Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/636,337

TOOLLESS COMPRESSION ATTACHED MEMORY MODULE INSTALLATION IN INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEMS

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Apr 16, 2024
Priority
Jul 15, 2021 — continuation of 11/978,971
Examiner
DINH, TUAN T
Art Unit
2848
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Dell Products L.P.
OA Round
2 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
944 granted / 1198 resolved
+10.8% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1229
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
45.0%
+5.0% vs TC avg
§102
38.5%
-1.5% vs TC avg
§112
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1198 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 18 is objected to because of the following informalities: Regarding claim 18, line 5, please, change “sliding IHS component” to - - sliding the IHS component - - for proper reading. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 6-10, 12-16, and 18-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a(1) as being anticipated by Cromwell et al. (U.S. Patent 6,930,884), hereafter Cromwell. As to claim 1, Cromwell discloses a bolster plate (80) as shown in figures 1-2, comprising: a body (86) configured to contact a memory module (the processor 20 can act as memory device or module with high-speed storage component like registers and cache memory) at a contact surface (top surface) of the body (86); and a ramped hole (82), the ramped hole (82) having a hole axis normal to the contact surface configured to (adapted to or capable of being) convert lateral displacement in a direction parallel to the contact surface into vertical displacement a direction parallel to the hole axis in response to the ramped hole (82) sliding in the direction parallel to the contact surface along a standoff (60) coupled to a Printed Circuit Board (PCB-30) to provide compression between terminals (not shown but the bottom side of the chip 20 connected to the socket 52) of the memory module (20) and a connector (socket 52) on the PCB (30). As to claim 2, Cromwell discloses the bolster plate (80) is configured to lock in place, upon the lateral displacement, to maintain the compression. As to claim 6, Cromwell discloses a head of the standoff (60) is angled at a chamfer (at the element 62) matching a chamfer (at the narrow hole) in the ramped hole (82). As to claim 7, Cromwell discloses the ramped hole (82) is configured to: receive the head (61) of the standoff (60) through a first end; and increase the compression in response to movement of the head along the chamfer towards a second end opposite the first end. As to claim 8, Cromwell discloses the second end (the narrow hole) is configured to lock the bolster plate (80) in place to maintain the compression. As to claim 9, Cromwell discloses the ramped hole (82) comprises: a deep end configured to receive a head (61) of the standoff (60); and a ramp between the deep end and a shallow end, wherein the ramp comprises a slot (85) configured to receive a shaft (the neck) of the standoff. As to claim 10, Cromwell discloses in figures 1-2 the shallow end is angled obliquely away from the ramp to receive the head (61), lock the bolster plate (80) in place, and maintain the compression. As to claim 12, Cromwell discloses an Information Handling System (IHS), as shown in figures 1-2 comprising: a Printed Circuit Board (PCB-30) comprising a connector (socket 52) and a standoff (60); a memory module (the processor 20 can act as memory device or module with high speed storage component like registers and cache memory), a plate (86) contacting the memory module at a contact surface of the plate, the plate comprising a ramped hole (82) having a hole axis normal to the contact surface, wherein the ramped hole configured to: receive the standoff (60), and (ii) translate lateral displacement a direction parallel to the contact surface into vertical displacement a direction parallel to the hole axis in response to the standoff (60) sliding a direction parallel to the contact surface along the ramped hole (82) to provide a compression force between terminals of the memory module (20) and the connector (52). As to claim 13, Cromwell discloses a head of the standoff (60) is angled at a chamfer (at the element 62) matching a chamfer (at the narrow hole) in the ramped hole (82). As best understood to claim 14, Cromwell discloses the ramped hole (82) is configured to: receive the head (61) of the standoff (60) through a first end; and increase the compression in response to movement of the head along the chamfer towards a second end opposite the first end. As to claim 15, Cromwell discloses the ramped hole (82) comprises: a deep end configured to receive a head (61) of the standoff (60); and a ramp between the deep end and a shallow end, wherein the ramp comprises a slot (85) configured to receive a shaft (the neck) of the standoff. As to claim 16, Cromwell discloses in figures 1-2 the shallow end is angled obliquely away from the ramp. As best understood to claim 18, Cromwell discloses a method for toolless installation of a memory module in an information handing system (IHS), comprising: receiving, via a ramped hole (82) in an Information Handling System (IHS) component (80), a head (61) of a standoff (60) coupled to a Printed Circuit Board (PCB- 30); and sliding the IHS component (80) perpendicularly to a shaft (a neck) of the standoff (60) in a first direction to cause a contact surface of the HIS component that is in contact with the memory module to compress electrical terminals of the memory module (20) against a connector (a socket 52) on the PCB (30); wherein the first direction is parallel to the contact surface of the HIS component. As to claim 19, Cromwell further comprising sliding the IHS component (80 or the body 86) perpendicularly to the shaft (the neck of the standoff 60) in a second direction opposite the first direction to decompress the electrical terminals memory module from the connector (52). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3-5, 11, 17, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cromwell in view of Peterson et al. (U.S. 2019/0252286). Regarding claim 3, Cromwell discloses all of the limitations of claimed invention except for a flange extending generally perpendicular from the body. Peterson teaches a segmented heatsink (106f) as shown in figure 5B that comprises a flange (the left and right ends of the body 120e-120f of the plate 106f) extending generally perpendicular from the body. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date to have a teaching of Peterson employed in the HIS and its method of Cromwell in order to provide excellent protection and heat dissipation structure. Regarding claim 4, Cromwell as modified by Peterson teaches the flange is positioned to be disposed over an end edge of another PCB (126-figure 5B) comprising the memory module (104). Regarding claim 5, Cromwell as modified by Peterson, Cromwell further comprising a dielectric insulating material (TIM or thermos interface material 53) disposed on a bottom surface of the body (plate 86) to contact the other PCB (30), the dielectric insulating material (53) having a low coefficient of friction. Regarding claims 11, 17, and 20, Cromwell discloses all of the limitations of claimed invention except for the memory module comprises a Compression Attached Memory Module (CAMM). Peterson teaches electronic devices (102a-102c) as shown in figures 1 and 5A- 5B comprising a circuit board (a substrate 126, para-0048) having a Compression Attached Memory Module (CAMM, 104p-104s) mounted on. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date to have a teaching of Peterson employed in the HIS and its method of Cromwell in order to improve signal integrity and faster memory speeds. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Applicant's arguments filed 06/17/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues: Cromwell does not disclose or teach “in response to the ramped hole sliding in the direction parallel to the contact surface provide compression between terminals of the memory module and a connector on the PCB" as is recited in amended claims 1, 12, and 18. After carefully review, examiner respectively disagrees. As shown in figures 1-2 of Cromwell, the load stud or standoff (60) inserted into wide opening (94) of the ramped hole (82) having a hole axis normal (vertical or perpendicular) to the contact surface (the top surface) configured to (adapted to or capable of being) convert lateral displacement in a direction parallel to the contact surface into vertical displacement a direction parallel to the hole axis in response to the ramped hole (82) sliding in the direction parallel to the contact surface along a standoff (60), Cromwell teaches in figure 2 that the standoff (60) after inserted into the wide opening or hole (94) and slide and lock into the narrow hole/opening (not label) to provide compression between terminals (not shown but the bottom side of the chip 20 connected to the socket 52) of the memory module (20) and a connector (socket 52) on the PCB (30). THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUAN T DINH whose telephone number is (571)272-1929. The examiner can normally be reached 8am-5pm, M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Dole can be reached at 571-272-2229. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TUAN T DINH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2847
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 16, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jun 17, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 28, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750955
EMBEDDED PACKAGE STRUCTURE, POWER SUPPLY APPARATUS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740147
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733099
ELECTRONICS PACKAGING FOR MOVING PLATFORMS
4y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12733100
REDUCING PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD AREA FOR SINGLE-SIDED PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727086
FLEXIBLE CIRCUIT BOARD AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THEREOF
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.1%)
2y 11m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1198 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month