Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/630,865

LOAD DRIVING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 09, 2024
Examiner
IMTIAZ, ZOHEB S
Art Unit
2846
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
DENSO CORPORATION
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
369 granted / 460 resolved
+12.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
485
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
55.8%
+15.8% vs TC avg
§102
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
§112
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 460 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, 5 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Yamanaka US publication no.: US 2016/0297471 A1 Regarding claim 1, Yamanaka teaches, A load driving device, comprising: a power converter (inverter 20, figure 1) provided between a power supply line and a ground line connected to a battery (battery 13, figure 1), and configured to convert a direct-current power of the battery and supply it to a load (motor 80, figure 1); a booster circuit (booster 50, figure 1) configured to boost a voltage of the battery supplied via the power supply line (see paragraph 37, where the boost 50 is configured to boost the voltage from the battery); a post-boost capacitor (capacitor 54, figure 1) configured to be charged with a boosted voltage by the booster circuit; and a specific regulator (regulator 41 and 42, figure 1) configured to operate a target circuit when a voltage equal to or higher than a lower limit value is applied via a power supply path (see paragraphs 34-37, where it is explained that the regulators provide power to angle sensor and the torque sensor); wherein at least the voltage charged in the post-boost capacitor is applied to the specific regulator (see paragraphs 34-37, where it is explained that the regulators provide power to angle sensor and the torque sensor). Regarding claim 3, Yamanaka teaches, the load driving device according to claim 1, wherein the load is a motor (see motor 80, figure 1). Regarding claim 5, Yamanaka teaches, the load driving device according to claim 3, wherein the target circuit includes a rotation angle sensor that detects a rotation angle of the motor (see angle sensor 29, figure 1; paragraphs 34-37). Regarding claim 7, Yamanaka teaches, the load driving device according to claim 5, wherein the load is a steering assist motor of an electric power steering device (see figure 2 and paragraph 8, where the control for a power steering device is disclosed). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2, 4, 6 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yamanaka US publication no.: US 2016/0297471 A1 in view of Senkou et al. US publication no.: US 2012/0139460 A1. Regarding claim 2, Yamanaka teaches, A load driving device (see figure 1), comprising: a power converter (inverter 20, figure 1) provided between a power supply line and a ground line connected to a battery (battery 13, figure 1), and configured to convert a direct-current power of the battery and supply it to a load (motor 80, figure 1) ; and a specific regulator (regulator 41 and 42, figure 1) configured to operate a target circuit when a voltage equal to or higher than a lower limit value is applied via a power supply path (see paragraphs 34-37 where it is explained that the regulators operate based on a predetermined voltage). Yamanaka teaches a power steering device control system in which power is supplied to auxiliary devices via a charge in the storage but is silent on specifically teaching a regenerative aspect of it as seen below: a power converter capacitor connected in parallel with the power converter between the power supply line and the ground line, and configured to be charged with a voltage applied to the power converter; wherein at least a voltage charged in the power converter capacitor is applied to the specific regulator. However, Senkou et al. is in the same field of art (see application of power steering system, paragraph 257) and teach: a power converter capacitor (capacitor C2, figure 1) connected in parallel with the power converter (IV, figure 3) between the power supply line (battery 12, figure 1) and the ground line, and configured to be charged with a voltage applied to the power converter (see paragraph 53, “regenerative control mode”); wherein at least a voltage charged in the power converter capacitor is applied to the specific regulator (Voltage charged of the C2 would be applied to the regulators 41 and 42 of Yamanaka). In view of Senkou et al.’s teachings, it would’ve been obvious to one with the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, with the apparatus as taught by Yamanaka to include; a power converter capacitor connected in parallel with the power converter between the power supply line and the ground line, and configured to be charged with a voltage applied to the power converter; wherein at least a voltage charged in the power converter capacitor is applied to the specific regulator, for the purpose of improving the control of motor drive system. Regarding claim 4, Yamanaka teaches, the load driving device according to claim 2, wherein the load is a motor (see motor 80, figure 1). Regarding claim 6, Yamanaka teaches, the load driving device according to claim 4, wherein the target circuit includes a rotation angle sensor that detects a rotation angle of the motor (see angle sensor 29, figure 1; paragraphs 34-37). Regarding claim 8, Yamanaka teaches, the load driving device according to claim 6, wherein the load is a steering assist motor of an electric power steering device (see figure 2 and paragraph 8, where the control for a power steering device is disclosed). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZOHEB S IMTIAZ whose telephone number is (571)272-4308. The examiner can normally be reached 11am-730pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Colon Santana can be reached at 571-272-2060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZOHEB S IMTIAZ/Primary Examiner , Art Unit 2846
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 09, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 08, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 19, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 19, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603594
VOICE COIL MOTOR, METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING VOICE COIL MOTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603595
ELECTROMAGNETIC MOTOR SYSTEM, POSTION CONTROL SYSTEM, STAGE APPARATUS, LITHOGRAPHIC APPARATUS, METHOD OF DETERMINING A MOTOR-DEPENDENT COMMUTATION MODEL FOR AN ELECTROMAGNETIC MOTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603596
Power supply circuit in an inverter for driving an electrical machine, method of operating the power supply circuit and safety control device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592612
SYSTEM FOR DAMPING UNWANTED MOTOR MOVEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12580456
ROTOR POWER TRANSFER CIRCUIT FOR ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+14.3%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 460 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month