Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Ancora Heart, Inc.

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (25%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (75%)
No statute on record1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ORKIN, ALEXANDER J 1 65.4% +27.0%
MCEVOY, THOMAS M 1 70.9% +35.6%
SPENCER, MAXIMILIAN TOBIAS 1 32.8% +32.3%
ALEMAN, SARAH WEBB 1 62.2% +23.2%

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17033283 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RESHAPING A HEART VENTRICLE MCEVOY, THOMAS M 91d overdue
16924051 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VARIABLE STIFFNESS TETHERS SPENCER, MAXIMILIAN TOBIAS 60d overdue
14814383 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CARDIAC REMODELING ALEMAN, SARAH WEBB 46d overdue
18795072 MULTI-WINDOW GUIDE TUNNEL ORKIN, ALEXANDER J 1d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3771 2
3774 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18795072 MULTI-WINDOW GUIDE TUNNEL ORKIN, ALEXANDER J 3771 Other Non-Final OA 1d overdue Pending Aug 05, 2024
17033283 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RESHAPING A HEART VENTRICLE MCEVOY, THOMAS M 3771 §103 Final Rejection 91d overdue Pending Sep 25, 2020
16924051 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VARIABLE STIFFNESS TETHERS SPENCER, MAXIMILIAN TOBIAS 3774 §103 Final Rejection 60d overdue Pending Jul 08, 2020
14814383 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CARDIAC REMODELING ALEMAN, SARAH WEBB 3774 §103 Non-Final OA 46d overdue Pending Jul 30, 2015

Managing Ancora Heart, Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month