Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/632,763

WHEEL HUB DISCONNECT SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 11, 2024
Examiner
LEWIS, TISHA D
Art Unit
3619
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Fairfield Manufacturing Company Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
1083 granted / 1236 resolved
+35.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1263
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
51.5%
+11.5% vs TC avg
§102
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
§112
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1236 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The following is a first action on the merits of application serial no. 18/632763 filed 4/11/2024. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed 4/11/24 has been considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 9-13 and 16-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Plumb 4334590. As to claim 1, Plumb discloses a wheel disconnect system, comprising: a wheel hub disconnect cap (79), the wheel hub disconnect cap comprising a circular head (as shown in Figures 2 and 3) and a circular shank (formed within 79 encompassing all components as shown in Figures 1-3), a first through hole (encompassing 92), and a second through hole (encompassing 92). As to claim 2, further comprising a first slot in communication with the first through hole and a second slot in communication with the second through hole (both encompassing 92). As to claim 9, further comprising a first threaded fastener passing through the wheel hub disconnect cap and a second threaded fastener passing through the wheel hub disconnect cap (via 92). As to claim 10, further comprising a wheel hub (10), the circular shank inserted at least partially into the wheel hub via a through hole in the wheel hub (within 10). As to claim 11, further comprising a first bore hole in the wheel hub configured to receive the first threaded fastener, a second bore hole in the wheel hub configured to receive the second threaded fastener (Figure 1, via 92 connecting 79 to 27). As to claim 12, Plumb discloses a method for constructing a wheel disconnect system, comprising: fastening a sun gear (20) to a wheel hub disconnect cap (79); inserting the wheel hub disconnect cap into a wheel hub cover (Figure 1, via 92 connecting 79 to 27); and installing a retaining ring (102) to the wheel hub disconnect cap to retain the wheel hub disconnect cap to the wheel hub cover. As to claim 13, further comprising installing two fasteners through the wheel hub disconnect cap and into the wheel hub cover (via 92). As to claim 16, Plumb discloses a wheel disconnect system, comprising: wheel hub carrier (11); a wheel hub (10) fastened to the wheel hub carrier; an electric machine (column 2, lines 45-48 describes that any power source can be used which would encompass electric machine) fastened to the wheel hub carrier; and a wheel hub disconnect cap (79) fastened to the wheel hub, the wheel hub disconnect cap comprising a circular head (as shown in Figures 2 and 3) and a circular shank (formed within 79 encompassing all components as shown in Figures 1-3), a first through hole (encompassing 92), and a second through hole (encompassing 92). As to claim 17, further comprising a sun gear (20) fastened to the wheel hub disconnect cap (via 80, 83, 85), and where the sun gear remains in contact with a rotor shaft of the electric machine when the wheel disconnect system is engaged and disengaged (due to power sources outputting power through 12 and sun gear 20 being directly coupled to 12). As to claim 18, further comprising a planetary gear (21) in selective communication with the sun gear. As to claim 19, further comprising a first fastener passing through the first through hole and a second fastener passing through the second through hole (via 92). As to claim 20, further comprising a retaining ring retaining (102) the wheel hub disconnect cap to the wheel hub. Claim(s) 1, 2, and 9-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Simonsen 2854111. As to claim 1, Simonsen discloses a wheel disconnect system, comprising: a wheel hub disconnect cap (17), the wheel hub disconnect cap comprising a circular head (as shown in Figure 1) and a circular shank (formed within 17 encompassing 31 as shown in Figures 4 and 5), a first through hole (encompassing 12), and a second through hole (encompassing 12). As to claim 2, further comprising a first slot in communication with the first through hole and a second slot in communication with the second through hole (both encompassing 12). As to claim 9, further comprising a first threaded fastener passing through the wheel hub disconnect cap and a second threaded fastener passing through the wheel hub disconnect cap (via 12). As to claim 10, further comprising a wheel hub (11, 15), the circular shank inserted at least partially into the wheel hub via a through hole in the wheel hub (within 15). As to claim 11, further comprising a first bore hole in the wheel hub configured to receive the first threaded fastener, a second bore hole in the wheel hub configured to receive the second threaded fastener (as shown in Figures 3 and 6). As to claim 12, Simonsen discloses a method for constructing a wheel disconnect system, comprising: fastening a sun gear (29) to a wheel hub disconnect cap (17); inserting the wheel hub disconnect cap into a wheel hub cover (Figure 1, via 12 connecting 17 to 15); and installing a retaining ring (33) to the wheel hub disconnect cap to retain the wheel hub disconnect cap to the wheel hub cover. As to claim 13, further comprising installing two fasteners through the wheel hub disconnect cap and into the wheel hub cover (via 12). As to claim 14, further comprising fastening the wheel hub cover (15) to a wheel hub and seating a head of the wheel hub disconnect cap against the wheel hub cover (portions of 17 coupled to 15) to engage the sun gear to a splined shaft (13). As to claim 15, further comprising rotating the wheel hub disconnect cap (via 33) and tightening the two fasteners (12) to the wheel hub disconnect cap. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Plumb and Simonsen in view of Fanizza et al 20220363091. As to claim 3, both Plumb and Simonsen disclose first and second slots, but doesn’t disclose counterbores adjacent to the slots as recited. Fanizza discloses a wheel system and shows that it is well known in the art to provide a wheel cover connection to a wheel hub by applying multiple counterbores adjacent slots (key holes as shown in Figures 11-16). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide Plumb and Simonsen with slot adjacent counterbores for bolts in view of Fanizza to reduce the manufacturing costs and assembly work time when connecting and disconnecting cap to and from hub. As to claim 4, Plumb and Simonsen disclose a retaining ring slot (via 36 in Simonsen and encompassing 102 in Plumb). As to claim 5, Plumb and Simonsen disclose a first bore hole in the circular shank (encompassing 32 in Simonsen and encompassing 102 in Plumb) and a second bore hole in the circular shank (encompassing 31 in Simonsen and encompassing 85 in Plumb) As to claim 6, Plumb and Simonsen disclose where the first bore hole is concentric with the second bore hole (as shown in Figures 4 and 5 in Simonsen and Figures 2 and 3 in Plumb). As to claim 7, Simonsen further comprising a sun gear retainer (via 32) at least partially inserted into the first bore hole, a sun gear (29) at least partially inserted into the second bore hole (via integral connection to 31), the sun gear retained to the wheel hub disconnect cap via the sun gear retainer. As to claim 8, Simonsen further comprising a retaining ring (33) at least partially inserted into the retaining ring slot. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. -Schoon 20120238389 (Figure 4) and Schoon 20130161148 (Figure 1) both show that it is well known in the art to provide a wheel hub disconnect system coupled to an electric machine and provided with a “shank” type coupling within a hub cap, meets limitations of at least claims 1 and 16. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TISHA D LEWIS whose telephone number is (571)272-7093. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri: 8:30am to 5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anna M Momper can be reached at 571-270-5788. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Tdl /TISHA D LEWIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3619 April 18, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 11, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12626685
ELECTRIC ROAD VEHICLE PROVIDED WITH A REPRODUCTION DEVICE FOR THE REALIZATION OF A SOUND ASSOCIABLE WITH A GEAR SHIFT AND RELATED METHOD
1y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12617296
HYBRID POWERTRAIN SYSTEM AND METHOD
1y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12612132
Data Processing Device and Computer-Implemented Method for Synchronized Shifting of Bicycle Gearboxes, Bicycle Gearbox and Method of Operating the Same
1y 11m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12612955
MODULAR THREE-SPEED TRANSMISSION FOR AN ELECTRIC DRIVE SYSTEM
1y 3m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12606005
HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE
1y 3m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+9.6%)
2y 2m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1236 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month