Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/623,467

DISPLAY DEVICE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Apr 01, 2024
Examiner
MANDEVILLE, JASON M
Art Unit
2623
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allow Rate
401 granted / 729 resolved
-7.0% vs TC avg
Strong +47% interview lift
Without
With
+47.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
771
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
50.3%
+10.3% vs TC avg
§102
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
§112
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 729 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Election/Restrictions Claims 15-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 02 June 2025. Applicant’s election without traverse of Species I, corresponding to the embodiment of Figure 4B of the originally filed disclosure and originally filed Claims 1-14, in the reply filed on 02 June 2025 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bae et al. (hereinafter “Bae” US 2022 / 0045137) in view of Tian et al. (hereinafter “Tian” US 2023 / 0075199). As pertaining to Claim 1, Bae discloses (see Fig. 1, Fig. 5, and Fig. 7) a display device (1; see Page 4, Para. [0058] and [0060]) comprising: a base layer (see (100) in Fig. 7) including a plurality of element regions (see (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5 corresponding to (P1, P2, P3) in Fig. 7) and a boundary region (i.e., a groove (GR); see Fig. 7 corresponding to the spaces between (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5) adjacent to the plurality of element regions (again, see (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5 corresponding to (P1, P2, P3) in Fig. 7); a plurality of inorganic layers (see (111, 112, 113) in Fig. 7) on the base layer (100) and including an opening (see (GR) in Fig. 7) defined in at least some of the inorganic layers (111, 112, 113), the opening (GR) corresponding to the boundary region (again, see (GR) in Fig. 7 corresponding to the spaces between (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5; see Page 6, Para. [0095]-[0100]); an organic layer (see (115) in Fig. 7) inside the opening (GR) and on the plurality of inorganic layers (111, 112, 113); a pixel driving circuit (see (PC) in Fig. 7) between the base layer (100) and the organic layer (115) and in each of the plurality of element regions (again, see (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5 corresponding to (P1, P2, P3) in Fig. 7); and a light emitting element (see (OLED) in Fig. 7) on the organic layer (115) and electrically connected to the pixel driving circuit (PC), wherein the at least some of the inorganic layers (111, 112, 113) include an inorganic stacked structure (see Fig. 7) defined by the opening (GR) and in each of the plurality of element regions (again, see (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5 corresponding to (P1, P2, P3) in Fig. 7), the opening (GR) surrounds the inorganic stacked structure (see (111, 112, 113) in Fig. 7; and see (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5) in a plan view, the inorganic stacked structure (again, see (111, 112, 113) in Fig. 7; and see (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5) has a substantially polygonal shape (i.e., a rectangular shape; see (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5) in a plan view and includes a vertex region (see the corner regions of (A1, A2, A3)), and the vertex region (see the corner regions of (A1, A2, A3)) having an outwardly convex shape (see Fig. 5) in a plan view (see Page 7, Para. [0109]-[0110] and [0112]-[0113]; Page 8, Para. [0116]-[0119], [0121], and [0125]-[0128]; and Page 9, Para. [0136]). While Bae discloses that the inorganic stacked structure includes a vertex region (i.e., see the corner regions of (A1, A2, A3)) having an outwardly convex shape, Bae does not explicitly disclose that the vertex region has an outwardly convex curve shape. However, in the same field of endeavor, Tian discloses (see Fig. 2a and Fig. 3a) a display device comprising a base layer (10) including a plurality of element regions (P1, P2, P3) and a boundary region (i.e., see a boundary of (100)) adjacent to the plurality of element regions (P1, P2, P3), and a plurality of inorganic layers (i.e., see (11, 13, 15, 17)) on the base layer (10) and including an opening (300) corresponding to the boundary region (i.e., see the boundary of (100)), wherein the inorganic layers (11, 13, 15, 17) include an inorganic stacked structure defined by the opening (300) and in each of the plurality of element regions (P1, P2, P3), the opening (300) surrounds the inorganic stacked structure in a plan view (see Fig. 2a), the inorganic stacked structure has a substantially polygonal shape in a plan view and includes a vertex region (i.e., a corner region; again, see Fig. 2a) having an outwardly convex curve shape in a plan view (see Page 3 through Page 4, Para. [0041] and [0043]-[0046]). It is a goal of Tian to provide a display device that exhibits improved stretchability and/or flexibility and maintains the ability to resist stretch damage by including at least an inorganic stacked structure that has a substantially polygonal shape and includes a vertex region having an outwardly convex curve shape (see Fig. 2a and Page 3, Para. [0041] and Page 4, Para. [0047]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Bae with the teachings of Tian, such that the inorganic stacked structure that has a substantially polygonal shape and includes a vertex region having an outwardly convex curve shape in order to provide a display device that exhibits improved stretchability and/or flexibility and maintains the ability to resist stretch damage, as suggested by Tian. As pertaining to Claim 2, Bae discloses (see Fig. 5 and Fig. 7) that the inorganic stacked structure (again, see (111, 112, 113) in Fig. 7; and see (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5) has a substantially square shape (i.e., a rectangular shape) in a plan view (see Fig. 5). As pertaining to Claim 3, Bae discloses (see Fig. 5 and Fig. 7) that each of the plurality of element regions (see (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5 corresponding to (P1, P2, P3) in Fig. 7) comprises a first pixel region (i.e., see any of (R), (G), or (B) associated with any of (211), (212), or (213) in Fig. 5) and a second pixel region (i.e., see any other of (R), (G), or (B) associated with any of (211), (212), or (213) in Fig. 5), and the pixel driving circuit (PC) includes a first pixel driving circuit (i.e., a first (PC) associated with any of (R), (G), or (B)) and a second pixel driving circuit (i.e., a second (PC) associated with any of (R), (G), or (B)) being in the first pixel region (again, see any of (R), (G), or (B) associated with any of (211), (212), or (213) in Fig. 5) and the second pixel region (again, see any other of (R), (G), or (B) associated with any of (211), (212), or (213) in Fig. 5), respectively, and the light emitting element (OLED) includes a first light emitting element (i.e., a first (OLED) associated with any of (R), (G), or (B)) and a second light emitting element (i.e., a second (PC) associated with any other of (R), (G), or (B)) electrically connected to the first pixel driving circuit (i.e., the first (PC) associated with any of (R), (G), or (B)) and the second pixel driving circuit (i.e., the second (PC) associated with any of (R), (G), or (B)), respectively (again, see Page 6, Para. [0095]-[0100] and Page 7, Para. [0109]-[0110]). As pertaining to Claim 4, Bae discloses (see Fig. 5 and Fig. 7) that the plurality of element regions (see (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5 corresponding to (P1, P2, P3) in Fig. 7) comprises a first-type element region (i.e., see any of (R), (G), or (B) associated with any of (211), (212), or (213) in Fig. 5) and a second-type element region (i.e., see any other of (R), (G), or (B) associated with any of (211), (212), or (213) in Fig. 5), the first light emitting element (i.e., the first (OLED) associated with any of (R), (G), or (B)) corresponding to the first-type element region (again, see any of (R), (G), or (B) associated with any of (211), (212), or (213) in Fig. 5) and the first light emitting element (i.e., a first (OLED) associated with any of (R), (G), or (B)) corresponding to the second-type element region (see any other of (R), (G), or (B) associated with any of (211), (212), or (213) in Fig. 5) generate light of different colors (i.e., any of red, green, and blue), and the second light emitting element (i.e., the second (OLED) associated with any other of (R), (G), or (B)) corresponding to the first-type element region (again, see any of (R), (G), or (B) associated with any of (211), (212), or (213) in Fig. 5) and the second light emitting element (i.e., the second (OLED) associated with any other of (R), (G), or (B)) corresponding to the second-type element region (again, see any other of (R), (G), or (B) associated with any of (211), (212), or (213) in Fig. 5) generate light of a same color (i.e., any of red, green, and blue; see Page 6, Para. [0093]-[0094]; and Page 7, Para. [0102] and [0109]). As pertaining to Claim 5, Bae discloses (see Fig. 5 and Fig. 7) that the plurality of element regions (see (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5 corresponding to (P1, P2, P3) in Fig. 7) define a plurality or rows (see Fig. 4), and the first-type element region (i.e., see any of (R), (G), or (B) associated with any of (211), (212), or (213) in Fig. 5) and the second-type element region (i.e., see any other of (R), (G), or (B) associated with any of (211), (212), or (213) in Fig. 5) alternate each other in each of the plurality of rows (again, see Fig. 4 and Page 7, Para. [0103]). As pertaining to Claim 6, Bae discloses (see Fig. 5 and Fig. 7) that the light emitting element (OLED) overlaps the opening (GR) in a plan view (see Page 6, Para. [0100]). As pertaining to Claim 7, Bae discloses (see Fig. 7) that the pixel driving circuit (PC) comprises a transistor (TFT) electrically connected to the light emitting element (OLED), and the transistor (TFT) does not overlap the opening (GR) in a plan view (again, see Fig. 7; and see Page 5, Para. [0074] and [0078]; and Page 8, Para. [0116]). As pertaining to Claim 8, Bae discloses (see Fig. 7) a data line (DL) electrically connected to the transistor (TFT), wherein the data line (DL) overlaps (i.e., is disposed above) the opening (GR; see Page 5, Para. [0074] and [0079]; and Page 8, Para. [0129]). As pertaining to Claim 9, Bae discloses (see Fig. 7) that the data line (DL) is on the organic layer (115; see Page 5, Para. [0074] and [0079]; and Page 8, Para. [0129]). As pertaining to Claim 10, Bae discloses (see Fig. 7) that the transistor (TFT) comprises a silicon transistor including a silicon semiconductor pattern and an oxide transistor including an oxide semiconductor pattern (see Page 8, Para. [0117]-[0121]), and the silicon semiconductor pattern and the oxide semiconductor pattern are on different ones of the plurality of inorganic layers (see (111, 112, 113) in Fig. 7; again, see Page 8, Para. [0117]-[0121]). As pertaining to Claim 11, Bae discloses (see Fig. 2) a thin film encapsulation layer (300) covering the light emitting element (OLED; see (200) in Fig. 2); an input sensor (400) on the thin film encapsulation layer (300); and a color filter (500) on the input sensor (400) and overlapping the light emitting element (OLED, 200) in a plan view (see Page 4, Para. [0065]-[0067] and [0070]). As pertaining to Claim 12, Bae discloses (see Fig. 2) that the display device is capable of being folded or rolled on a roller (see Page 4, Para. [0060]). As pertaining to Claim 13, Bae discloses (see Fig. 2) that each of the plurality of element regions (see (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5 corresponding to (P1, P2, P3) in Fig. 7) is completely surrounded by the boundary region (GR) in a plan view (see Fig. 4; and Page 6, Para. [0097]). As pertaining to Claim 14, Bae discloses (see Fig. 1, Fig. 5, and Fig. 7) a display device (1; see Page 4, Para. [0058] and [0060]) comprising: a base layer (see (100) in Fig. 7) including a plurality of element regions (see (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5 corresponding to (P1, P2, P3) in Fig. 7) and a boundary region (i.e., a groove (GR); see Fig. 7 corresponding to the spaces between (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5) adjacent to the plurality of element regions (again, see (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5 corresponding to (P1, P2, P3) in Fig. 7); a plurality of inorganic layers (see (111, 112, 113) in Fig. 7) on the base layer (100) and including an opening (see (GR) in Fig. 7) defined in at least some of the inorganic layers (111, 112, 113), the opening (GR) corresponding to the boundary region (again, see (GR) in Fig. 7 corresponding to the spaces between (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5), wherein the opening (GR) surrounds at least a first element region (i.e., see any of (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5 corresponding to any of (P1, P2, P3) in Fig. 7) among the plurality of element regions (see (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5 corresponding to (P1, P2, P3) in Fig. 7) in a plan view (see Page 6, Para. [0095]-[0100]); an organic layer (see (115) in Fig. 7) inside the opening (GR), on the plurality of inorganic layers (111, 112, 113), and overlapping the first element region (i.e., see any of (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5 corresponding to any of (P1, P2, P3) in Fig. 7) in plan view; a transistor (see (TFT) in Fig. 7) between the base layer (100) and the organic layer (115) and in the first element region (i.e., see any of (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5 corresponding to any of (P1, P2, P3) in Fig. 7); and a light emitting element (see (OLED) in Fig. 7) on the organic layer (115) and electrically connected to the transistor (TFT), wherein wherein an inner surface of the at least some of the inorganic layers (111, 112, 113) defining the opening (GR) surrounding the first element region (i.e., see any of (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5 corresponding to any of (P1, P2, P3) in Fig. 7) has a substantially polygonal shape (i.e., a rectangular shape; see (A1, A2, A3) in Fig. 5) in a plan view, the polygonal shape including vertex regions (see the corner regions of (A1, A2, A3)) each having an outwardly convex shape (see Fig. 5) in a plan view (see Page 7, Para. [0109]-[0110] and [0112]-[0113]; Page 8, Para. [0116]-[0119], [0121], and [0125]-[0128]; and Page 9, Para. [0136]). While Bae discloses that the inorganic stacked structure includes a vertex region (i.e., see the corner regions of (A1, A2, A3)) having an outwardly convex shape, Bae does not explicitly disclose that the vertex region has an outwardly convex curve shape. However, in the same field of endeavor, Tian discloses (see Fig. 2a and Fig. 3a) a display device comprising a base layer (10) including a plurality of element regions (P1, P2, P3) and a boundary region (i.e., see a boundary of (100)) adjacent to the plurality of element regions (P1, P2, P3), and a plurality of inorganic layers (i.e., see (11, 13, 15, 17)) on the base layer (10) and including an opening (300) corresponding to the boundary region (i.e., see the boundary of (100)), wherein the inorganic layers (11, 13, 15, 17) include an inorganic stacked structure defined by the opening (300) and in each of the plurality of element regions (P1, P2, P3), the opening (300) surrounds the inorganic stacked structure in a plan view (see Fig. 2a), the inorganic stacked structure has a substantially polygonal shape in a plan view and includes a vertex region (i.e., a corner region; again, see Fig. 2a) having an outwardly convex curve shape in a plan view (see Page 3 through Page 4, Para. [0041] and [0043]-[0046]). It is a goal of Tian to provide a display device that exhibits improved stretchability and/or flexibility and maintains the ability to resist stretch damage by including at least an inorganic stacked structure that has a substantially polygonal shape and includes a vertex region having an outwardly convex curve shape (see Fig. 2a and Page 3, Para. [0041] and Page 4, Para. [0047]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Bae with the teachings of Tian, such that the inorganic stacked structure that has a substantially polygonal shape and includes a vertex region having an outwardly convex curve shape in order to provide a display device that exhibits improved stretchability and/or flexibility and maintains the ability to resist stretch damage, as suggested by Tian. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to Claims 1-14 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on a combination of references applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. The applicant has argued that none of the references relied upon by the examiner in the prior Office Action, namely Bae, teach or fairly suggest an “inorganic stacked structure” that “has a substantially polygonal shape in a plan view and includes a vertex region… having an outwardly convex curve shape in a plan view.” It should be noted, as discussed during the Applicant-Initiated Interview of 08 October 2025, that the newly recited term “vertex region,” as opposed to the arbitrarily defined “corner region” previously recited in the claims, is intended to specifically reference the vertex of the claimed “inorganic stacked structure” in a plan view. That is, rather than referencing an arbitrary “region” of the claimed “inorganic stacked structure” near a corner of the “inorganic stacked structure,” the newly claimed “vertex region” is interpreted as specifically corresponding to the point where lines or edges meet to form a corner. In this regard, the newly claimed “vertex region having an outwardly convex curve shape in a plan view” requires an outwardly convex and curved vertex. In this regard, respectfully, the applicant’s argument is moot in so much as the combined teachings of Bae and Tian, as newly relied upon in the above rejections, clearly disclose the features of pending Claims 1-14. Therefore, the rejection of Claims 1-14 is maintained. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Wang et al. (US 2024 / 0188351) and Park et al. (US 2023 / 0049290) both disclose display devices having openings formed in inorganic stacked layers to form boundaries of element regions. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON M MANDEVILLE whose telephone number is (571)270-3136. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 7:30AM-4:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chanh Nguyen can be reached at 571-272-7772. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JASON M MANDEVILLE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2623
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 01, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 01, 2025
Interview Requested
Oct 02, 2025
Interview Requested
Oct 08, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 10, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 11, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Final Rejection — §103
Mar 30, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 08, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 08, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12579923
METHOD TO IMPLEMENT GLOBAL DIMMING FOR MICROLED DISPLAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571941
PLASTIC OPTICAL PRODUCT AND PLASTIC SPECTACLE LENS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573332
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR OPERATING DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573335
PIXEL CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12567357
ARRAY SUBSTRATE AND DETECTION METHOD THEREFOR, AND TILED DISPLAY PANEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+47.2%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 729 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month