Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/636,252

MOTOR DRIVING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 15, 2024
Priority
Jul 07, 2023 — TW 112125576
Examiner
IMTIAZ, ZOHEB S
Art Unit
2846
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Aph Epower Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
376 granted / 468 resolved
+12.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
491
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
80.0%
+40.0% vs TC avg
§102
12.7%
-27.3% vs TC avg
§112
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 468 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Saha et al. US publication no.: US 2018/0287510 A1. In view of in view of Rozman et al. US publication no.: US 2019/0031125 A1 Regarding claim 1, Saha et al. teach, A motor driving device for driving a motor (motor 80, figure 1) , comprising: a battery module (power supply 11, figures 1-2) configured to store battery power; and a conversion circuit (inverter 10, figure 1) coupled to the motor and the battery module and configured to drive the motor by using the battery power in a driving mode and charge the battery module by using motor power generated by the motor in a charging mode (see paragraph 18, where the charging of the DC power supply via inverter is disclosed) , wherein the conversion circuit comprises: a determination circuit (see paragraphs 48-50 and figure 6); a controller (controller 20, figures 1-2) coupled to the determination circuit; and a first phase upper arm switch circuit, comprising: a first power switch (see upper switching element 5(3), figure 2) , wherein a first terminal of the first power switch is coupled to a positive power supply terminal of the battery module (see figure 1, where the top terminal is connected to positive supply of power supple 11), a second terminal of the first power switch is coupled to a first phase node, and a control terminal (S1, figure 2) of the first power switch is coupled to the controller; and a first transistor (upper switching element 7(3), figure 2) , wherein a first terminal of the first transistor is coupled to the positive power supply terminal, a second terminal of the first transistor is coupled to the first phase node, and a control terminal of the first transistor is coupled to the controller (see figures 1-2 for the connection of switching element to the control, node, positive supply terminal and the phase node), Saha et al. teach controlling of the switches as seen in figures 3 and 6 and paragraphs 41-50, where the switching control is described based on the voltage condition. Furthermore, Saha et al. teach that the inverter is utilized in charging the battery as seen in paragraph 18. However, Saha et al. is silent on specifically teaching: wherein in the charging mode, the controller turns off the first power switch and the first transistor, the determination circuit determines a first phase voltage value located at the first phase node, and when the first phase voltage value is greater than a battery voltage value located at the positive power supply terminal, the determination circuit notifies the controller to turn on the first transistor. However, Rozman et al. is in the same field of art and teach: wherein in the charging mode, the controller turns off the first power switch and the first transistor, the determination circuit determines a first phase voltage value located at the first phase node (see paragraph 28, where the phase voltage is detected above threshold), and when the first phase voltage value is greater than a battery voltage value located at the positive power supply terminal, the determination circuit notifies the controller to turn on the first transistor (see paragraphs 21-30, where the buck/boost operation is disclosed in which switches are controlled based on the voltage determined in order to charge the battery). Examiner notes* - Rozman et al. is brought in to teach that a voltage is compared to a threshold in order to initiate the charging of the battery and would be applied to the structure of Saha et al. In view of Rozman et al.’s teachings, it would’ve been obvious to one with the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, with the apparatus as taught by Saha et al. to include; wherein in the charging mode, the controller turns off the first power switch and the first transistor, the determination circuit determines a first phase voltage value located at the first phase node, and when the first phase voltage value is greater than a battery voltage value located at the positive power supply terminal, the determination circuit notifies the controller to turn on the first transistor, for the purpose of improving the control of the drive system. Regarding claim 2, Saha et al. teach, the motor driving device according to claim 1, wherein the conversion circuit further comprises: a first phase lower arm switch circuit, comprising: a second power switch (see lower switching element 5(3), figure 2) , wherein a first terminal of the second power switch is coupled to the first phase node, a second terminal of the second power switch is coupled to a negative power supply terminal of the battery module, and a control terminal of the second power switch is coupled to the controller (see figures 1-2 for the connection of switching element to the control, node, positive supply terminal and the phase node) ; and a second transistor (see lower switching element 7(3), figure 2) , wherein a first terminal of the second transistor is coupled to the first phase node, a second terminal of the second transistor is coupled to the negative power supply terminal, and a control terminal of the second transistor is coupled to the controller(see figures 1-2 for the connection of switching element to the control, node, positive supply terminal and the phase node). Regarding claim 3, Rozman et al. teach, the motor driving device according to claim 2, wherein in the charging mode, the controller turns off the second power switch and the second transistor, and when the first phase voltage value is less than a reference low voltage value, the determination circuit notifies the controller to turn on the second transistor (see paragraphs 21-30). Regarding claim 4, Saha et al. teach, the motor driving device according to claim 3, wherein in the charging mode, the determination circuit determines a first phase current flowing through the first phase node, and when the first phase current flows to the positive power supply terminal through a diode of the first power switch, the determination circuit notifies the controller to turn on the first transistor (see paragraphs 43-45 and paragraph 56 and figure 4 and 8). Regarding claim 5, Saha et al. teach, the motor driving device according to claim 4, wherein in the charging mode, when the first phase current flows to the first phase node through a diode of the second power switch, the determination circuit notifies the controller to turn on the second transistor (see paragraphs 43-45 and paragraph 56 and figure 4 and 8). Regarding claim 6, Saha et al. teach, the motor driving device according to claim 3, wherein in the charging mode, when the first transistor is turned on, the determination circuit determines a first phase current flowing through the first phase node, and when the first phase current flows from the positive power supply terminal to the first phase node, the determination circuit notifies the controller to turn off the first transistor (see figures 6 and 8 and paragraphs 48-56). Regarding claim 7, Saha et al. teach, the motor driving device according to claim 6, wherein in the charging mode, when the second transistor is turned on, the determination circuit determines the first phase current, and when the first phase current flows from the first phase node to the negative power supply terminal, the determination circuit notifies the controller to turn off the second transistor(see figures 6 and 8 and paragraphs 48-56). Regarding claim 8, Saha et al. teach, the motor driving device according to claim 3, wherein in the charging mode, when the first transistor is turned on, the determination circuit determines the first phase voltage value, and when the first phase voltage value is greater than the battery voltage value, the determination circuit notifies the controller to turn off the first transistor based on a first turning-on time length and determines the first phase voltage value when the first transistor is turned off (see figures 6 and 8, where the control of how long the switching elements are turned off/on are based on the time lengths). Regarding claim 9, Saha et al. teach, the motor driving device according to claim 3, wherein in the charging mode, when the second transistor is turned on, the determination circuit determines the first phase voltage value, and when the first phase voltage value is equal to the reference low voltage value, the determination circuit notifies the controller to turn off the second transistor based on a second turning-on time length and determines the first phase voltage value when the second transistor is turned off (see figures 6 and 8, where the control of how long the switching elements are turned off/on are based on the time lengths). Claim 16 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Saha et al. US publication no.: US 2018/0287510 A1. In view of Rozman et al. US publication no.: US 2019/0031125 A1 and further in view of Jones et al. US publication no.: US 2025/0135959 A1. Regarding claim 16, Saha et al. as modified is silent on specifically teaching: The motor driving device according to claim 1, wherein the battery module is implemented by an aluminum-ion battery. However, Jones et al. is in the same field of art and teach: wherein the battery module is implemented by an aluminum-ion battery (see paragraph 62). In view of Jones et al. ’s teachings, it would’ve been obvious to one with the ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, with the apparatus as taught by Saha et al. to include; wherein the battery module is implemented by an aluminum-ion battery, for the purpose of providing a variant battery source. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZOHEB S IMTIAZ whose telephone number is (571)272-4308. The examiner can normally be reached 11am-730pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Colon Santana can be reached at 571-272-2060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZOHEB S IMTIAZ/Primary Examiner , Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 15, 2024
Application Filed
May 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640670
FEEDFORWARD CURRENT CONTROL OF INDUCTION MACHINES
2y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12627220
POWER CONVERTER AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A POWER CONVERTER
2y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12620920
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SHIFTING OPERATION MODES OF VARIABLE FLUX MEMORY MOTORS
2y 6m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12620919
MOTOR DRIVER FOR STARTING UP MOTOR HAVING ANY RESISTANCE
1y 10m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12615002
MOTOR DRIVEN APPLIANCE AND PROTECTION METHOD THEREOF
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+14.4%)
2y 5m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 468 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month