Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/616,773

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 26, 2024
Priority
Oct 01, 2021 — JP 2021-162803 +1 more
Examiner
SHAMSUZZAMAN, MOHAMMED
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Rohm Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
741 granted / 915 resolved
+21.0% vs TC avg
Strong +55% interview lift
Without
With
+55.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
938
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
51.5%
+11.5% vs TC avg
§102
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
§112
32.0%
-8.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 915 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, Species I (Fig. 4-5), (claims 1-10) in the reply filed on 06/18/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 11-16 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 6/18/26. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 1 defines “an encapsulation resin encapsulating the semiconductor element and the electrical conductor” and “the encapsulation resin covers the element back surface, the element side surface, and the wiring front surface” is indefinite. As described in specification para [0031] and Fig.4 shows an encapsulation portion 80 of the encapsulation resin 60 covers the element back surface, the element side surface, and the wiring front surface. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 4 defines “wherein the element front surface of the semiconductor element and the resin front surface of the encapsulation resin each include a cut mark” is indefinite. Para [0107] describes a cut mark is formed in the exposed wiring side surface 45 of the wiring line 40 and the encapsulation side surface 83 of the encapsulation portion 80 (the resin side surface 63 of the encapsulation resin 60). Appropriate correction is required. Claim 10 defines in line 6 “the substrate include..” has antecedent issues which should be “the flat substrate includes..”. Appropriate correction is required. Claims 2-10 are also rejected being dependent on claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yanagida et al (JP 2020027850A). Regarding claim 1: Yanagida teaches in Fig. 20 about a semiconductor device, comprising: PNG media_image1.png 631 840 media_image1.png Greyscale a semiconductor element 20 including an element front surface, an element back surface opposite to the element front surface, and an element side surface joining the element front surface and the element back surface (As marked); an electrical conductor 30 opposed to the element back surface and including a wiring line 31 on which the semiconductor element is mounted (As shown); and an encapsulation resin 60 encapsulating the semiconductor element and the electrical conductor, wherein the wiring line 31 includes a wiring front surface opposed to the element back surface and a wiring back surface opposite to the wiring front surface (as marked), the electrical conductor includes a terminal 32 extending from the wiring back surface in a direction (downward direction -Z) opposite from the semiconductor element (+Z direction), the encapsulation resin covers the element back surface, the element side surface, and the wiring front surface (As shown by 60A), and the element front surface is exposed without being covered by the encapsulation resin (as shown the element front surface is no covered by 60). Regarding claim 2: Yanagida teaches in Fig. 20 wherein the encapsulation resin includes a resin front surface facing in a same direction as the element front surface of the semiconductor element, and the element front surface of the semiconductor element is greater in area than the resin front surface. Regarding claim 3: Yanagida teaches in Fig. 20 wherein the encapsulation resin includes a resin front surface facing in a same direction as the element front surface of the semiconductor element, and the resin front surface is flush with the element front surface of the semiconductor element. Regarding claim 4: As marked above, Yanagida teaches in Fig. 20 wherein the element front surface of the semiconductor element and the resin front surface of the encapsulation resin each include a cut mark. Regarding claim 5: As marked above, Yanagida teaches in Fig. 20 wherein the encapsulation resin includes a resin front surface facing in a same direction as the element front surface of the semiconductor element, a resin back surface opposite to the resin front surface, and a resin side surface joining the resin front surface and the resin back surface, and the terminal is exposed from the resin back surface and the resin side surface. Regarding claim 6: As marked above, Yanagida teaches in Fig. 20 wherein the terminal includes an exposed terminal side surface exposed from the resin side surface, and the exposed terminal side surface is flush with the resin side surface. Regarding claim 7: As marked above, Yanagida teaches in Fig. 20 wherein the wiring line includes an exposed wiring side surface exposed from the resin side surface, and the exposed wiring side surface is flush with the resin side surface. Regarding claim 8: Yanagida teaches in Fig. 20 wherein the semiconductor element 10 and the wiring line 31 are electrically connected by a conductive bonding portion 13 arranged between the semiconductor element and the wiring line, and the encapsulation resin covers a region of the wiring front surface excluding a region in which the bonding portion is arranged (as shown). Regarding claim 9: Yanagida teaches in Fig. 20 wherein the wiring line extends in a direction orthogonal to a thickness-wise direction of the encapsulation resin. Regarding claim 10: Yanagida teaches in Fig. 20 wherein the encapsulation resin 60 includes a flat substrate 60B, and an encapsulation portion 60A formed on the substrate to encapsulate the semiconductor element 10, the substrate includes a substrate front surface facing in a same direction as the element front surface of the semiconductor element (as marked), and the wiring line 31 is formed on the substrate front surface (as marked above). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MOHAMMED SHAMSUZZAMAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1839. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7 am -4 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Fernando Toledo can be reached at 571-272-1867. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Mohammed Shamsuzzaman/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707922
DETERMINING A SUBSTRATE LOCATION THRESHOLD BASED ON OPTICAL PROPERTIES
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707923
SUBSTRATE CONVEYANCE METHOD, SUBSTRATE PROCESSING DEVICE, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701954
SYSTEM FOR STORING WAFER AND SYSTEM FOR MONITORING POLLUTION OF WAFER
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696712
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12696729
ROBOT BLADE HAVING MULTIPLE SENSORS FOR MULTIPLE DIFFERENT ALIGNMENT TASKS
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+55.2%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 915 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month