Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Alpha Networks Inc.

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 22 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Alpha Networks Inc. manages 3 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These matters are assigned to 3 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. The concentration in 2 art units indicates a specific technical focus for these 3 actions. Practitioners should be aware that the pending office actions are being reviewed by 3 different individuals, which may lead to varying interpretations of the 2 art units' guidelines.

PERVIN, NUZHAT is the busiest examiner for the company. This examiner is currently handling 1 pending office action. With 3 examiners for 3 actions, each pending matter is being reviewed by a different official within the USPTO. This distribution across 3 distinct examiners means that the outcome of each action is independent of the others. The focus within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area across only 2 art units suggests that while the examiners differ, the technical standards applied to the actions may be similar.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
33% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PERVIN, NUZHAT 1 81.1% +13.7%
LEVI, DAMEON E 1 64.8% +1.8%
HENSON, BRANDON JAMES 1 68.2% +27.3%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18085876 TARGET DETECTION METHOD, TARGET DETECTION DEVICE, AND MILLIMETER WAVE RADAR SYSTEM HENSON, BRANDON JAMES 8d overdue
18945028 METHOD FOR REDUCING COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY IN DETERMINING DIRECTION OF ARRIVAL FOR RADAR SYSTEM, AND RADAR SYSTEM IMPLEMENTING THE SAME PERVIN, NUZHAT —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18085876 TARGET DETECTION METHOD, TARGET DETECTION DEVICE, AND MILLIMETER WAVE RADAR SYSTEM HENSON, BRANDON JAMES 8d overdue
18945028 METHOD FOR REDUCING COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY IN DETERMINING DIRECTION OF ARRIVAL FOR RADAR SYSTEM, AND RADAR SYSTEM IMPLEMENTING THE SAME PERVIN, NUZHAT —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3648 2
2845 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18945028 METHOD FOR REDUCING COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY IN DETERMINING DIRECTION OF ARRIVAL FOR RADAR SYSTEM, AND RADAR SYSTEM IMPLEMENTING THE SAME PERVIN, NUZHAT 3648 §101§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 12, 2024
18810358 MAGNETO-ELECTRIC DIPOLE ANTENNA AND ANTENNA ARRAY USING THE SAME LEVI, DAMEON E 2845 §103 Final Rejection 20d Pending Aug 20, 2024
18085876 TARGET DETECTION METHOD, TARGET DETECTION DEVICE, AND MILLIMETER WAVE RADAR SYSTEM HENSON, BRANDON JAMES 3648 §103§112Other Non-Final OA 8d overdue Pending Dec 21, 2022

Managing Alpha Networks Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month