Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/618,480

ADAPTIVE MULTI-LAYER ELECTRONIC CONTENT MANAGEMENT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 27, 2024
Examiner
BELOUSOV, ANDREY
Art Unit
2172
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Wells Fargo Bank N A
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
411 granted / 594 resolved
+14.2% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+26.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
627
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
53.9%
+13.9% vs TC avg
§102
31.4%
-8.6% vs TC avg
§112
8.7%
-31.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 594 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This action is responsive to the filing of 3/27/24. Claims 1-20 are pending and have been considered below. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Almecija (20180365025.) Claim 1, 11, 20: Almecija discloses a system, comprising: a processor coupled to a memory that includes instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to: receive an electronic document (Fig. 12: 1200 User Interface with images / toolbars); determine an interaction event (par. 57, at step 208, a user action occurs. User IO 102 receives an input to perform some action directed towards the software application; par. 59, logic to track the user input and actions; Fig. 5: Input tracking) for at least one section (top toolbar section; par. 68, clicking on the magnifying glass button / click the right most button in top toolbar 1206) of the electronic document; determine an expertise level of a user of the electronic document based on the interaction event (user input causes output of hints / dynamic shortcuts that are tailored based on their level (i.e. the program needs to fetch / determine their level); par. 68, shows the likely next buttons the user will want after clicking on the magnifying glass button; par. 64, hints can be tailored to the user based on user experience level; par. 5, user experience level may be determined from current session user interaction history); assign a rule (par. 68, rule to show hints / dynamic shortcuts) to the at least one section (Fig. 12: toolbar section) based on the interaction event (par. 68, clicking on the magnifying glass button / click the right most button in top toolbar 1206 ) and the expertise level of the user (par. 32, The system can then tailor and/or adapt the user interface (imaging layouts, menu, buttons, toolbars, tools options, learning hints, input/output devices, etc) based on the determined type of user and experience user; par. 64, hints can be tailored to the user based on user experience level); and implement an action to the at least one section of the electronic document based on a determination that the interaction event has occurred and the rule (Fig. 12-13, display dynamic shortcuts.) Claim 2, 12: Almecija discloses the system of claim 1 wherein the instructions further cause the processor to: organize the electronic document into a plurality of layers including a base content layer (Fig. 12: 1200 UI) that contains the electronic document and a first layer that contains information (Fig. 13: predicted dynamic shortcuts) corresponding to the base content layer, wherein the information contained in the first layer is generated by a machine learning model (par. 6, user experience learning component can apply at least one of machine learning, deep learning, or a neural network to analyze the registered user actions and perform the prediction of the next intended action.) Claim 3, 13: Almecija discloses the system of claim 2 wherein the plurality of layers includes a second layer (Fig. 15: 1510, Hints, layered over) that contains information corresponding to the first layer, wherein the information contained in the second layer is generated by the machine learning model (par. 43, Each time user experience learning component 142 is applied, the UI system can improve in its understanding of user needs and preferences, and thus output improved adapted user interfaces.) Claim 4, 14: Almecija discloses the system of claim 2 wherein the instructions further cause the processor to: identify at least one layer of the plurality of layers, wherein the at least one layer corresponds to the expertise level of the user (par. 64, hints can be tailored to the user based on user experience level as well as various aspects of their user profile); and display the at least one layer to the user (Fig. 15: 1510, Hints, layered over.) Claim 5, 15: Almecija discloses the system of claim 2, wherein the machine learning model is trained on a library of previous interaction events and is configured to determine the expertise level of the user based on the interaction event (par. 60, user experience system 104, through user experience learning component 142 in an embodiment, updates the learning training base. The learning training base includes data, models, and analysis to empower the predictive features of step 210.) Claim 6, 16: Almecija discloses the system of claim 1, wherein a machine learning model determines the action to be taken on the at least one section of the electronic document based on the expertise level of the user (par. 6, user experience learning component can apply at least one of machine learning, deep learning, or a neural network to analyze the registered user actions and perform the prediction of the next intended action.) Claim 7, 17: Almecija discloses the system of claim 1, wherein the action comprises providing a summary of the at least one section of the electronic document, (Fig. 15: 1510 Hints summarizing the function) wherein the summary corresponds to the expertise level of a user of the system (par. 32, The system can then tailor and/or adapt the user interface (imaging layouts, menu, buttons, toolbars, tools options, learning hints, input/output devices, etc) based on the determined type of user and experience user; par. 64, hints can be tailored to the user based on user experience level.) Claim 8, 18: Almecija discloses the system of claim 1, wherein the interaction event comprises at least one of a text input or a voice input (par. 101, a user can interact with a software application in many different user interface paradigms, from touch, mouse, voice, eye movement, and so forth.) Claim 9, 19: Almecija discloses the system of claim 1, wherein the instructions further cause the processor to generate a second electronic document based on the interaction event (Fig. 15: 1510, hint document.) Claim 10: Almecija discloses the system of claim 9, wherein the second electronic document is generated by a machine learning model configured to predict a need for the second electronic document based on the interaction event (par. 6, user experience learning component can apply at least one of machine learning, deep learning, or a neural network to analyze the registered user actions and perform the prediction of the next intended action.) Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Malviya (2025/0272480) dynamic UI for automated document creation. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREY BELOUSOV whose telephone number is (571) 270-1695 and Andrew.belousov@uspto.gov email. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Friday EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Adam Queler, can be reached at telephone number 571-272-4140. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center and the Private Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center or Private PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center and Private PAIR for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. /Andrey Belousov/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2145 12/12/2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 27, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602533
CONTENT GENERATION WITH INTEGRATED AUTOFORMATTING IN WORD PROCESSORS THAT DEPLOY LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12585372
GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE SYSTEM GUIDE MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586829
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING ROLL MAP AND MANUFACTURING BATTERY USING ROLL MAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12564733
METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING TREATMENT TIME AND PLAN QUALITY FOR RADIOTHERAPY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12536210
AUTOMATED CONTENT CREATION AND CONTENT SERVICES FOR COLLABORATION PLATFORMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+26.6%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 594 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month