Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/633,966

CAPTURING AND AMPLIFYING POLYNUCLEOTIDES

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Apr 12, 2024
Priority
Apr 14, 2023 — provisional 63/496,351
Examiner
CHUNDURU, SURYAPRABHA
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Illumina Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
71%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allowance Rate
388 granted / 728 resolved
-6.7% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
783
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
§103
31.6%
-8.4% vs TC avg
§102
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
§112
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 728 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. DETAILED ACTION 1. Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I in the reply filed on July 20, 2026 is acknowledged. Status of Application 2. Claims 1-5, 7, 9-12, 14-18 and 20-26 are considered for examination. Claim 27 has been withdrawn from further consideration as being drawn to nonelected group. Claims 6, 8, 13, 19 and 28-138 were canceled. Priority 3. This application filed on April 12, 2024 claims priority benefit to US 63/496,351 filed on April 14, 2023. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 4. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 18 and 20-22 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 18 recites the limitation "the first polynucleotide" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim because the claim 17, 16 or 1 upon which the claim 18 depends do not have support for a first polynucleotide and it is unclear and indefinite what the limitation is referring to. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 5. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a) the invention was known or used by others in this country, or patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country, before the invention thereof by the applicant for a patent. Claims 1-5, 7, 9-12, 14-18 and 20-26 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Fisher et al. (US 2022/0090187). Fisher et al. teach a method of claim 1, amplifying a polynucleotide, the method comprising: contacting a structure (flow cell) with a fluid comprising polynucleotides having a variety of lengths, each of the polynucleotides comprising first and second adapters, wherein the structure comprises: a substrate comprising a first region and a second region spaced apart from one another by a gap of at least 100 nm; a first set of capture primers coupled to the first region of the substrate; and a second set of capture primers coupled to the second region of the substrate; hybridizing the first adapter of a polynucleotide from the fluid to a capture primer of the first set of capture primers; based upon that polynucleotide being sufficiently long to bridge the gap, amplifying that polynucleotide using the first set of capture primers and the second set of capture primers; and based upon that polynucleotide being insufficiently long to bridge the gap, not amplifying that polynucleotide (para 0120-0123, 0115, 0024-0036, 0054-0057, 0100, 0004-0021). With reference to claim 2, Fisher et al. teach that the gap has length A, and based upon the polynucleotide being about A/0.34 nm bases long or greater, the polynucleotide is amplified, and based upon the polynucleotide being less than about A/0.34 nm bases long, the polynucleotide is not amplified (para 0099-0100). With reference to claims 3-5, 7, 9-10, Fisher et al. teach that the structure further comprises a wall disposed within the gap between the first region and the second region, the first region is located within a first recess of the substrate, wherein the second region is located within a second recess of the substrate, and wherein the wall divides the first recess from the second recess; the structure further comprises a vertical sidewall comprising the first region or a raised surface comprising the first region; the first region surrounds the second region or wherein the second region surrounds the first region, the first region and the second region are at least partially coplanar with one another; the first region and the second region are at least partially vertically separated from one another (para 0071, 0115, 0014, 0023, 0099-0100). With reference to claims 11-17, Fisher et al. teach that the second set of capture primers comprises a mixture of first and second types of capture primers; the first set of capture primers consists essentially of a third type of capture primer; the first set of capture primers comprises amplification primers of a first type.; the second set of capture primers comprises amplification primers of a second type that is different from the first type; the first set of capture primers comprises seeding primers of a first type and the second set of capture primers comprises seeding primers of a second type that is different from the first type of the first seeding primers (para 0120-0124, 0024-0036, 0054-0057, 0095-0100). With reference to claim 18, Fisher et al. teach that the first adapter comprises a first seeding adapter which is shorter than the seeding primers of the first type, and the first polynucleotide comprises a second seeding adapter which is shorter than the seeding primers of the second type (para 0024-0036). With reference to claim 20, Fisher et al. teach that based upon that polynucleotide being sufficiently long to bridge the gap: the first seeding adapter and one of the seeding primers of the first type of the seeding primers form a first duplex, and the second seeding adapter and one of the seeding primers of the second type of the seeding primers form a second duplex, wherein the first and second duplex together sufficiently hold the polynucleotide to the structure to amplify the polynucleotide (para 0120-0123, 0024-0036, 0054-0057, 0100). With reference to claims 21, 23, Fisher et al. teach that based upon that polynucleotide being insufficiently long to bridge the gap: the first seeding adapter and one of the seeding primers of the first type of the seeding primers form a first duplex, or the second seeding adapter and one of the seeding primers of the second type of the seeding primers form a second duplex, wherein the first duplex alone insufficiently holds the polynucleotide to the structure to amplify the polynucleotide, and wherein the second duplex alone insufficiently holds the polynucleotide to the structure to amplify the polynucleotide and the structure further comprises amplification primers (para 0120-0123, 0024-0036, 0054-0057, 0095-0100). With reference to claim 22, Fisher et al. teach that the first duplex has a melting temperature of about 35-50 C; and the second duplex has a melting temperature of about 35-55 C (para 0099, 0115, 0033). With reference to claims 24-26, Fisher et al. teach that the first adapter is single-stranded; the polynucleotide further comprises a second adapter, which is double-stranded and a capture primer of the second set of capture primers binds to the second adapter using strand invasion (para 0095-0096, 0009, 0029, 0080-0081, 0064-0068, 0124). For all the above the claims are anticipated. Conclusion No claims are allowable. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SURYAPRABHA CHUNDURU whose telephone number is (571)272-0783. The examiner can normally be reached 8.00am-4.30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gary Benzion can be reached at 571-272-0782. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Suryaprabha Chunduru Primary Examiner Art Unit 1681 /SURYAPRABHA CHUNDURU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1681
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 12, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12735738
CIRCULAR PROBES AND METHODS FOR SAMPLE ANALYSIS
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12708886
METHOD OF GENERATING MONODISPERSE EMULSIONS
6y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12703879
RNASE H ASSISTED IN SITU ROLLING CIRCLE AMPLIFICATION
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12680131
METHODS AND REAGENTS FOR CHARACTERIZING GENOMIC EDITING, CLONAL EXPANSION, AND ASSOCIATED APPLICATIONS
5y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674195
METHODS AND KITS FOR HIGHLY MULTIPLEX SINGLE PRIMER EXTENSION
5y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
71%
With Interview (+17.8%)
3y 10m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 728 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month