Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/610,790

SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 20, 2024
Priority
Sep 05, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0117905
Examiner
CHEN, DAVID Z
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
45%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 45% of resolved cases
45%
Career Allowance Rate
308 granted / 689 resolved
-15.3% vs TC avg
Strong +50% interview lift
Without
With
+50.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
754
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
49.1%
+9.1% vs TC avg
§102
24.9%
-15.1% vs TC avg
§112
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 689 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Response to Amendment/Restriction Applicant's election with traverse of Species I and claims 1-2 and 4-16 in the reply filed on July 07, 2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that “there is a substantial overlap of common elements…of the alleged Species I and Species II.” This is found persuasive and all claims are under examination and the Election of Species Requirement on June 30, 2026 is hereby withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. As to claim 1, it is not clear whether limitations are missing in view of “the second word line, , the second active pattern” . Thus, the limitation renders the claims indefinite and clarification is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)(2) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2022/0102352 A1 to Lee et al. (“Lee”). As to claim 1, Lee discloses a semiconductor memory device, comprising: a peripheral gate structure (SA, NMOS, PMOS) on a substrate (100); bit lines (BL) above the peripheral gate structure (SA, NMOS, PMOS), the bit lines (BL) being spaced apart from each other in a first direction, the bit lines (BL) extending in a second direction different from the first direction; a first active pattern (VP1) and a second active pattern (VP2) above the bit lines (BL), the first active pattern (VP1) and the second active pattern (VP2) being spaced apart from each other in the second direction; a first word line (GE1a) and a second word line (GE2a) between the first active pattern (VP1) and the second active pattern (VP2), the first word line (GE1a) being adjacent to the first active pattern (VP1), the second word line (GE2a) being adjacent to the second active pattern (VP2); a first back gate electrode (GE1b) corresponding to the first word line (GE1a), the first active pattern (VP1) being between the first back gate electrode (GE1b) and the first word line (GE1a); a second back gate electrode (GE2b) corresponding to the second word line (GE2a), , the second active pattern (VP2) being between the second back gate electrode (GE2b) and the second word line (GE2a); and a word line shielding structure (141, 150, SL2, LP) between the first word line (GE1a) and the second word line (GE2a) (See Fig. 1-Fig. 12, ¶ 0066-¶ 0076, ¶ 0079-¶ 0084, ¶ 0094-¶ 0096, ¶ 0106-¶ 0118, ¶ 0127-¶ 0129, ¶ 0190) (Notes: the limitation “word line shielding structure” is interpreted as a structure that covers or protects the word line). As to claim 2, Lee further discloses wherein an interval between the first word line (GE1a) and the second word line (GE2a) in the second direction is 10 nm or less (See ¶ 0083, ¶ 0084) (Notes: the first and second word lines may be 1 nm and formed of a multi-layered structure such that the outermost layer is an interval that is 10 nm or less). As to claim 3, Lee further discloses wherein an interval between the first word line (GE1a) and the second word line (GE2a) in the second direction is 6 nm or less (See ¶ 0083, ¶ 0084) (Notes: the first and second word lines may be 1 nm and formed of a multi-layered structure such that the outermost layer is an interval that is 6 nm or less). As to claim 4, Lee further discloses wherein the word line shielding structure (141, 150, SL2, LP) comprises: a word line shielding conductive pattern (SL2, LP); and a word line shielding insulating liner (141, 150) including a first portion between the word line shielding conductive pattern (SL2, LP) and the first word line (GE1a) and a second portion between the word line shielding conductive pattern (SL2, LP) and the second word line (GE2a) (See Fig. 12). As to claim 5, Lee further discloses wherein a length of the word line shielding conductive pattern (SL2, LP) in the second direction is 2 nm or less (See Fig. 12) (Notes: the curvature toward the top and bottom is 2 nm or less). As to claim 6, Lee further discloses wherein a length of the word line shielding insulating liner (141, 150) in the second direction is 2 nm or less (See Fig. 12) (Notes: the length corresponds to the first/second portion is 2 nm or less). As to claim 7, Lee further discloses wherein the word line shielding conductive pattern (SL2, LP) includes a conductive material including conductive metal nitride, conductive metal silicon nitride, metal carbonitride, conductive metal silicide, conductive metal oxide, a two-dimensional material, a metal, or a combination thereof (See ¶ 0106, ¶ 0109). As to claim 8, Lee further discloses wherein the word line shielding insulating liner (141, 150) includes an insulating material including a silicon nitride (SiN) film, a silicon oxynitride (SiON) film, a silicon carbide (SiC) film, a silicon carbon nitride (SiCN) film, or a combination thereof (See ¶ 0190). As to claim 9, Lee further discloses wherein the word line shielding conductive pattern (SL2, LP) extends in a third direction different from the first direction and the second direction and overlaps the first word line (GE1a) and the second word line (GE2a) in the second direction (See Fig. 12). As to claim 10, Lee further discloses wherein a length of the word line shielding conductive pattern (SL2, LP) in the third direction is equal to or greater than a length of each of the first word line (GE1a) and the second word line (GE2a) in the third direction (See Fig. 12). As to claim 11, Lee further discloses wherein a height of a lower end portion of the word line shielding conductive pattern (SL2, LP) in the third direction is equal to or less than a height of a lower end portion of each of the first word line (GE1a) and the second word line (GE2a) in the third direction, and a height of an upper end portion of the word line shielding conductive pattern (SL2, LP) in the third direction is equal to or greater than a height of an upper end portion of each of the first word line (GE1a) and the second word line (GE2a) in the third direction (See Fig. 12). As to claim 12, Lee further discloses wherein the word line shielding conductive pattern (SL2, LP) extends in the third direction and overlaps the first back gate electrode (GE1b) and the second back gate electrode (GE2b) in the second direction (See Fig. 12). As to claim 13, Lee discloses further comprising: a bit line shielding structure (SL1, 110) being adjacent to an adjacent one of the bit lines (BL) and above the peripheral gate structure (SA, NMOS, PMOS), the bit line shielding structure (SL1) extending in the second direction (See Fig. 8, ¶ 0106, ¶ 0112). As to claim 14, Lee further discloses wherein the bit line shielding structure (SL1, 110) includes a bit line shielding conductive pattern (SL1) and a bit line shielding insulating liner (110), the bit line shielding liner (110) being between the bit line shielding conductive pattern (SL1) and the bit line (BL) (See Fig. 8). As to claim 15, Lee further discloses wherein each of the first active pattern (VP1) and the second active pattern (VP2) is made of a monocrystalline semiconductor material (See ¶ 0080). As to claim 16, Lee discloses further comprising: a bonding insulating film (110) between the peripheral gate structure (SA, NMOS, PMOS) and the bit lines (BL) (See Fig. 10, ¶ 0112). As to claim 17, Lee discloses a semiconductor memory device, comprising: a peripheral gate structure (SA, NMOS, PMOS) on a substrate (100); bit lines (BL) above the peripheral gate structure (SA, NMOS, PMOS), the bit lines (BL) being spaced apart from each other in a first direction, the bit lines (BL) extending in a second direction different from the first direction; a first active pattern (VP1) and a second active pattern (VP2) above the bit lines (BL), the first active pattern (VP1) and the second active pattern (VP2) being spaced apart from each other in the second direction; a first word line (GE1a) and a second word line (GE2a) between the first active pattern (VP1) and the second active pattern (VP2), the first word line (GE1a) being adjacent to the first active pattern (VP1), the second word line (GE2a) being adjacent to the second active pattern (VP2); a first back gate electrode (GE1b) corresponding to the first word line (GE1a), the first active pattern (VP1) being between the first back gate electrode (GE1b) and the first word line (GE1a); and a second back gate electrode (GE2b) corresponding to the second word line (GE2a), the second active pattern (VP2) being between the second back gate electrode (GE2b) and the second word line (GE2a), wherein an interval between the first word line (GE1a) and the second word line (GE2a) in the second direction is 6 nm or less (See Fig. 1-Fig. 12, ¶ 0066-¶ 0076, ¶ 0079-¶ 0084, ¶ 0094-¶ 0096, ¶ 0106-¶ 0118, ¶ 0127-¶ 0129, ¶ 0190) (Notes: the first and second word lines may be 1 nm and formed of a multi-layered structure such that the outermost layer is an interval that is 6 nm or less). As to claim 18, Lee discloses further comprising: a word line shielding structure (141, 150, SL2, LP) between the first word line (GE1a) and the second word line (GE2a) (See Fig. 12) (Notes: the limitation “word line shielding structure” is interpreted as a structure that covers or protects the word line). As to claim 19, Lee further discloses wherein the word line shielding structure (141, 150, SL2, LP) comprises, a word line shielding conductive pattern (SL2, LP), and a word line shielding insulating liner (141, 150) being between the word line shielding conductive pattern (SL2, LP) and the first word line (GE1a) and being between the word line shielding conductive pattern (SL2, LP) and the second word line (GE2a), and wherein the word line shielding conductive pattern (SL2, LP) extends in a third direction different from the first direction and the second direction, and overlaps the first word line (GE1a) and the second word line (GE2a) in the second direction (See Fig. 12). As to claim 20, Lee discloses wherein a semiconductor memory device, comprising: a peripheral gate structure (SA, NMOS, PMOS) on a substrate (100); bit lines (BL) above the peripheral gate structure (SA, NMOS, PMOS), the bit lines (BL) being spaced apart from each other in a first direction, the bit lines (BL) extending in a second direction different from the first direction; a bit line shielding structure (SL1, 110) being adjacent to an adjacent one of the bit lines (BL) and above the peripheral gate structure (SA, NMOS, PMOS), the bit line shielding structure (SL1, 110) extending in the second direction; a first active pattern (VP1) and a second active pattern (VP2) above the bit lines (BL), the first active pattern (VP1) and the second active pattern (VP2) being spaced apart from each other in the second direction; a first word line (GE1a) and a second word line (GE2a) between the first active pattern (VP1) and the second active pattern (VP2), the first word line (GE1a) being adjacent to the first active pattern (VP1), the second word line (GE2a) being adjacent to the second active pattern (VP2); a first back gate electrode (GE1b) corresponding to the first word line (GE1a), the first active pattern (VP1) being between the first back gate electrode (GE1b) and the first word line (GE1a); a second back gate electrode (GE2b) corresponding to the second word line (GE2a), the second active pattern (VP2) being between the second back gate electrode (GE2b) and the second word line (GE2a); and a word line shielding structure (141, 150, SL2, LP) between the first word line (GE1a) and the second word line (GE2a), wherein an interval between the first word line (GE1a) and the second word line (GE2a) in the second direction is 6 nm or less (See Fig. 1-Fig. 12, ¶ 0066-¶ 0076, ¶ 0079-¶ 0084, ¶ 0094-¶ 0096, ¶ 0106-¶ 0118, ¶ 0127-¶ 0129, ¶ 0190) (Notes: the limitation “shielding structure” is interpreted as a structure that covers or protects the word line and the bit line and the first and second word lines may be 1 nm and formed of a multi-layered structure such that the outermost layer is an interval that is 6 nm or less). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID CHEN whose telephone number is (571)270-7438. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 12-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JOSHUA BENITEZ can be reached at (571) 270-1435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID CHEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2815
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 20, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740412
RF DEVICES WITH NANOTUBE PARTICLES FOR ENHANCED PERFORMANCE AND METHODS OF FORMING THE SAME
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733194
NITRIDE-BASED HIGH ELECTRON MOBILITY TRANSISTOR AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12707723
DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING CRACK DETECTING LINE
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702055
SEMICONDUCTOR MODULE WITH BENT EXTERNAL TERMINAL
4y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12690229
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH SPLIT-GATE AND METHOD FORMING THE SAME
4y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
45%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+50.1%)
3y 7m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 689 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month