Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/616,192

NETWORK SWITCH TESTING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TESTING NETWORK SWITCH

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 26, 2024
Examiner
MIAH, RAZU A
Art Unit
2441
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Alpha Networks Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
403 granted / 477 resolved
+26.5% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+26.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
487
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.7%
-27.3% vs TC avg
§103
41.4%
+1.4% vs TC avg
§102
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
§112
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 477 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This communication is in response to application filed on March 26, 2024 in which claims 1-10 are presented for examination. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in Taiwan parent application No. 112142785 on 11/07/2023. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 9/4/2024, and 2/3/2026 is/are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Specification Objection to the Abstract The content of a patent abstract should be such as to enable the reader thereof, regardless of his or her degree of familiarity with patent documents, to determine quickly from a cursory inspection of the abstract the nature and gist of the technical disclosure and that which is new in the art to which the invention pertains (MPEP 608.01 (b)). The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because the current abstract merely repeats the claim language and does not enable the reader thereof to determine the nature and gist of the technical disclosure and that which is new in the art to which the invention pertains. The abstract should be in narrative form and should describe the disclosure sufficiently to assist readers in deciding whether there is a need for consulting the full patent text for details. Correction is required. See MPEP § 608.01 (b). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claim 1: The term "to-be-tested" in lines 4-5, and last paragraph is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term "to-be-tested" is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Claim 6: The term "to-be-tested" in lines 5-7, and last few paragraphs is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term "to-be-tested" is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Claims 4, and 8: The term "to-be-tested" in lines 3 and 6, is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term "to-be-tested" is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. The dependent claims 2-5 and 7-10 included in the statement of rejection but not specifically addressed in the body of the rejection have inherited the deficiencies of their parent claim and have not resolved the deficiencies. Therefore, they are rejected based on the same rationale as applied to their parent claims above. Examiner notes: the term flooding mechanism of the VLAN, is interpreted as “computer network routing algorithms in which every incoming packet is sent through every outgoing link except the one it arrived on”. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See Form 892. Palazzolo et al. (US 20150333927 A1): teaches dynamic discovery and assignment of virtual local area networks (VLANs), a network switch receives a request for VLAN configuration, from a device connecting to a port of the network switch, the network switch retrieves a list of available VLANs at the port, determines whether respective ones of the available VLANs are configured for the device, forms an acknowledgement including a list of VLANs configured for the device, and sends the acknowledgement to the device [03-04]. Selvaraj et al. (US 20210409293 A1): teaches a network device for network traffic flooding, specifically, the method and network device disclosed herein implement the mitigation of the lack of data-link layer or L2 addressing resolutions, usually learned by or programmed manually into the network device (abstract). Correspondence Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Razu Miah whose telephone number is (571)270-5433. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 9-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Glenton Burgess can be reached at 23949. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAZU A MIAH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2441
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 26, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603798
OPERATING A BROADBAND ACCESS NETWORK OF A TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK WITH A CUSTOMER PREMISES EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598108
METHOD AND SYSTEM OF COLLECTING TOPOLOGY AND INVENTORY DATA IN OPEN RADIO ACCESS NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12573389
VOICE-ASSISTED WIRELESS DOCKING IN HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTING PLATFORMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574317
PROACTIVE ROUTING OF APPLICATION TRAFFIC IN SOFTWARE DEFINED WIDE AREA NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568140
USING VIRTUAL BUS TO FORM VIRTUAL NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+26.8%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 477 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month