Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/627,647

ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 05, 2024
Examiner
MUIR, MATTHEW SINCLAIR
Art Unit
2835
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Yokogawa Electric Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
73 granted / 108 resolved
At TC average
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+39.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
137
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
50.9%
+10.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
§112
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 108 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 5 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Beissert (US 20220256723 A1). As to Claim 1, Beissert discloses: An electronic device (field device 1) comprising: a container (housing 11); a partition wall (partition wall 13) dividing a space within the container 11 (Par. 0024 “housing comprises a first housing chamber 12.1 and a second housing chamber 12.2, which are separated by a partition wall 13”); a through-hole 13.1 provided in the partition wall 13 (Par. 0024 “The partition wall has a through-opening 13.1”); an electrical connection component (electrical feedthrough 14) attached to the partition wall 13 so as to be removable from the container 11 and having an insertion portion (carrier body 14.1 inserted through 13) inserted into the through-hole 13 (Par. 0027 “The electrical feedthrough 14 has an electrically-insulating carrier body 14.1”; Par. 0031 “the carrier body can easily be inserted into the housing wall via a clearance fit, which clearance fit transitions into a press fit, for example”; Par. 0025 “The measurement/operating electronics unit and the interface electronics unit are connected by means of an electrical feedthrough 14, which electrical feedthrough is arranged in the through-opening”); a first electronic component 16.1 attachable to the electrical connection component 14 (Par. 0030 “The carrier body has a longitudinal axis 14.2, wherein a connecting element 14.1 for electrically connecting the measurement/operating electronics unit 16.1 to the interface electronics unit 16.2 is arranged in holes 14.4 of the carrier body in each case”) on one side of the partition wall 13 (disposed in chamber 12.1) so as to be removable from the container 11 (16.1 is capable of being removed from housing 11); and a second electronic component 16.2 attachable to the electrical connection component 14 (see Par. 0030 above) on another side of the partition wall 13 (disposed in housing chamber 12.2) so as to be removable from the container 11 (16.2 is capable of being removed from housing 11), wherein the first electronic component 16.1 and the second electronic component 16.2 can be electrically connected to each other via the electrical connection component 14 by each being attached to the electrical connection component 14 (Par. 0030 “The carrier body has a longitudinal axis 14.2, wherein a connecting element 14.1 for electrically connecting the measurement/operating electronics unit 16.1 to the interface electronics unit 16.2 is arranged in holes 14.4 of the carrier body in each case”; Par. 0037 “A feedthrough 14 according to the invention as described above is configured to electrically connect the measurement/operating electronics unit to the interface electronics unit”). As to Claim 5, Beissert discloses: wherein one of the first electronic component 16.1 and the second electronic component 16.2 is an amplifier component (Par. 0025 “The measurement/operating electronics unit is configured to acquire measurement signals of a measuring transducer and to provide measured values for a measurand represented by the measurement signals. The interface electronics unit is configured, for example, to enable measured values to be read out”; 16.1 transmits electrical signal to 16.2, see [0034] of applicant’s spec. detailing an amplifier “The amplifier component transmits an electrical signal to the terminal component”) and the other of the first electronic component 16.1 and the second electronic component 16.2 is a terminal component (Par. 0025 “The interface electronics unit is configured, for example, to enable measured values to be read out or a supply line to be connected”; Par. 0006 “an interface electronics unit for connecting lines for supplying power to the field device”; 16.2 provides power to field device; see [0034] of applicant’s spec. detailing terminal component “The terminal component transmits electric power to the amplifier component”). As to Claim 10, Beissert discloses: wherein the electronic device is configured as a field device (Par. 0024 “FIG. 1 illustrates a cross-section through a housing module 10 of a field device 1”). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Beissert (US 20220256723 A1) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Nelson (US 8031453 B2). As to Claim 2, Beissert discloses: wherein the container (housing 11) includes a container body (housing wall 11.1). Beissert does not disclose: wherein the container includes a container body forming a first opening through which the first electronic component can pass at the one side of the partition wall, and a first lid capable of opening the first opening. However, Nelson discloses: wherein the container (housing 202; Fig. 2) includes a container body 202 forming a first opening (opening of compartment 206) through which the first electronic component 212 can pass at the one side of the partition wall 204 (corresponds to 13 of Beissert), and a first lid 210 capable of opening the first opening (col. 3, Lines 21-24 “a first housing cover 210 is generally round and has threads that screw into threads on the housing 202 to enclose industrial process instrument or field device electronics 212 in the electronics compartment 206”); in order to provide a screwed in cover to enclose electronics 212 within the compartment 206 (col. 3, Lines 21-24). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the related art(s) before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Beissert as further suggested by Nelson e.g., providing: wherein the container includes a container body forming a first opening through which the first electronic component can pass at the one side of the partition wall, and a first lid capable of opening the first opening; in order to provide a screwed in cover to enclose electronics within the compartment. Additionally, all claimed elements were known in the prior art and one skilled in the art could have combined/modified the elements as claimed by known methods with no change in their respective functions, and the combination/modification would have yielded predictable results to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. See KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S.___, 82 USPQ2d 1385 (2007). As to Claim 3, the obvious modification of Beissert in view of Nelson discloses: wherein the first opening (opening of compartment 206 of Nelson) is configured to allow the electrical connection component (230, corresponds to 14 of Beissert) to pass through the first opening (230 is capable of being inserted and removed via compartment 206 when cover 210 is removed; Nelson). As to Claim 4, the obvious modification of Beissert in view of Nelson does not explicitly disclose: wherein the container body forms a second opening through which the second electronic component can pass at the other side of the partition wall, and the container includes a second lid capable of opening the second opening. However, Nelson further discloses: wherein the container body 202 forms a second opening (opening of compartment 208) through which the second electronic component 216 can pass at the other side of the partition wall 204 (corresponds to 13 of Beissert), and the container 202 includes a second lid 214 capable of opening the second opening (col. 3, Lines 25-27 “A second housing cover 214 is generally round and has threads that screw into threads on the housing 202 to enclose a battery assembly 216 in the battery compartment 208”); in order to provide a screwed in cover to enclose assembly 216 within the compartment 208 (col. 3, Lines 25-27). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the related art(s) before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Beissert in view of Nelson as further suggested by Nelson e.g., providing: wherein the container body forms a second opening through which the second electronic component can pass at the other side of the partition wall, and the container includes a second lid capable of opening the second opening; in order to provide a screwed in cover to enclose an assembly within the compartment. Claims 6-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Beissert (US 20220256723 A1) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Behm (US 6898980 B2). As to Claim 6, Beissert discloses: wherein the first electronic component includes a substrate and a first connector mounted on the substrate, and the first electronic component 16.1 is fixed to the partition wall 13 by being attached to the electrical connection component 14 (Par. 0025 “The measurement/operating electronics unit and the interface electronics unit are connected by means of an electrical feedthrough 14, which electrical feedthrough is arranged in the through-opening”). Beissert does not disclose: wherein the first electronic component includes a substrate and a first connector mounted on the substrate, and the first electronic component is fixed to the partition wall by being attached to the electrical connection component via the first connector. However, Behm discloses: wherein the first electronic component (circuit 114) includes a substrate 114 and a first connector 122 mounted on the substrate 114 (col. 6, Lines 27-30 “The feedthrough 120 has external conductors 122 that energize the circuit 114, provide the sensor output 118, and receive configuration commands”; 122 mounted on 14, see Fig. 7), and the first electronic component 114 is fixed to the partition wall (fitting 110, corresponds to 13 of Beissert) by being attached to the electrical connection component 120 via the first connector 122 (122 is connected to feedthrough 120); in order to energize the circuit 114 and receive configuration commands (col. 6, Lines 27-30). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the related art(s) before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Beissert as further suggested by Behm e.g., providing: wherein the first electronic component includes a substrate and a first connector mounted on the substrate, and the first electronic component is fixed to the partition wall by being attached to the electrical connection component via the first connector; in order to energize the components and receive configuration commands. As to Claim 7, Beissert discloses: the second electronic component 16.2 is fixed to the partition wall 13 by being attached to the electrical connection component 14 (Par. 0025 “The measurement/operating electronics unit and the interface electronics unit are connected by means of an electrical feedthrough 14, which electrical feedthrough is arranged in the through-opening”). Beissert does not disclose: wherein the second electronic component includes a substrate and a second connector mounted on the substrate, and the second electronic component is fixed to the partition wall by being attached to the electrical connection component via the second connector. However, Behm discloses: wherein the second electronic component (circuit 172) includes a substrate 172 and a second connector 174 mounted on the substrate 172 (col. 7, Lines 27-29 “A circuit 172 in the cavity 164 is wired to a plug 174 that mates with the feedthrough 120 of the unitized sensor module”), and the second electronic component 172 is fixed to the partition wall (110, corresponds to 13 of Beissert) by being attached to the electrical connection component 120 via the second connector 174 (174 is connected to feedthrough 120); in order to receive a sensor output and generate a scalable output (col. 7, Lines 29-32). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the related art(s) before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Beissert as further suggested by Behm e.g., providing: wherein the second electronic component includes a substrate and a second connector mounted on the substrate, and the second electronic component is fixed to the partition wall by being attached to the electrical connection component via the second connector; in order to receive a sensor output and generate a scalable output. As to Claim 8, Beissert does not disclose: further comprising a partition wall sealing member surrounding the insertion portion of the electrical connection component so as to seal a gap between the partition wall and the electrical connection component. However, Behm discloses: further comprising a partition wall sealing member 146 (col. 6, Lines 65-66 “Fitting 110 includes an outer surface 146 to seal to transmitter module 132”) surrounding the insertion portion (fitting 110) of the electrical connection component (feedthrough 120; corresponds to 14 of Beissert) so as to seal a gap between the partition wall (portion of module 132, corresponds to 13 of Beissert) and the electrical connection component 120; in order to seal fitting 110 to transmitter module (col. 6, Lines 65-66) contributing to the flame and explosion proofing of the housing (col. 7, Lines 13-15). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the related art(s) before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Beissert as further suggested by Behm e.g., providing: further comprising a partition wall sealing member surrounding the insertion portion of the electrical connection component so as to seal a gap between the partition wall and the electrical connection component; in order to seal fitting/connection component to the partition wall contributing to the flame and explosion proofing of the housing/device. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Beissert (US 20220256723 A1) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Nelson (US 8031453 B2) and Perrault (US 8223478 B2). As to Claim 9, Beissert discloses: wherein the container 11 includes a container body (housing wall 11.1), the container body 11.1 includes the partition wall 13 (13 within 11.1). Beissert does not explicitly disclose: wherein the container includes a container body forming a first opening through which the first electronic component can pass at the one side of the partition wall and a second opening through which the second electronic component can pass at the other side of the partition wall, a first lid capable of opening the first opening, and a second lid capable of opening the second opening, and the container body, the first lid, the second lid, and the electrical connection component form an explosion-proof structure. However, Nelson discloses: wherein the container (housing 202; Fig. 2) includes a container body 202 forming a first opening (opening of compartment 206) through which the first electronic component 212 can pass at the one side of the partition wall 204 (corresponds to 13 of Beissert) and a second opening (opening of compartment 208) through which the second electronic component 216 can pass at the other side of the partition wall 204 (corresponds to 13 of Beissert), a first lid 210 capable of opening the first opening (col. 3, Lines 21-24 “a first housing cover 210 is generally round and has threads that screw into threads on the housing 202 to enclose industrial process instrument or field device electronics 212 in the electronics compartment 206”), and a second lid 214 capable of opening the second opening (col. 3, Lines 25-27 “A second housing cover 214 is generally round and has threads that screw into threads on the housing 202 to enclose a battery assembly 216 in the battery compartment 208”); in order to provide screwed in covers to enclose electronics 212 and assembly 216 within the compartments 206, 208 (col. 3, Lines 21-27). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the related art(s) before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Beissert as further suggested by Nelson e.g., providing: wherein the container includes a container body forming a first opening through which the first electronic component can pass at the one side of the partition wall and a second opening through which the second electronic component can pass at the other side of the partition wall, a first lid capable of opening the first opening, and a second lid capable of opening the second opening; in order to provide screwed in covers to enclose electronics and an assembly within the compartments. Further, Perrault further discloses: the container body (housing 48, Fig. 2A), the first lid 50A, the second lid 50B, and the electrical connection component (connectors 60A,B, 62A,B) form an explosion-proof structure (col. 5, Lines 27-31 “An explosion-proof flame path and environmental seal (for simplicity, the environmental seal is not shown in FIG. 2A) can be provided between the covers 50A and 50B and the housing 48, such that the field device 42 creates a sealed and explosion-proof enclosure”); in order to provide an explosion proof field device able to suitably withstand operating environment conditions (col. 1, Lines 16-20). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the related art(s) before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Beissert in view of Nelson as further suggested by Perrault e.g., providing: the container body, the first lid, the second lid, and the electrical connection component form an explosion-proof structure; in order to provide an explosion proof field device able to suitably withstand operating environment conditions. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Erkelenz (US 20190011295 A1) and Maier (US 6366436 B1) disclose an explosion proof field device. McGuire (US 8852775 B2) discloses a sealed field device with a feedthrough. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW S MUIR whose telephone number is (571)270-1329. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8 am - 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jayprakash Gandhi can be reached at (571)272-3740. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW SINCLAIR MUIR/ Examiner, Art Unit 2835 /Jayprakash N Gandhi/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2835
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 05, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598727
DOUBLE SIDED DISPLAY ASSEMBLY WITH BI-DIRECTIONAL FLOW THROUGH A COMMON, PARTITIONED HEAT EXCHANGER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588170
IN-VEHICLE DEVICE INCLUDING COOLING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588164
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ELECTRONICS COOLING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575064
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COOLING POWER ELECTRONICS USING A THERMOSYPHON
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12557247
COOLING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+39.1%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 108 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month