Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/639,919

LASER EYE SURGERY SYSTEM CALIBRATION

Non-Final OA §101§102
Filed
Apr 18, 2024
Priority
Nov 02, 2012 — provisional 61/722,064 +2 more
Examiner
ROANE, AARON F
Art Unit
3792
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
AMO Development LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
660 granted / 899 resolved
+3.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
943
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
45.8%
+5.8% vs TC avg
§102
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
§112
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 899 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of group I, claims 1-12 (claim 18-29 were canceled by a preliminary amendment) in the reply filed on 07/29/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 13-17 have been withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 07/29/2026. The examiner will examine and search claims 1-12. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to an abstract idea without significantly more. The claim(s) recite(s) the 1) mapping step; 2) the generating step, and 3) the adjusting step all of which can be carried out with the human mind, a pen/pencil and a piece of paper. This judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application because there are no real-world steps, i.e., practical output steps evident from the claim. The claim(s) does/do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception because claim 1 only recites abstract steps (steps capable of being fully carried out with the human mind, a pen and a piece of paper). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of application for patent in the United States. Claim 1 is rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Chernyak (U.S. Patent 7,419,485). Regarding claim 1, Chernyak discloses a laser treatment comprising: mapping a plurality of laser beam focus locations comprising coordinate locations of a laser delivery system (see col. 8:55 through col. 9:23); generating a treatment table comprising a plurality of target locations of the eye (see col. 9:24 through col. 10:3); and adjusting the plurality of target locations of the eye based on the mapped plurality of laser beam focus locations so as to treat the eye at the plurality of target locations with the laser delivery system (see col. 2:33-50, col. 6:51 through col. 7:18). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AARON F ROANE whose telephone number is (571)272-4771. The examiner can normally be reached generally Mon-Fri 8am-9pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Niketa Patel can be reached at (571) 272-4156. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AARON F ROANE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3792
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 18, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12758334
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR SURGICAL TABLE STABILIZATION
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12758105
EAR SYSTEM
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12758359
ANALGESIC DEVICE
1y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12751781
TWO-TOOL ANATOMY STABILIZATION
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12751782
BILATERAL SURGICAL ROBOTIC SYSTEM
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+9.8%)
3y 9m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 899 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month