Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/626,920

DIAGNOSTIC CATHETERS, GUIDE CATHETERS, VISUALIZATION DEVICES AND CHORD MANIPULATION DEVICES, AND RELATED KITS AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 04, 2024
Priority
Jan 20, 2009 — provisional 61/145,964 +9 more
Examiner
HALL, DEANNA K
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Ancora Heart, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
886 granted / 1171 resolved
+15.7% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1215
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
49.6%
+9.6% vs TC avg
§102
32.2%
-7.8% vs TC avg
§112
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1171 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Acknowledgments This office action is in response to the preliminary amendment filed on 11/8/24. Claims 26-46 are pending. Information Disclosure Statement 3. The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 9/2/25 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97(b). Accordingly, the IDS is being considered by the Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 4. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 5. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. 6. Claims 26-46 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Legaspi et al. (US 2009/0287187) (“Legaspi”). Legaspi discloses: A kit for accessing a subvalvular space of a heart comprising: one or more first guide catheters, the one or more first guide catheters comprising an elongate member, a distal end, and a lumen therethrough, the distal end having a deformable portion comprising a plurality of segments having different durometers along a length thereof; and a catheter comprising a deflectable wire. [0074-0075] further comprising one or more diagnostic catheters, the one or more diagnostic catheters comprising a preformed arch curve region and a preformed valve curve region. ([0074-0075], “any of a variety of catheters and intralumenal instruments may be configured with one or more deformation zones” …”used for other therapeutic and diagnostic procedures, including but not limited to access…”; in [0074] embodiments of various devices usable with embodiments of the invention of Legaspi are described—see particularly 11/583,627 incorporated by reference (US Pat 8,388,680 to Starksen). In this patent “any of the catheters described may be pre-shaped or pre-formed C3L6-12,C8L33-47) claims 27-30,35-38: Given the above passages regarding the pre-formed curves and configurations with deformation zones, it is within the skill of one of ordinary skill in the art to use catheters with preforms according to claims 27-30,35-38 as a matter of obvious design choice. the preformed arch curve region corresponds to a curve of an aortic arch. a length of each of the plurality of segments is the same; a length of each of the plurality of segments is about 2.0 mm. [0059] (actual length is a design choice that would be measurable based on the pre-form desired shape) a first segment of the plurality segments has a Shore D durometer of 40; a second segment of the plurality of segments has a Shore D durometer of 55. [0045,0053] the one or more diagnostic catheters is configured to inject a radiopaque contrast agent into the subvalvular space. [0075] (see Starksen C12L37-47 the one or more diagnostic catheters comprises an ultrasonic transducer. [0075] further comprising a second guide catheter 120 (tunnel catheter 410 as in Figs. 4A-I, Starksen) comprising a lumen and a curved distal portion, the second guide catheter configured for advancement through the lumen of the one or more first guide catheters and positioning in the subvalvular space of a mitral valve and around at least a portion of a circumference of a left ventricle. [0074] further comprising a tunnel catheter configured for advancement through the first guide catheter lumen, the tunnel catheter comprising at least one opening to facilitate deployment of an anchor 122,(426 Starksen) into tissue of the left ventricle. the anchor is coupled to a tether [0074] (422 Starksen) further comprising one or more termination devices; a locking device, a cutting device, or a combination locking and cutting device. See Starksen C2L40-47 further comprising a guidewire 118 Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DEANNA K HALL whose telephone number is (571)272-2819. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30am- 4:30pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kevin Sirmons can be reached at 571-272-4965. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DEANNA K HALL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 04, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746381
COUPLING APPARATUS FOR INFUSION DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12734300
DEVICES AND METHODS FOR PRECISION DOSE DELIVERY
4y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728221
APPARATUSES AND METHODS TO ACTIVATE MUSCLES OF DEGLUTITION TO PROMOTE DYSPHAGIA RECOVERY IN NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12721983
Carrier Element for Micro-Needles, and Micro-Needle Array Device
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12708754
MEDICAL CONNECTOR
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+15.7%)
3y 2m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1171 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month