Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/629,346

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 08, 2024
Priority
May 03, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0057523 +4 more
Examiner
ZHU, SHENG-BAI
Art Unit
2897
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
SK hynix Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
68%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
444 granted / 714 resolved
-5.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
64 currently pending
Career history
780
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
95.1%
+55.1% vs TC avg
§102
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§112
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 714 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Detailed Action Specification Objection The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections – 35 U.S.C. 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1, 2, 5 and 8-10 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sano (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2016/0322374), in view of Kim (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2022/0139831). Regarding Claim 1 FIG. 14 of Sano discloses a semiconductor device comprising: a first gate structure including a plurality of first conductive layers (46E-46F) that are alternately stacked with a plurality of first insulating layers (32); a second gate structure including a plurality of second conductive layers (46C-46D) that are alternately stacked with a plurality of second insulating layers; a third gate structure including a plurality of third conductive layers (46A-46B) that are alternately stacked with a plurality of third insulating layers; and a first contact plug (66A) extending into the first gate structure through the third gate structure and the second gate structure, the first contact plug connected to a first (bottom contact pad) of the plurality of first conductive layers. Sano is silent with respect to “the first contact plug including a first inflection portion located at an interface between the second gate structure and the third gate structure”. FIG. 3 of Kim discloses a similar semiconductor device, wherein the first contact plug (136) including a first inflection portion located at an interface between the second gate structure (LS) and the third gate structure (LS). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of the claimed invention to modify the device of Sano, as taught by Kim. The ordinary artisan would have been motivated to modify Sano in the above manner for purpose of providing a semiconductor device which may improve integration density and reliability ([0004] of Kim). Regarding Claim 2 FIG. 3 of Kim discloses the first contact plug comprises: a first sub-contact plug extending into the first gate structure through the second gate structure and connected to the first of the plurality of first conductive layers; and a second sub-contact plug connected to the first sub-contact plug through the third gate structure; wherein a width of the first sub-contact plug is different from a width of the second sub-contact plug at the first inflection portion; and wherein the first inflection portion is formed at an interface where the first sub-contact plug and the second sub-contact plug meet. Regarding Claim 5 FIG. 14 of Sano discloses a plurality of second contact plugs (66C, 66D) extending into the second gate structure through the third gate structure, wherein each of the plurality of second contact plugs is connected to a different one of the plurality of second conductive layers. Regarding Claim 8 FIG. 14 of Sano discloses a plurality of third contact plugs(66E, 66F) located in the third gate structure, wherein each of the plurality of third contact plugs is connected to a different one of the plurality of third conductive layers. Regarding Claim 9 FIG. 3 of Kim discloses at least one channel structure (81) extending through the third gate structure, the second gate structure, and the first gate structure, wherein the at least one channel structure includes a second inflection portion located at an interface between the first gate structure and the second gate structure and a third inflection portion located at an interface between the second gate structure and the third gate structure. Regarding Claim 10 FIG. 3 of Kim discloses the first inflection portion includes a step in a sidewall at an interface between consecutive sections of the first contact plug. Claims 3, 4, 6 and 7 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sano and Kim, in view of Fukuda (U.S. Patent No. 2017/0256588). Regarding Claim 3 Sano as modified by Kim discloses Claim1, wherein the first contact plug comprises: a first sub-contact plug located in the first gate structure and the second gate structure, wherein; and a second sub-contact plug connected to the first sub-contact plug and extending through the third gate structure. Sano as modified by Kim is silent with respect to “the first sub-contact plug includes a first pad located in the first gate structure and extends into the first gate structure through the first pad and connected to the first of the plurality of first conductive layers”. FIG. 5 of Fukuda discloses a similar semiconductor device, wherein the first sub-contact plug includes a first pad (Z1b) located in the first gate structure and extends into the first gate structure through the first pad and connected to the first of the plurality of first conductive layers. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of the claimed invention to modify the device of Lee, as taught by Fukuda. The ordinary artisan would have been motivated to modify Lee in the above manner for purpose of increasing capacity ([0005] of Fukuda). Regarding Claim 4 FIG. 5 of Fukuda discloses the first pad protrudes from sidewalls of the first sub-contact plug. Regarding Claim 6 Modified Sano discloses each of the plurality of second contact plugs includes a second pad located in the second gate structure and extends into the second gate structure through the second pad. Regarding Claim 7 Modified Sano discloses the second pad protrudes from sidewalls of the second contact plug. Claims 11-17 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sano, in view of Fukuda (U.S. Patent No. 2017/0256588). Regarding Claim 11 FIG. 14 of Sano discloses a semiconductor device comprising: a first gate structure including a plurality of first conductive layers (46E-46F) that are alternately stacked with a plurality of first insulating layers (32); a second gate structure including a plurality of second conductive layers (46C-46D) that are alternately stacked with a plurality of second insulating layers; a third gate structure including a plurality of third conductive layers (46A-46B) that are alternately stacked with a plurality of third insulating layers; and a first contact plug (66A) extending into the first gate structure through the third gate structure and the second gate structure, wherein each of the plurality of first contact plugs is connected to a different one of the plurality of first conductive layers; and each of the plurality of second contact plugs is connected to a different one of the plurality of second conductive layers. Sano is silent with respect to “each of the plurality of first contact plugs includes a first pad located in the first gate structure, extends into the first gate structure through the first pad”. FIG. 13 of Fukuda discloses a similar semiconductor device, wherein each of the plurality of first contact plugs includes a first pad located in the first gate structure, extends into the first gate structure through the first pad. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of the claimed invention to modify the device of Lee, as taught by Fukuda. The ordinary artisan would have been motivated to modify Lee in the above manner for purpose of increasing capacity ([0005] of Fukuda). Regarding Claim 12 FIG. 13 of Fukuda discloses the second pad protrudes from sidewalls of the second contact plug. Regarding Claim 13 FIG. 5 of Fukuda discloses the first pad protrudes from sidewalls of at least one of the plurality of first contact plugs. Regarding Claim 14 FIG. 14 of Sano discloses a third gate structure including a plurality of third conductive layers (46A-46B) that are alternately stacked with a plurality of third insulating layers; and a first contact plug (66A) extending into the first gate structure through the third gate structure and the second gate structure, wherein each of the plurality of third contact plugs is connected to a different one of the plurality of the third conductive layers. Regarding Claim 15 FIG. 5 of Fukuda discloses each of the plurality of second contact plugs includes a second pad located in the second gate structure, extends into the second gate structure through the second pad, and is connected to a different one of the plurality of second conductive layers. Regarding Claim 16 Modified Sano discloses the second pad overlaps with an uppermost second conductive layer of the plurality of second conductive layers. Regarding Claim 17 Modified Sano discloses the second pad protrudes from sidewalls of the second contact plug. Claim 18 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sano and Fukuda, in view of Kim (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2022/0139831). Regarding Claim 18 Sano as modified by Fukuda discloses Claim14. Sano as modified by Fukuda is silent with respect to “the first contact plug includes an inflection portion located at an interface between the second gate structure and the third gate structure”. FIG. 3 of Kim discloses a similar semiconductor device, wherein the first contact plug (136) including a first inflection portion located at an interface between the second gate structure (LS) and the third gate structure (LS). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of the claimed invention to modify the device of Sano, as taught by Kim. The ordinary artisan would have been motivated to modify Sano in the above manner for purpose of providing a semiconductor device which may improve integration density and reliability ([0004] of Kim). Pertinent Art Mori (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2018/0277596), Yamashita (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2019/0279996), Lee (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2023/0223345) and Kim (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2023/0061301). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHENG-BAI ZHU whose telephone number is (571)270-3904. The examiner can normally be reached on 11am – 7pm EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chad Dicke can be reached on (571)270-7996. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHENG-BAI ZHU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681246
ELECTRONIC PACKAGE
4y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12660444
DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12653034
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVICES WITH CAPACITORS FOR TAMPER DETECTION
6y 9m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12641941
MULTI-COLOR LED PIXEL UNIT AND MICRO-LED DISPLAY PANEL
3y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12628639
POWER GATING SWITCH TREE STRUCTURE FOR REDUCED WAKE-UP TIME AND POWER LEAKAGE
3y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
68%
With Interview (+6.0%)
2y 9m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 714 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month