Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/633,518

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 12, 2024
Priority
Oct 20, 2020 — RE 10-2020-0135809 +1 more
Examiner
SOWARD, IDA M
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allowance Rate
1260 granted / 1351 resolved
+25.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
1383
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
48.0%
+8.0% vs TC avg
§102
29.0%
-11.0% vs TC avg
§112
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1351 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is in response to the application filed April 12, 2024. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING EDGE PROTECTION UNIT. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Jeong et al. (EP 3460622 A2). The applied reference has a common assignee with the instant application. Based upon the earlier effectively filed date of the reference, it constitutes prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2). This rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) might be overcome by: (1) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(a) that the subject matter disclosed in the reference was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor of this application and is thus not prior art in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(A); (2) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(b) of a prior public disclosure under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) if the same invention is not being claimed; or (3) a statement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) establishing that, not later than the effective filing date of the claimed invention, the subject matter disclosed in the reference and the claimed invention were either owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person or subject to a joint research agreement. In regard to claim 1, Jeong et al. teach a display device comprising: a substrate 100 including a first area 1A, a second area 2A, and a bent area BA, wherein the bent area BA is connected between the first area 1A and the second area 2A, is bent according to a bending axis BAX; a display element 300 on the substrate 100; and an edge protection unit (in 2A) comprising an organic insulating layer 260 (140a/150a/170a), the edge protection unit (in 2A) arranged at an edge of the substrate 100, wherein the edge protection unit (in 2A) extends from a portion of the substrate 100 to the end of the substrate 100 (Figures 1 and 6-7, pages 10-34). In regard to claim 2, Jeong et al. teach a planarization layer 140 spaced from the organic insulating layer and positioned between the display element 300 and the substrate 100; a pixel-defining layer 150 spaced from the organic insulating layer 260 and directly contacting the display element 300; and a spacer 170 spaced from the organic insulating layer 260, wherein the pixel-defining layer 150 is positioned between the spacer 170 and the substrate 100, and wherein the organic insulating layer 260 is formed of a same material as at least one of the planarization layer 140, the pixel-defining layer 150, and the spacer 170 (Figures 1 and 6-7, pages 10-34). In regard to claim 3, Jeong et al. teach an inorganic insulating layer 125 (110/121/122/130) arranged between the substrate 100 and the organic insulating layer 260 (Figures 1 and 6-7, pages 10-34). In regard to claim 4, Jeong et al. teach the inorganic insulating layer 125 is positioned between the second area 2A and the organic insulating layer 260 (Figures 1 and 6-7, pages 10-34). In regard to claim 5, Jeong et al. teach a buffer layer 110 arranged between the substrate 100 and the organic insulating layer 260 (Figures 1 and 6-7, pages 10-34). In regard to claim 6, Jeong et al. teach the buffer layer 110 is positioned between the organic insulating layer 260 and the first area 1A (Figures 1 and 6-7, pages 10-34). In regard to claim 7, Jeong et al. teach the first area 1A comprising: a display area DA; and a peripheral area NDA surrounding the display area DA, and wherein the display element 300 overlaps the display area DA (Figures 1 and 6-7, pages 10-34). In regard to claim 8, Jeong et al. teach a display device comprising: a substrate 100; a display element 300 on the substrate 100; an organic insulating layer 260 spaced from the display element 300, arranged at an edge of the substrate 100 , wherein a face of the organic insulating layer 260 is coplanar with the edge of the substrate 100 (Figures 1 and 6-7, pages 10-34). In regard to claim 9, Jeong et al. teach a crack blocking unit 720/210 arranged on the peripheral area NDA and including a slit (areas between 720/210), wherein the organic insulating layer 260 covers at least one of the crack blocking unit 210 and the slit (area between 210) (Figures 1, 6-7 and 18, pages 10-34). In regard to claim 10, Jeong et al. teach a bending protection layer 600 overlapping a portion of the substrate 100 and partially overlapping the organic insulating layer 260, wherein the organic insulating layer 260 is positioned between the bending protection layer 600 and the bent area BA (Figures 1 and 6-7, pages 10-34). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 11-20 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: In regard to claim 11, The prior art of record (Jeong et al. (EP 3460622 A2)) does not disclose, make obvious, or otherwise suggest the structure of the applicant's claimed invention together with the other limitations of the dependent claims 12-20, such as the configuration of the substrate, first through fifth sides, curved section, display element, edge protection unit, organic insulating layer and straight section. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The following patents are cited to further show the state of the art with respect to display devices: Kim et al. (US 2020/0388784 A1) Maruyama et al. (WO 2019082847 A1) Ohara (US 2020/0203467 A1) Park et al. (CN 109326625 A). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to IDA M SOWARD whose telephone number is (571)272-1845. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Thursday, 7am to 5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Leonard Chang can be reached at 571-270-3691. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. IMS May 26, 2026 /IDA M SOWARD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684801
VERTICAL FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTOR INCLUDING CHANNEL HAVING GaN AND AIGaN REGIONS
4y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684998
DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684961
Organic Light Emitting Display Device and Method for Manufacturing the Same
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684891
THREE-TERMINAL INTERDIGITATED BACK CONTACT PHOTOELECTRIC DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677666
DIE EDGE PROTECTION TO ELIMINATE DIE CHIPPING
4y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+5.5%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1351 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month