057]) to 120 µm. With regards to claim 9, fig. 3 of Oshida discloses the semiconductor die comprises one or more of a semiconductor transistor die (“transistor”, par [0054]), a power semiconductor transistor die, an IGBT, a MOSFET, a diode die, or a driver die. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Oshika (US 2009/0151982), Liu (US 6,482,476), and Tomizawa (US 2019/0326061). With regards to claim 8, Oshika and Liu do not disclose that the second metal layer is applied by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition or by sputtering. However, Tomizawa discloses that the second metal layer 14 is applied by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition or by sputtering (“first and second external electrodes 14 and 15 can be formed by, for example, performing sputtering”, par [0115]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to deposit the electrodes of Oshika by sputtering as taught in Tomizawa in order to form external electrodes on a ceramic surface. See par [0117] of Tomizawa. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENJAMIN T LIU whose telephone number is (571)272-6009. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 11:00am-7:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yara J Green can be reached at 571 270-3035. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BENJAMIN TZU-HUNG LIU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 14, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751292
PACKAGE STRUCTURE INCLUDING RING STRUCTURE ATTACHED BY HYBRID ADHESIVE AND METHODS OF FORMING THE SAME
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745683
MULTI-CHIP HIGH MEMORY BANDWIDTH CONFIGURATION
4y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12721141
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
4y 1m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12713979
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGES AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING THE SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGES
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12713947
VIA ARRAY IN A REDISTRIBUTION LAYER STRUCTURE FOR STRESS RELIEF
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+12.3%)
2y 11m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 721 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month