Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/636,768

FLEXIBLE PRINTED CIRCUIT TO SUSPENSION SOLDERING IMPROVEMENT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 16, 2024
Examiner
TRAN, BINH BACH THANH
Art Unit
2847
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Western Digital Technologies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
545 granted / 680 resolved
+12.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
708
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
54.1%
+14.1% vs TC avg
§102
35.3%
-4.7% vs TC avg
§112
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 680 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1 - 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nakamiya (US 20220418078), in view of Liu (US 8325446). Regarding claim 1, Nakamiya discloses a hard disk drive flexible printed circuit (FPC 212, Fig. 2C and 2D) comprising: a plurality of fingers (the fingers 212a) extending from a root to a tip, each finger comprising: a first conductive trace layer (top wiring layer 252) positioned on a first side of a base layer (254) and comprising a particular plurality of electrical pads (pads 208d, 212d) extending to a lateral edge (Fig. 2B), and a second conductive trace layer (the second wiring layer 256) positioned on an opposing second side of the base layer and adhered with an adhesive layer (the adhesive layer between the layers; paragraph 25) to a cover film (the cover films 250, 258), Nakamiya does not explicitly disclose particular traces of the second conductive trace layer electrically connected to the particular plurality of electrical pads are routed so as to substantially not be underneath the particular plurality of electrical pads of the first conductive trace layer to inhibit heat transfer from the particular plurality of electrical pads to the second conductive trace layer. Liu suggests the traces (418, Fig. 4) from one layer are substantially not underneath the pads (440, 442, 444, 446). This structure arrangement is obviously limiting the heat transfer between pads and traces. It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to rearrange the position of the traces and pads in order to fit all the intended circuitry on the limited space of the circuit board and also to make sure the circuit board is function properly by limiting heat transfer and to protect the signal integrity. Regarding claim 2, Nakamiya, in view of Liu, discloses the claimed invention as set forth in claim 1. Nakamiya further suggests the particular plurality of electrical pads of the first conductive trace layer and the particular traces of the second conductive trace layer are positioned closest to the tip (pads are closest to the tip, the traces are connected to the pads, Fig. 2B). Regarding claim 3, Nakamiya, in view of Liu, discloses the claimed invention as set forth in claim 2. Nakamiya further suggests an average lateral width of a first pattern of the particular traces of the second conductive trace layer, in an area of the particular plurality of electrical pads of the first conductive trace layer, is in a range of 45%-55% narrower than an average lateral width of a second pattern of the traces of the second conductive trace layer in a direction toward the root (the wiring layer 352 having the distal end is narrower than the root end; fig. 3B). Regarding claim 4, Nakamiya, in view of Liu, discloses the claimed invention as set forth in claim 1. Nakamiya further suggests hard disk drive (HDD 100, Fig 1) comprising the FPC of claim 1. Regarding claim 5, Nakamiya discloses a hard disk drive (HDD 100, Fig. 1) flexible printed circuit (FPC 212, Fig. 2C & 2D) comprising: a plurality of fingers (the fingers 212a) extending from a root to a tip, each finger comprising: a first conductive trace layer (top wiring layer 252) positioned on a first side of a base layer (254) and comprising a particular plurality of electrical pads (pads 208d, 212d) extending to a lateral edge (Fig. 2B), and a second conductive trace layer (the second wiring layer 256) positioned on an opposing second side of the base layer and adhered with an adhesive layer (the adhesive layer between the layers; paragraph 25) to a cover film (the cover films 250, 258). Nakamiya does not explicitly disclose particular traces of the second conductive trace layer electrically connected to the particular plurality of electrical pads are configured such that the adhesive layer between the particular traces is wider than each particular trace to expose evaporative surface area of the adhesive layer. Liu suggests some particular traces (930, 932, 934) having large space in between. It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to customize the space between traces or components in order to fit all the intended circuitry on the limited space of the circuit board and also to make sure the circuit board is function properly by limiting heat transfer and to protect the signal integrity. Regarding claim 6, Nakamiya, in view of Liu, discloses the claimed invention as set forth in claim 5. Liu further suggests a width of each particular trace is substantially consistent throughout the second conductive trace layer (the width of the traces 818, Fig. 8, may remain consistent). Regarding claim 7, Nakamiya, in view of Liu, discloses the claimed invention as set forth in claim 6. Nakamiya further suggests the particular plurality of electrical pads of the first conductive trace layer and the particular traces of the second conductive trace layer are positioned closest to the tip (the pads and traces connected to the pad located near the tip; Fig. 2B). Regarding claim 8, Nakamiya, in view of Liu, discloses the claimed invention as set forth in claim 5. Nakamiya further discloses a hard disk drive (HDD 100, Fig. 1) comprising the FPC of claim 5. Regarding claim 9, Nakamiya discloses a method of manufacturing a flexible printed circuit (FPC 212, Fig. 2C & 2D) laminate composition having a plurality of fingers (the fingers 212a, Fig. 2C) extending from a root to a tip, the method comprising: forming a first conductive trace layer (top wiring layer 252) positioned on a first side of a base layer (254) and comprising a particular plurality of electrical pads (pads 208d, 212d) extending to a lateral edge (Fig. 2B); and forming a second conductive trace layer (the second wiring layer 256) positioned on an opposing second side of the base layer and adhered with an adhesive layer (the adhesive layer between the layers; paragraph 25) to a cover film (the cover films 250, 258). Nakamiya does not explicitly disclose configuring particular traces of the second conductive trace layer electrically connected to the particular plurality of electrical pads to inhibit bubbling of the adhesive layer in response to heating of the particular plurality of electrical pads. Nakamiya suggest heating the FPC uniformly to avoid generating excessive heat that may generate bubbles that may damage the FPC (paragraph 23). Liu suggests the traces are distributed substantially even throughout the surface of the circuit board, Fig. 4. That will help heating the board uniformly as suggested by Nakamiya. It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to rearrange the components and traces on the circuit board in order to fit all the intended circuitry on the limited space of the circuit board and also to make sure the circuit board is function properly by limiting heat transfer and to protect the signal integrity. Regarding claim 10, Nakamiya, in view of Liu, discloses the claimed invention as set forth in claim 9. Nakamiya does not explicitly disclose configuring the particular traces of the second conductive trace layer includes routing the particular traces so as to substantially not be underneath the particular plurality of electrical pads of the first conductive trace layer, to inhibit heat transfer from the particular plurality of electrical pads to the second conductive trace layer. Liu suggests the traces (418, Fig. 4) from one layer are substantially not underneath the pads (440, 442, 444, 446). This structure arrangement is obviously limiting the heat transfer between pads and traces. It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to rearrange the position of the traces and pads in order to fit all the intended circuitry on the limited space of the circuit board and also to make sure the circuit board is function properly by limiting heat transfer and to protect the signal integrity. Regarding claim 11, Nakamiya, in view of Liu, discloses the claimed invention as set forth in claim 10. Nakamiya further suggests forming the first and second conductive trace layers includes forming the particular plurality of electrical pads and the particular traces of the second conductive trace layer closest to the tip (pads and the traces connected to the pads are located near the tips, Fig. 2B). Regarding claim 12, Nakamiya, in view of Liu, discloses the claimed invention as set forth in claim 10. Nakamiya further suggests forming the second conductive trace layer includes forming a first pattern for the particular traces of the second conductive trace layer, in an area of the particular plurality of electrical pads of the first conductive trace layer, in a range of 45%-55% narrower than an average lateral width of a second pattern of for traces of the second conductive trace layer in a direction toward the root (the wiring layer 352 having the distal end is narrower than the root end; fig. 3B). Regarding claim 13, Nakamiya, in view of Liu, discloses the claimed invention as set forth in claim 9. Nakamiya does not explicitly disclose configuring the particular traces of the second conductive trace layer includes forming the particular traces such that the adhesive layer between the particular traces is wider than each particular trace, to expose evaporative surface area of the adhesive layer. Liu suggests some particular traces (930, 932, 934) having large space in between. It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to customize the space between traces or components in order to fit all the intended circuitry on the limited space of the circuit board and also to make sure the circuit board is function properly by limiting heat transfer and to protect the signal integrity. Regarding claim 14, Nakamiya, in view of Liu, discloses the claimed invention as set forth in claim 13. Liu further suggests a width of each particular trace is substantially consistent throughout the second conductive trace layer (the width of the traces 818, Fig. 8, may remain consistent). Regarding claim 15, Nakamiya, in view of Liu, discloses the claimed invention as set forth in claim 13. Nakamiya further suggests forming the first and second conductive trace layers includes forming the particular plurality of electrical pads and the particular traces of the second conductive trace layer closest to the tip (the pads and traces connected to the pad located near the tip; Fig. 2B). Regarding claim 16, Nakamiya discloses a hard disk drive (HDD 100, Fig. 1) comprising: a plurality of recording media (120) rotatably mounted on a spindle (the spindle 124, Fig. 1); a plurality of head sliders (head slider 110b) each housing a respective read-write transducer (110a) configured to read from and to write to at least one recording medium of the plurality of recording media; means for moving the plurality of head sliders (pivot shaft 148) to access portions of the recording media; and a flexible printed circuit (FPC 212) configured to transmit electrical signals to and from the plurality of head sliders, the FPC comprising a plurality of fingers extending from a root to a tip (Fig. 2C), each finger comprising: a first conductive trace layer (top wiring layer 252) positioned on a first side of a base layer (the base film 254) and comprising a particular plurality of electrical pads (208d, 212d) extending to a lateral edge (Fig. 2B), and a second conductive trace layer (the second wiring layer 256) positioned on an opposing second side of the base layer and adhered with an adhesive layer (the adhesive layer between the layers; paragraph 25) to a cover film (the cover films 250, 258). Nakamiya does not explicitly disclose means for inhibiting bubbling of the adhesive layer in response to heating of the particular plurality of electrical pads. Nakamiya suggest heating the FPC uniformly to avoid generating excessive heat that may generate bubbles that may damage the FPC (paragraph 23). Liu suggests the traces are distributed substantially even throughout the surface of the circuit board, Fig. 4. That will help heating the board uniformly as suggested by Nakamiya. It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to rearrange the components and traces on the circuit board in order to fit all the intended circuitry on the limited space of the circuit board and also to make sure the circuit board is function properly by limiting heat transfer and to protect the signal integrity. Regarding claim 17, Nakamiya, in view of Liu, discloses the claimed invention as set forth in claim 16. Nakamiya does not explicitly disclose the means for inhibiting includes particular traces of the second conductive trace layer electrically connected to the particular plurality of electrical pads positioned substantially not underneath the particular plurality of electrical pads of the first conductive trace layer to inhibit heat transfer from the particular plurality of electrical pads to the second conductive trace layer. Liu suggests the traces (418, Fig. 4) from one layer are substantially not underneath the pads (440, 442, 444, 446). This structure arrangement is obviously limiting the heat transfer between pads and traces. It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to rearrange the position of the traces and pads in order to fit all the intended circuitry on the limited space of the circuit board and also to make sure the circuit board is function properly by limiting heat transfer and to protect the signal integrity. Regarding claim 18, Nakamiya, in view of Liu, discloses the claimed invention as set forth in claim 17. Nakamiya further suggests an average lateral width of a first pattern of the particular traces of the second conductive trace layer, in an area of the particular plurality of electrical pads of the first conductive trace layer, is in a range of 45%-55% narrower than an average lateral width of a second pattern of the traces of the second conductive trace layer in a direction toward the root (the wiring layer 352 having the distal end is narrower than the root end; fig. 3B). Regarding claim 19, Nakamiya, in view of Liu, discloses the claimed invention as set forth in claim 16. Nakamiya does not explicitly discloses the means for inhibiting includes particular traces of the second conductive trace layer electrically connected to the particular plurality of electrical pads formed such that the adhesive layer between the particular traces is wider than each particular trace to expose evaporative surface area of the adhesive layer. Liu suggests some particular traces (930, 932, 934) having large space in between. It would have been obvious to one having skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to customize the space between traces or components in order to fit all the intended circuitry on the limited space of the circuit board and also to make sure the circuit board is function properly by limiting heat transfer and to protect the signal integrity. Regarding claim 20, Nakamiya, in view of Liu, discloses the claimed invention as set forth in claim 19. Liu further suggests a width of each particular trace is substantially consistent throughout the second conductive trace layer (the width of the traces 818, Fig. 8, may remain consistent). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Aoki (US 11074931) discloses a hard disk drive having many fingers, substrate, traces and pads, Fig. 5. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BINH B TRAN whose telephone number is (571)272-9289. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00 AM - 6:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy J Dole can be reached at 571-272-2229. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BINH B TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2848
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604393
ELECTRONIC CONTROL DEVICE AND GROUND LINE ROUTING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604401
FILM PACKAGE AND PACKAGE MODULE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601645
SELF-ADHESIVE STRAIN GAUGE ASSEMBLY INCLUDING FLEXIBLE PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604396
DEVICE PANEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601947
DISPLAY MODULE, DISPLAY DEVICE AND DRIVING CIRCUIT BOARD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+12.4%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 680 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month