Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026

Aph Epower Co. Ltd.

11 pending office actions • 10 art units • 11 examiners • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
7
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (45%)
6
Medium (55%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (27%)
§103 only5 (45%)
§102 only1 (9%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (18%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
45% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
18% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
36% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LY, XUAN 1 85.2% +6.5%
MOLNAR, HUNTER A 1 50.8% +32.6%
WALLICK, STEPHANIE SHOSHANA 1 29.7% +36.3%
SWEENEY, BRIAN P 1 93.5% +7.5%
BOROWSKI, MICHAEL 1 32.0% +61.5%
IMTIAZ, ZOHEB S 1 80.8% +14.0%
LUSTGRAAF, BENJAMIN T 1 57.6% +17.6%
YOON, KEVIN E 1 59.5% +43.1%
PARK, LISA S 1 77.3% +22.6%
CONLEY, OI K 1 69.6% +7.4%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18636252 MOTOR DRIVING DEVICE IMTIAZ, ZOHEB S 77d
19277341 POWER CONVERSION DEVICE LY, XUAN

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18644128 CARBON EMISSION CALCULATION SYSTEM AND CARBON EMISSION CALCULATION METHOD BOROWSKI, MICHAEL 43d overdue
18661677 HYBRID POWER SYSTEM SWEENEY, BRIAN P 23d overdue
19004431 CARBON EMISSION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND MANAGEMENT METHOD THEREOF MOLNAR, HUNTER A 33d
18979599 CARBON EMISSION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND MANAGEMENT METHOD THEREOF WALLICK, STEPHANIE SHOSHANA
18325123 NEGATIVE ELECTRODE STRUCTURE APPLIED TO ALUMINUM BATTERY CONLEY, OI K

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18644128 CARBON EMISSION CALCULATION SYSTEM AND CARBON EMISSION CALCULATION METHOD BOROWSKI, MICHAEL 43d overdue
18327070 NEGATIVE ELECTRODE STRUCTURE APPLIED TO ALUMINUM BATTERY LUSTGRAAF, BENJAMIN T 8d
19004431 CARBON EMISSION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND MANAGEMENT METHOD THEREOF MOLNAR, HUNTER A 33d
18636252 MOTOR DRIVING DEVICE IMTIAZ, ZOHEB S 77d
18979599 CARBON EMISSION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND MANAGEMENT METHOD THEREOF WALLICK, STEPHANIE SHOSHANA
18326009 NEGATIVE ELECTRODE STRUCTURE APPLIED TO ALUMINUM BATTERY YOON, KEVIN E
18326001 NEGATIVE ELECTRODE STRUCTURE OF ALUMINUM BATTERY PARK, LISA S

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3628 2
2836 1
3668 1
3624 1
2846 1
1727 1
1735 1
1729 1
1752 1
1725 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19277341 POWER CONVERSION DEVICE LY, XUAN 2836 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Jul 22, 2025
19004431 CARBON EMISSION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND MANAGEMENT METHOD THEREOF MOLNAR, HUNTER A 3628 §101§103 Final Rejection 33d Pending Dec 29, 2024
18979599 CARBON EMISSION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND MANAGEMENT METHOD THEREOF WALLICK, STEPHANIE SHOSHANA 3628 §101§103 Final Rejection Pending Dec 13, 2024
18661677 HYBRID POWER SYSTEM SWEENEY, BRIAN P 3668 §103§112 Final Rejection 23d overdue Pending May 12, 2024
18644128 CARBON EMISSION CALCULATION SYSTEM AND CARBON EMISSION CALCULATION METHOD BOROWSKI, MICHAEL 3624 §101§103 Final Rejection 43d overdue Pending Apr 24, 2024
18636252 MOTOR DRIVING DEVICE IMTIAZ, ZOHEB S 2846 §103 Non-Final OA 77d Pending Apr 15, 2024
18327070 NEGATIVE ELECTRODE STRUCTURE APPLIED TO ALUMINUM BATTERY LUSTGRAAF, BENJAMIN T 1727 §102 Final Rejection 8d Pending Jun 01, 2023
18326009 NEGATIVE ELECTRODE STRUCTURE APPLIED TO ALUMINUM BATTERY YOON, KEVIN E 1735 §103 Final Rejection Pending May 31, 2023
18326001 NEGATIVE ELECTRODE STRUCTURE OF ALUMINUM BATTERY PARK, LISA S 1729 §103 Final Rejection Pending May 31, 2023
18325123 NEGATIVE ELECTRODE STRUCTURE APPLIED TO ALUMINUM BATTERY CONLEY, OI K 1752 §102§103 Non-Final OA Pending May 30, 2023
17978985 ENERGY STORAGE DEVICE MADE OF ALLUMINUM ELECTRODE MERKLING, MATTHEW J 1725 §103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Nov 02, 2022

Managing Aph Epower Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month