Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/635,343

RECESS GATE AND INTERCONNECTOR STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR PREPARING THE SAME

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Apr 15, 2024
Priority
Feb 16, 2024 — divisional of 18/443,733
Examiner
YASMEEN, NISHATH
Art Unit
2811
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
NANYA TECHNOLOGY Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
368 granted / 477 resolved
+9.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
494
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
88.5%
+48.5% vs TC avg
§102
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
§112
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 477 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 4/1/2025, 8/7/2025 are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Note applicable to all claims being rejected in this Office action: Examiner notes that the limitations "overlap", "layer", "portion", “on”, “between” are being interpreted broadly in accordance with MPEP. Per MPEP 2111 and 2111.01, the claims are given their broadest reasonable interpretation and the words of the claims are given their plain meaning consistent with the specification without importing claim limitations from the specification. The claim presently discloses a structural limitation (i.e. overlap, layer, portion, contact) that is taught by prior art of record, therefore, the limitation is considered met by the prior art of record. Additionally, Merriam Webster dictionary defines the above limitations as “to occupy the same area in part”, “one thickness lying over or under another”, “an often limited part of a whole” “a function word to indicate position in close proximity with” “in the intervening space” respectively. Further note the limitation “contact” is being interpreted to include "direct contact" (no intermediate materials, elements or space disposed there between) and "indirect contact" (intermediate materials, elements or space disposed there between). Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang, Chih-Wei (US 2021/0407908 A1 hereinafter Huang) in view of Noh et al (US 2020/0381436 A1 hereinafter Noh). Regarding Claim 1, Huang discloses in Fig 2, 3A-3N: A method for fabricating a semiconductor device, comprising: forming an active region (aa) in a substrate (100) Fig 3A; forming a trench (RS) in the substrate, wherein the trench has side surfaces and a bottom surface Fig 3B [0036]; forming a recess gate structure (104) in the substrate, wherein the recess gate structure intersects the active region (See Fig 3B); forming at least one dielectric layer (110) on the substrate; forming a bit line contact (112/114: BC) in the at least one dielectric layer; forming a bit line (BL) over the bit line contact (BC) and in an additional dielectric layer (110c) Fig 3E; forming a contact structure (112/114) on the substrate, wherein the contact structure is located at a side of the recess gate structure (104), and is electrically connected to the active region (AA); sequentially forming a first conductive layer (108) and a second conductive layer (120) over the substrate, wherein the contact structure (112/114) is covered by the first and second conductive layers (See Fig 3G); forming a conductive pillar (CP) and a landing pad (116) over the substrate, wherein the conductive pillar overlaps and electrically connects to the contact structure, the landing pad covers and electrically connects to the conductive pillar, and a sidewall of the conductive pillar is laterally recessed from a sidewall of the landing pad (See Fig 3H, 3I); and forming a dielectric layer (110d) to laterally surround the conductive pillar and the landing pad (See Fig 3J); wherein the recess gate structure is formed by: oxidizing the side surfaces and the bottom surface the trench to conformally form a gate insulating layer (106), having a U-shaped configuration, in the trench at a position that the gate insulating layer is formed on side surfaces and a bottom surface of the trench (See Fig 3B) [0036]; wherein a top surface of the gate insulating layer (106), a top surface of the capping layer (108), and a top surface of the substrate (100) are coplanar with each other [0034-0044]. Huang does not disclose: forming a work function layer within the gate insulating layer and in the trench; forming a first conductive layer on the work function layer, within the gate insulating layer, and in the trench; and forming a capping layer on the first conductive layer and in the trench; However, Noh in a similar device teaches in Fig 6D-6H: forming a work function layer (124) on the gate insulating layer and in the trench; forming a first conductive layer (126) on the work function layer, within the gate insulating layer, and in the trench; and forming a capping layer (128) on the first conductive layer and in the trench; [0029-0034]. References Huang and Noh are analogous art because they both are directed to manufacturing methods of memory devices and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify method of Huang with the specified features of Noh because they are from the same field of endeavor. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing of the invention to combine teachings of Huang and Noh so that forming a work function layer within the gate insulating layer and in the trench; forming a first conductive layer on the work function layer, within the gate insulating layer, and in the trench; and forming a capping layer on the first conductive layer and in the trench as taught by Noh in Huang’s method since, this provides a novel technique for precisely controlling the threshold voltage of the gate electrode and enhancing the reliability of the integrated circuit device. Regarding Claim 2, Huang and Noh disclose: The method of claim 1, Huang discloses in Fig 2, 3A-3N: wherein the formation of the landing pad (116) is performed by a first etching process (Fig 3H, 3H) [0042]. Regarding Claim 3, Huang and Noh disclose: The method of claim 2, Huang discloses in Fig 2, 3A-3N: wherein the formation of the conductive pillar is performed by the first etching process and sequentially by a second etching process (Fig 3H, 3I) [0042]. Regarding Claim 4, Huang and Noh disclose: The method of claim 3, Huang discloses in Fig 2, 3A-3N: wherein the first etching process is an anisotropic etching process, and the second etching process is an isotropic etching process [0042, 0043] See Fig 3H, 3I. Regarding Claim 5, Huang and Noh disclose: The method of claim 1, Huang discloses in Fig 2, 3A-3N: further comprising: forming a capacitor plug (PG) disposed over and electrically connected to the landing pad (CP) [0047]. Regarding Claim 6, Huang and Noh disclose: The method of claim 5, Huang discloses in Fig 2, 3A-3N: further comprising: forming a storage capacitor (SC) disposed over and electrically connected to the capacitor plug (Fig 3N) [0048]. Claims 1, 7-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang, Chih-Wei (US 2021/0407908 A1 hereinafter Huang) in view of Lee et al (US 2017/0365608 A1 hereinafter Lee). Regarding Claim 1, Huang discloses in Fig 2, 3A-3N: A method for fabricating a semiconductor device, comprising: forming an active region (aa) in a substrate (100) Fig 3A; forming a trench (RS) in the substrate, wherein the trench has side surfaces and a bottom surface [0036]; forming a recess gate structure (104) in the substrate, wherein the recess gate structure intersects the active region (See Fig 3B); forming at least one dielectric layer (110) on the substrate; forming a bit line contact (112/114: BC) in the at least one dielectric layer; forming a bit line (BL) over the bit line contact (BC) and in an additional dielectric layer (110c) Fig 3E; forming a contact structure (112/114) on the substrate, wherein the contact structure is located at a side of the recess gate structure (104), and is electrically connected to the active region (AA); sequentially forming a first conductive layer (108) and a second conductive layer (120) over the substrate, wherein the contact structure (112/114) is covered by the first and second conductive layers (See Fig 3G); forming a conductive pillar (CP) and a landing pad (116) over the substrate, wherein the conductive pillar overlaps and electrically connects to the contact structure, the landing pad covers and electrically connects to the conductive pillar, and a sidewall of the conductive pillar is laterally recessed from a sidewall of the landing pad (See Fig 3H, 3I); and forming a dielectric layer (110d) to laterally surround the conductive pillar and the landing pad (See Fig 3J); wherein the recess gate structure is formed by: oxidizing the side surfaces and the bottom surface the trench to conformally form a gate insulating layer (106), having a U-shaped configuration, in the trench at a position that the gate insulating layer is formed on side surfaces and a bottom surface of the trench (See Fig 3B) [0036]; wherein a top surface of the gate insulating layer (106), a top surface of the capping layer (108), and a top surface of the substrate (100) are coplanar with each other [0034-0044]. Huang does not disclose: forming a work function layer within the gate insulating layer and in the trench; forming a first conductive layer on the work function layer within the gate insulating layer, and in the trench, and forming a capping layer on the first conductive layer and in the trench; However, Lee in a similar device teaches in Fig 10: forming a work function layer (146) on the gate insulating layer (120) and in the trench; forming a first conductive layer (144) on the work function layer within the gate insulating layer, and in the trench; and forming a capping layer (136) on the first conductive layer and in the trench; wherein the word function layer (146), the first conductive layer (144), and the capping layer (136) are surrounded by the gate insulating layer (120) [0102]. References Huang and Lee are analogous art because they both are directed to manufacturing methods of memory devices and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify method of Huang with the specified features of Lee because they are from the same field of endeavor. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing of the invention to combine teachings of Huang and Lee so that forming a work function layer within the gate insulating layer and in the trench; forming a first conductive layer on the work function layer, within the gate insulating layer, and in the trench; and forming a capping layer on the first conductive layer within the gate insulating layer and in the trench as taught by Lee in Huang’s method since, since, this provides a semiconductor device capable of reducing a leakage current of a transistor. Regarding Claim 7, Huang and Lee disclose: The method of claim 1. Huang does not disclose: wherein the recess gate structure further comprises: conformally disposing a liner layer on the first conductive layer and on the gate insulating layer, and disposed between the capping layer and the first conductive layer; and disposing a second conductive layer between the capping layer and the liner layer; wherein the liner layer is formed in a U-shaped cross-sectional profile for the second conductive layer disposing therein. However, Lee in a similar device teaches in Fig 10: wherein the recess gate structure further comprises: conformally disposing a liner layer (149_s) on the first conductive layer (144) and on the gate insulating layer (120), and disposed between the capping layer (136) and the first conductive layer (144); and disposing a second conductive layer (148) between the capping layer and the liner layer; wherein the liner layer (149_s) is formed in a U-shaped cross-sectional profile for the second conductive layer (148) disposing therein [0102]. References Huang and Lee are analogous art because they both are directed to manufacturing methods of memory devices and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify method of Huang with the specified features of Lee because they are from the same field of endeavor. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing of the invention to combine teachings of Huang and Lee so that the recess gate structure further comprises: conformally disposing a liner layer on the first conductive layer and on the gate insulating layer, and disposed between the capping layer and the first conductive layer; and disposing a second conductive layer between the capping layer and the liner layer; wherein the liner layer is formed in a U-shaped cross-sectional profile for the second conductive layer disposing therein as taught by Lee in Huang’s method since, this provides a semiconductor device capable of reducing a leakage current of a transistor. Regarding Claim 8, Huang and Lee disclose: The method of claim 7. Huang does not disclose: wherein a top surface of the liner layer is coplanar with a bottom surface of the capping layer. However, Lee in a similar device teaches in Fig 10: wherein a top surface of the liner layer (149_s) is coplanar with a bottom surface of the capping layer (136) [0102]. References Huang and Lee are analogous art because they both are directed to manufacturing methods of memory devices and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify method of Huang with the specified features of Lee because they are from the same field of endeavor. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing of the invention to combine teachings of Huang and Lee so that a top surface of the liner layer is coplanar with a bottom surface of the capping layer as taught by Lee in Huang’s method since, this provides a semiconductor device capable of reducing a leakage current of a transistor. Regarding Claim 9, Huang and Lee disclose: The method of claim 8. Huang does not disclose: wherein a top surface of the second conductive layer, the top surface of the liner layer, and the bottom surface of the capping layer are coplanar. However, Lee in a similar device teaches in Fig 10: wherein a top surface of the second conductive layer (148), the top surface of the liner layer (149_s), and the bottom surface of the capping layer (136) are coplanar [0102]. References Huang and Lee are analogous art because they both are directed to manufacturing methods of memory devices and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify method of Huang with the specified features of Lee because they are from the same field of endeavor. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing of the invention to combine teachings of Huang and Lee so that a top surface of the second conductive layer, the top surface of the liner layer, and the bottom surface of the capping layer are coplanar as taught by Lee in Huang’s method since, this provides a semiconductor device capable of reducing a leakage current of a transistor. Claim(s) 1, 7, 10-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chen, Te-Yin (US 2021/0408005 A1 hereinafter Chen) in view of Huang, Tse-Yao (US 2024/0222370 A1 hereinafter Huang70). Regarding Claim 1, Huang discloses in Fig 2, 3A-3N: A method for fabricating a semiconductor device, comprising: forming an active region (aa) in a substrate (100) Fig 3A; forming a trench (RS) in the substrate, wherein the trench has side surfaces and a bottom surface [0036]; forming a recess gate structure (104) in the substrate, wherein the recess gate structure intersects the active region (See Fig 3B); forming at least one dielectric layer (110) on the substrate; forming a bit line contact (112/114: BC) in the at least one dielectric layer; forming a bit line (BL) over the bit line contact (BC) and in an additional dielectric layer (110c) Fig 3E; forming a contact structure (112/114) on the substrate, wherein the contact structure is located at a side of the recess gate structure (104), and is electrically connected to the active region (AA); sequentially forming a first conductive layer (108) and a second conductive layer (120) over the substrate, wherein the contact structure (112/114) is covered by the first and second conductive layers (See Fig 3G); forming a conductive pillar (CP) and a landing pad (116) over the substrate, wherein the conductive pillar overlaps and electrically connects to the contact structure, the landing pad covers and electrically connects to the conductive pillar, and a sidewall of the conductive pillar is laterally recessed from a sidewall of the landing pad (See Fig 3H, 3I); and forming a dielectric layer (110d) to laterally surround the conductive pillar and the landing pad (See Fig 3J); wherein the recess gate structure is formed by: oxidizing the side surfaces and the bottom surface the trench to conformally form a gate insulating layer (106), having a U-shaped configuration, in the trench at a position that the gate insulating layer is formed on side surfaces and a bottom surface of the trench (See Fig 3B) [0036]; wherein a top surface of the gate insulating layer (106), a top surface of the capping layer (108), and a top surface of the substrate (100) are coplanar with each other [0034-0044]. Huang does not disclose: forming a work function layer within the gate insulating layer and in the trench; forming a first conductive layer on the work function layer, within the gate insulating layer, and in the trench; and forming a capping layer on the first conductive layer and in the trench; However, Huang70 in a similar device teaches in Fig 1-16: forming a work function layer (313) on the gate insulating layer (311) and in the trench; forming a first conductive layer (317) on the work function layer within the gate insulating layer and in the trench; and forming a capping layer (323) on the first conductive layer and in the trench [0087-0089]. References Huang and Huang70 are analogous art because they both are directed to manufacturing methods of memory devices and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify method of Huang with the specified features of Huang70 because they are from the same field of endeavor. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing of the invention to combine teachings of Huang and Huang70 so that forming a work function layer on the gate insulating layer and in the trench; forming a first conductive layer on the work function layer within the gate insulating layer and in the trench; and forming a capping layer on the first conductive layer and in the trench as taught by Huang70 in Huang’s method since, this provides a semiconductor device’s gate structure with a low resistance [0007]. Regarding Claim 7, Huang and Huang70 disclose: The method of claim 1. Huang does not disclose: wherein the recess gate structure further comprises: conformally disposing a liner layer on the first conductive layer and on the gate insulating layer, and disposed between the capping layer and the first conductive layer; and disposing a second conductive layer between the capping layer and the liner layer; wherein the liner layer is formed in a U-shaped cross-sectional profile for the second conductive layer disposing therein. However, Huang70 in a similar device teaches in Fig 10: wherein the recess gate structure further comprises: conformally disposing a liner layer (319) on the first conductive layer (317) and on the gate insulating layer (311), and disposed between the capping layer (323) and the first conductive layer (317); and disposing a second conductive layer (321) between the capping layer and the liner layer; wherein the liner layer (319) is formed in a U-shaped cross-sectional profile for the second conductive layer (321) disposing therein [0059]. References Huang and Huang70 are analogous art because they both are directed to manufacturing methods of memory devices and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify method of Huang with the specified features of Huang70 because they are from the same field of endeavor. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing of the invention to combine teachings of Huang and Huang70 so that the recess gate structure further comprises: conformally disposing a liner layer on the first conductive layer and on the gate insulating layer, and disposed between the capping layer and the first conductive layer; and disposing a second conductive layer between the capping layer and the liner layer; wherein the liner layer is formed in a U-shaped cross-sectional profile for the second conductive layer disposing therein as taught by Huang70 in Huang’s method since, this provides a semiconductor device’s gate structure with a low resistance [0007]. Regarding Claim 10, Huang and Huang70 disclose: The method of claim 7. Huang does not disclose: wherein the liner layer is formed of a material having an etching selectivity to the gate insulating layer. However, Huang70 in a similar device teaches in Fig 10: wherein the liner layer (319) is formed of a material having an etching selectivity to the gate insulating layer (311) [0059]. References Huang and Huang70 are analogous art because they both are directed to manufacturing methods of memory devices and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify method of Huang with the specified features of Huang70 because they are from the same field of endeavor. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing of the invention to combine teachings of Huang and Huang70 so that the liner layer is formed of a material having an etching selectivity to the gate insulating layer as taught by Huang70 in Huang’s method since, this provides a semiconductor device’s gate structure with a low resistance [0007]. Regarding Claim 11, Huang and Huang70 disclose: The method of claim 10. Huang does not disclose: wherein the liner layer is formed of a material including sp² hybridized carbon atoms. However, Huang in a similar device teaches in Fig 10: wherein the liner layer (319) is formed of a material including sp² hybridized carbon atoms [0061]. References Huang and Huang70 are analogous art because they both are directed to manufacturing methods of memory devices and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify method of Huang with the specified features of Huang70 because they are from the same field of endeavor. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing of the invention to combine teachings of Huang and Huang70 so wherein the liner layer is formed of a material including sp² hybridized carbon atoms as taught by Huang70 in Huang’s method since, this provides a semiconductor device’s gate structure with a low resistance [0007]. Regarding Claim 12, Huang and Huang70 disclose: The method of claim 7. Huang does not disclose: wherein the second conductive layer is formed of molybdenum. However, Huang70 in a similar device teaches in Fig 10: wherein the second conductive layer (321) is formed of molybdenum [0066]. References Huang and Huang70 are analogous art because they both are directed to manufacturing methods of memory devices and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify method of Huang with the specified features of Huang70 because they are from the same field of endeavor. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing of the invention to combine teachings of Huang and Huang70 so the second conductive layer is formed of molybdenum as taught by Huang70 in Huang’s method since, this provides a semiconductor device’s gate structure with a low resistance [0007]. Regarding Claim 13, Huang and Huang70 disclose: The method of claim 12. Huang does not disclose: wherein the second conductive layer is formed by a chemical vapor deposition process. However, Huang70 in a similar device teaches in Fig 10: wherein the second conductive layer (321) is formed by a chemical vapor deposition process [0066]. References Huang and Huang70 are analogous art because they both are directed to manufacturing methods of memory devices and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify method of Huang with the specified features of Huang70 because they are from the same field of endeavor. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing of the invention to combine teachings of Huang and Huang70 so that the second conductive layer is formed by a chemical vapor deposition process as taught by Huang in Huang70’s method since, this provides a semiconductor device’s gate structure with a low resistance [0007]. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-6 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NISHATH YASMEEN whose telephone number is (571)270-7564. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9AM-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lynne Gurley can be reached at 571-272-1670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NISHATH YASMEEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2811
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 15, 2024
Application Filed
May 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jun 09, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677689
AI WIRING MATERIAL
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672471
DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672589
PANEL STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666574
MULTILAYER BACK PLATE WITH MOLDED CERAMIC LAYER
4y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666800
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+9.1%)
2y 6m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 477 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month