Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

AMO Development LLC

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

7 pending office actions • 3 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 20 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

AMO Development LLC has 7 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. The matters span 6 distinct examiners and 3 art units, showing broad examiner involvement within a smaller set of technical groups. This structure supports art-unit coordination, but it still requires examiner-specific response planning.

FARAH, AHMED M is the busiest examiner, with 2 pending matters. That examiner is the only identified point of repeated assignment in the profile, making those matters suitable for coordinated review. Counsel should still evaluate the remaining applications separately, while using the shared medical-device context to identify recurring claim construction or prior-art issues.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (14%)
3
Medium (43%)
3
Easy (43%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (14%)
§103 only2 (29%)
Double-patenting only3 (43%)
Double-patenting + other1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
14% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
86% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FARAH, AHMED M 2 78.9% +18.9%
YANG, WEI WEN 1 81.8% +11.7%
EISEMAN, LYNSEY C 1 49.1% +39.5%
ROANE, AARON F 1 73.4% +9.8%
KISH, JAMES M 1 62.4% +11.8%
FEDORKY, MEGAN TAYLOR 1 27.8% +40.4%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18923351 PUPIL DETECTION METHODS IN OPHTHALMIC LASER SURGERY FOR DETECTING PUPIL IN EYE IMAGES CAPTURED BEFORE AND AFTER EYE APPLANATION YANG, WEI WEN —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18639919 LASER EYE SURGERY SYSTEM CALIBRATION ROANE, AARON F —
17643812 CORNEAL LENTICULAR INCISION USING A FEMTOSECOND LASER WITH PERIODIC LASER BLANKING IN CENTRAL AREA OF LENTICULE FEDORKY, MEGAN TAYLOR —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18923351 PUPIL DETECTION METHODS IN OPHTHALMIC LASER SURGERY FOR DETECTING PUPIL IN EYE IMAGES CAPTURED BEFORE AND AFTER EYE APPLANATION YANG, WEI WEN —
18907307 PROCESS MONITORING AND CONTROL DURING LASER-BASED REFRACTIVE INDEX MODIFICATION OF INTRAOCULAR LENSES IN PATIENTS EISEMAN, LYNSEY C —
18900560 APPARATUS FOR PATTERNED PLASMA-MEDIATED LASER OPHTHALMIC SURGERY FARAH, AHMED M —
18607357 Method and Apparatus for Creating Ocular Surgical and Relaxing Incisions FARAH, AHMED M —
18545930 LASIK CORNEAL FLAP CUTTING PATTERNS FOR BUBBLE MANAGEMENT KISH, JAMES M —
17643812 CORNEAL LENTICULAR INCISION USING A FEMTOSECOND LASER WITH PERIODIC LASER BLANKING IN CENTRAL AREA OF LENTICULE FEDORKY, MEGAN TAYLOR —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3792 4
3796 2
2662 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18923351 PUPIL DETECTION METHODS IN OPHTHALMIC LASER SURGERY FOR DETECTING PUPIL IN EYE IMAGES CAPTURED BEFORE AND AFTER EYE APPLANATION YANG, WEI WEN 2662 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 22, 2024
18907307 PROCESS MONITORING AND CONTROL DURING LASER-BASED REFRACTIVE INDEX MODIFICATION OF INTRAOCULAR LENSES IN PATIENTS EISEMAN, LYNSEY C 3796 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 04, 2024
18900560 APPARATUS FOR PATTERNED PLASMA-MEDIATED LASER OPHTHALMIC SURGERY FARAH, AHMED M 3792 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 27, 2024
18639919 LASER EYE SURGERY SYSTEM CALIBRATION ROANE, AARON F 3792 §101§102 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 18, 2024
18607357 Method and Apparatus for Creating Ocular Surgical and Relaxing Incisions FARAH, AHMED M 3792 §112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 15, 2024
18545930 LASIK CORNEAL FLAP CUTTING PATTERNS FOR BUBBLE MANAGEMENT KISH, JAMES M 3792 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 19, 2023
17643812 CORNEAL LENTICULAR INCISION USING A FEMTOSECOND LASER WITH PERIODIC LASER BLANKING IN CENTRAL AREA OF LENTICULE FEDORKY, MEGAN TAYLOR 3796 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 10, 2021

Managing AMO Development LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does AMO Development LLC have?

AMO Development LLC has 7 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 6 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most AMO Development LLC applications?

Ahmed M Farah has the most, with 2 of AMO Development LLC's pending office actions.

What technology area are AMO Development LLC's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month