Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/610,979

INTEGRATION OF MICRODEVICES INTO SYSTEM SUBSTRATE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Mar 20, 2024
Examiner
GEYER, SCOTT B
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Vuereal Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
94%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 94% — above average
94%
Career Allow Rate
664 granted / 706 resolved
+26.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
721
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§102
42.4%
+2.4% vs TC avg
§112
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 706 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species 1A and 2A (claims 2-4, 6, and 8-16) in the reply filed on December 3, 2025 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2, 8 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 8 recites a shape forms “a part of a sphere”. It is unclear to the examiner what shape the applicant actually intends for the recited “3D shape to be”, with the use of this vague statement. For purposes of examination, the examiner will interpret the 3D shape to be “dome-shaped”. Claim 2 recites the limitation "the plurality of pixelated microdevices" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 16 recites the limitation "the plurality of pixelated microdevices" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 3, 4, 6, and 9-15 are also rejected since they all depend from claim 2, and thus inherit the above-cited deficiency of claim 2. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the pending claims have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Scott B. Geyer (telephone: 571-272-1958). The examiner can normally be reached on Monday to Friday, 10AM - 4PM (ET). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at: http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine S. Kim (telephone: 571-272-8458). The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (in U.S.A. or Canada) or 571-272-1000. /SCOTT B GEYER/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 20, 2024
Application Filed
May 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Aug 11, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 09, 2026
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604674
BACK SIDE PHASE CHANGE MEMORY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604641
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597568
MANUFACTURING METHOD OF LITHIUM-ION CAPACITOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593730
DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING PROTRUDING PORTION AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593720
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE COMPRISING ELECTRODE TERMINALS COATED WITH AN INSULATING FILM HAVING A THICKNESS OF LESS THAN 100 MICRONS, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, AND POWER CONVERSION APPARATUS COMPRISING THE SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
94%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+4.4%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 706 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month