Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Ancora Heart, Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 3 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Ancora Heart, Inc. is currently managing 5 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These 5 pending office actions are distributed among 5 distinct examiners, meaning each examiner is responsible for a single action. The workload is spread across 3 distinct art units, indicating some technical variety within their primary field. The presence of 3 distinct art units suggests that the company's innovations in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering span several technical classifications.

TODD J SCHERBEL is identified as the busiest examiner for the company, though he is currently handling only 1 pending office action. This highlights the even distribution of the portfolio, as all 5 distinct examiners share the workload equally. With 5 pending office actions and 5 distinct examiners, the company is engaging with a diverse set of examiner perspectives. This decentralized approach within 3 distinct art units is a key feature of their current prosecution profile.

Managing the current pending workload across 5 distinct examiners requires the company to adapt to multiple individual examination styles. Practitioners should be prepared for different procedural requirements across the 3 distinct art units. This profile reflects a small but technically varied set of active patent applications. The company's immediate prosecution goals are tied to the 5 pending office actions currently under review by the 5 distinct examiners.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
3
Medium (60%)
1
Easy (20%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (60%)
Double-patenting only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
60% of docket
2
Business / Other
40% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SCHERBEL, TODD J 1 76.2% +52.3%
HALL, DEANNA K 1 75.7% +15.7%
VOKES, KATHLEEN PAIGE 1 55.1% +25.9%
LAUER, CHRISTINA C 1 68.6% +14.7%
ALEMAN, SARAH WEBB 1 62.1% +23.7%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17149493 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR POSITIONING A GUIDEWIRE VOKES, KATHLEEN PAIGE —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
14814383 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CARDIAC REMODELING ALEMAN, SARAH WEBB 46d overdue
19052537 MYOCARDIAL IMPLANT LOAD SHARING DEVICE AND METHODS TO PROMOTE LV FUNCTION SCHERBEL, TODD J —
18626920 DIAGNOSTIC CATHETERS, GUIDE CATHETERS, VISUALIZATION DEVICES AND CHORD MANIPULATION DEVICES, AND RELATED KITS AND METHODS HALL, DEANNA K —
17149493 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR POSITIONING A GUIDEWIRE VOKES, KATHLEEN PAIGE —
16853384 ANCHOR DEPLOYMENT DEVICES AND RELATED METHODS LAUER, CHRISTINA C —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3783 1
3771 1
3774 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19052537 MYOCARDIAL IMPLANT LOAD SHARING DEVICE AND METHODS TO PROMOTE LV FUNCTION SCHERBEL, TODD J — DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 13, 2025
18626920 DIAGNOSTIC CATHETERS, GUIDE CATHETERS, VISUALIZATION DEVICES AND CHORD MANIPULATION DEVICES, AND RELATED KITS AND METHODS HALL, DEANNA K — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 04, 2024
17149493 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR POSITIONING A GUIDEWIRE VOKES, KATHLEEN PAIGE 3783 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 14, 2021
16853384 ANCHOR DEPLOYMENT DEVICES AND RELATED METHODS LAUER, CHRISTINA C 3771 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 20, 2020
14814383 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CARDIAC REMODELING ALEMAN, SARAH WEBB 3774 §103 Final Rejection 46d overdue Pending Jul 30, 2015

Managing Ancora Heart, Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month