Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/640,938

MONITORING FUEL PHASE IN AIRCRAFT POWERPLANT FUEL SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Apr 19, 2024
Examiner
KIM, TAE JUN
Art Unit
3799
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Rtx Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
2-3
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
476 granted / 744 resolved
-6.0% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
788
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
85.9%
+45.9% vs TC avg
§102
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§112
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 744 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions REQUIREMENT FOR UNITY OF INVENTION As provided in 37 CFR 1.475(a), a national stage application shall relate to one invention only or to a group of inventions so linked as to form a single general inventive concept (“requirement of unity of invention”). Where a group of inventions is claimed in a national stage application, the requirement of unity of invention shall be fulfilled only when there is a technical relationship among those inventions involving one or more of the same or corresponding special technical features. The expression “special technical features” shall mean those technical features that define a contribution which each of the claimed inventions, considered as a whole, makes over the prior art. The determination whether a group of inventions is so linked as to form a single general inventive concept shall be made without regard to whether the inventions are claimed in separate claims or as alternatives within a single claim. See 37 CFR 1.475(e). When Claims Are Directed to Multiple Categories of Inventions: As provided in 37 CFR 1.475 (b), a national stage application containing claims to different categories of invention will be considered to have unity of invention if the claims are drawn only to one of the following combinations of categories: (1) A product and a process specially adapted for the manufacture of said product; or (2) A product and a process of use of said product; or (3) A product, a process specially adapted for the manufacture of the said product, and a use of the said product; or (4) A process and an apparatus or means specifically designed for carrying out the said process; or (5) A product, a process specially adapted for the manufacture of the said product, and an apparatus or means specifically designed for carrying out the said process. Otherwise, unity of invention might not be present. See 37 CFR 1.475 (c). This application contains claims directed to more than one species of the generic invention. These species are deemed to lack unity of invention because they are not so linked as to form a single general inventive concept under PCT Rule 13.1. The species are as follows: Ducted fan with outer and inner rows of chevrons – see Figs. 3A, 4 and 9. Unducted fan with single row of chevrons and variable pitch stator – see Figs. 3B, 5, 6, 7A-7F. Applicant is required, in reply to this action, to elect a single species to which the claims shall be restricted if no generic claim is finally held to be allowable. The reply must also identify the claims readable on the elected species, including any claims subsequently added. An argument that a claim is allowable or that all claims are generic is considered non-responsive unless accompanied by an election. Upon the allowance of a generic claim, applicant will be entitled to consideration of claims to additional species which are written in dependent form or otherwise require all the limitations of an allowed generic claim. Currently, the following claim(s) are generic: no claim appears generic as claim 1 is directed to a variable pitch stator disclosed only in the context of the unducted fan. The groups of inventions listed above do not relate to a single general inventive concept under PCT Rule 13.1 because, under PCT Rule 13.2, they lack the same or corresponding special technical features for the following reasons. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-4, 6, 8-9 and 13-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 last paragraph: “and operating the fuel system based on the phase parameter” is indefinite as it is unclear if this is using one or both of “phase parameter at the first monitoring location supplements the phase parameter at the second monitoring location” -- note these are not necessarily the same phase parameter at the different locations. See also claim 17, last paragraph for analogous issues. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4, 6, 8-9, 13, 16, 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Miller et al (2023/0366353) in view of Miller et al (2022/0403783) and Kunizawa et al (2022/0298745). Miller et al ‘353 [e.g. Fig. 3] teach An operating method for an aircraft powerplant, comprising: directing fuel in a first fuel circuit from a fuel source 210 towards a fuel injector 174 in a combustion section of the aircraft powerplant, wherein a fuel system 200 for the aircraft powerplant includes the fuel source, the first fuel circuit and the fuel injector, and the fuel system is configured to fluidly couple the fuel source to the fuel injector through the first fuel circuit; heating the fuel with a first fuel heater 221, wherein the first fuel heater is disposed downstream of the fuel source 210 along the first fuel circuit; and operating the fuel system based on the phase parameter, the fuel system operated in a first mode where the phase of the fuel being in a gaseous phase [223 off], and the fuel system operated in a second mode where the phase being in a liquid phase or a mixed phase with a first portion of the fuel in the liquid phase and a second portion of the fuel in the gaseous phase [223 on, see ¶ 0043 which teaches 223 is operated when 221 is insufficient to reach the desired temperature]. (2) wherein the fuel comprises hydrogen fuel. (3) wherein the fuel system further includes a second fuel heater 223; during the first mode, the fuel system directs the fuel from the first fuel circuit to the fuel injector; and during the second mode, the fuel system further heats the fuel using the second fuel heater 223 prior to directing the fuel from the first fuel circuit to the fuel injector 174 [¶ 0043]. (4) wherein the second fuel heater 223 is non-operational during the first mode [¶ 0043]. (6) wherein the second fuel heater 223 does not heat the fuel directed from the fuel source to the fuel injector during the first mode [¶ 0043]. (8) wherein the first fuel heater comprises a heat exchanger 221 which transfers heat energy from combustion products to be exhausted from the aircraft powerplant into the fuel [¶ 0032 teaches the heat exchanger may be in the turbine section or exhaust section for the waste heat source for e.g. 225]. (9) wherein the second fuel heater 223 is arranged downstream the first fuel heater along the first fuel circuit. (16) wherein the aircraft powerplant comprises a turbine engine. (17) An operating method for an aircraft powerplant, comprising: directing fuel in a liquid phase from a fuel source into a fuel delivery circuit 200, wherein a fuel system for the aircraft powerplant includes the fuel source 210, the fuel delivery circuit 200, a primary fuel heater 221, a secondary fuel heater 223 and a fuel injector 174, and wherein the fuel injector 174 is disposed in a combustion section of the aircraft powerplant; heating the fuel in the fuel delivery circuit using the primary fuel heater 221 to change the fuel into a gaseous phase or into a mixed phase with a first portion of the fuel in the liquid phase and a second portion of the fuel in the gaseous phase; and operating the fuel system based on the phase, the fuel system delivering the fuel to the fuel injector 174 when the phase of the fuel is in the gaseous phase, and the fuel system further heating the fuel with the secondary fuel heater 223 when the phase of the fuel is in the mixed phase such that the fuel in the mixed phase changes into the gaseous phase for subsequent delivery to the fuel injector 174. Miller et ‘353 specifically teach “[0043] The secondary vaporizer 223 of this embodiment is a combination start-up and trim vaporizer that may used to heat the liquid hydrogen fuel flowing through the fuel delivery assembly 202 when the main vaporizer 221 is not sufficient to heat the hydrogen fuel. During start-up of the engine 100, for example, the engine 100 may not be in a thermally stable condition, and the secondary vaporizer 223 is used during start-up (or prior to start-up) to heat the hydrogen fuel instead of the main vaporizer 221. In this example, the secondary vaporizer 223 operates as a start-up vaporizer. In another example, the main vaporizer 221 may not be heating the hydrogen fuel to the desired temperature and, thus, the secondary vaporizer 223 operates as a trim vaporizer to add supplemental heat to the hydrogen fuel and heat the hydrogen fuel to the desired temperature. Such a condition may occur when, for example, the heat provided by the primary heat source 225 to the main vaporizer 221 is not sufficient to heat the hydrogen fuel to the desired temperature.” In other words, Miller et al ‘353 already suggest the knowledge of the temperatures and phase parameter of the first / primary and second / secondary fuel heaters would be desirable so as to know when to determine when to turn on the second fuel heater 223 on and off for the supplementary heating. Miller et al ‘353 do not explicitly teach monitoring a phase parameter of the fuel within the first fuel circuit at a first monitoring location at the first fuel heater, and at a second monitoring location between the first fuel heater and the fuel injector, wherein the phase parameter at the first monitoring location supplements the phase parameter at the second monitoring location; and operating the fuel system based on the phase parameter, the fuel system operated in a first mode where the phase parameter is indicative of the fuel at the second monitoring location being in a gaseous phase, and the fuel system operated in a second mode where the phase parameter is indicative of the fuel at the second monitoring location being in a liquid phase or a mixed phase with a first portion of the fuel in the liquid phase and a second portion of the fuel in the gaseous phase at the second monitoring location; wherein the second fuel heater is arranged between the second monitoring location and the first fuel heater along the first fuel circuit; (13) continued monitoring of the phase parameter during the operating of the fuel system in the second mode; and switching from the second mode to the first mode once the phase parameter is indicative of the fuel at the second monitoring location being in the gaseous phase; (17) determining a phase parameter of the fuel within the fuel delivery circuit at a first monitoring location at the primary fuel heater, and at a second monitoring location downstream of the primary fuel heater, wherein the phase parameter at the first monitoring location supplements the phase parameter at the second monitoring location; and operating the fuel system based on the phase parameter, the fuel system delivering the fuel to the fuel injector when the phase parameter is indicative that the fuel at the second monitoring location is in the gaseous phase, and the fuel system further heating the fuel with the secondary fuel heater when the phase parameter is indicative that the fuel at the second monitoring location is in the mixed phase such that the fuel in the mixed phase changes into the gaseous phase for subsequent delivery to the fuel injector. Miller et al ‘783 teach monitoring a phase parameter of the fuel within the first fuel circuit at a first monitoring location [additional sensor 104, see ¶ 0040-0041], and at a second monitoring location 104 [between 90 and 100] between the first fuel heater [first of 98] and the fuel injector, wherein the phase parameter at the first monitoring location supplements the phase parameter at the second monitoring location 104 [between 90 and 100]; and operating the fuel system based on the phase parameter, the fuel system operated in a first mode where the phase parameter is indicative of the fuel at the second monitoring location 104 [between 90 and 100] being in a gaseous phase, and the fuel system operated in a second mode where the phase parameter is indicative of the fuel at the second monitoring location 104 [between 90 and 100] being in a liquid phase or a mixed phase with a first portion of the fuel in the liquid phase and a second portion of the fuel in the gaseous phase at the second monitoring location 104 [between 90 and 100]; wherein the second fuel heater [last of multiple heat exchangers 98] is arranged between the second monitoring location 104 [between 90 and 100] and the first fuel heater [first of multiple heat exchangers 98] along the first fuel circuit; (13) continued monitoring of the phase parameter during the operating of the fuel system in the second mode; and switching from the second mode to the first mode once the phase parameter is indicative of the fuel at the second monitoring location being in the gaseous phase [note fuel is desired to be gaseous for combustion, ¶ 0061]; (17) determining a phase parameter of the fuel within the fuel delivery circuit at a first monitoring location [additional sensor 104, see ¶ 0040-0041], and at a second monitoring location downstream of the primary fuel heater, wherein the phase parameter at the first monitoring location supplements the phase parameter at the second monitoring location 104 [between 90 and 100]; and operating the fuel system based on the phase parameter, the fuel system delivering the fuel to the fuel injector when the phase parameter is indicative that the fuel at the second monitoring location 104 [between 90 and 100] is in the gaseous phase, and the fuel system further heating the fuel with the secondary fuel heater when the phase parameter is indicative that the fuel at the second monitoring location is in the mixed phase such that the fuel in the mixed phase changes into the gaseous phase for subsequent delivery to the fuel injector. As Miller et al teach the second monitoring location is downstream of the thermal management system 90, which includes multiple (first, second or primary, secondary) heat exchangers, the monitoring location is analogous to that disclosed since the knowledge of the fuel phase / state at the second monitoring location, prior to fuel injection, allows the controller to utilize the sensed parameters, including the pressures and temperatures, determine the fuel state/phase ¶ 0068] and then control the heating of the heat exchangers 90, 98 to control the fuel state. Kunizawa et al teach [Fig. 3] monitoring a phase parameter of the fuel within the first fuel circuit at a first monitoring location 44B at the first fuel heater [vaporizer 39] and teaches the benefit of monitoring the phase parameter at the fuel heater 39 allows knowing if the fuel is vaporized from the first fuel heater. Kunizawa et al can also be regarded as broadly teaching the monitoring location is between each fuel heater 39 and the fuel injector 37 so that the outlet conditions of the vaporizer [gas vs liquid] are known, if multiple fuel heaters in series were used as is done in Miller et al ‘353. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to employ monitoring a phase parameter of the fuel within the first fuel circuit at a first monitoring location at the first fuel heater, and determining a phase parameter of the fuel within the fuel delivery circuit at a first monitoring location at the primary fuel heater, as taught by Kunizawa et al, in order to know the phase conditions at the outlet of the first heater to determine if sufficient vaporization / temperature was reached by the first fuel heater, which is consistent with the requirements of Miller et al ‘353. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to obvious to employ a second monitoring location between the first fuel heater and the fuel injector; and operating the fuel system based on the phase parameter, the fuel system operated in a first mode where the phase parameter is indicative of the fuel at the second monitoring location being in a gaseous phase, and the fuel system operated in a second mode where the phase parameter is indicative of the fuel at the second monitoring location being in a liquid phase or a mixed phase with a first portion of the fuel in the liquid phase and a second portion of the fuel in the gaseous phase at the second monitoring location, and determining a phase parameter of the fuel within the fuel delivery circuit at a second monitoring location downstream of the primary fuel heater, and operating the fuel system based on the phase parameter, the fuel system delivering the fuel to the fuel injector when the phase parameter is indicative that the fuel at the second monitoring location is in the gaseous phase, and the fuel system further heating the fuel with the secondary fuel heater when the phase parameter is indicative that the fuel at the second monitoring location is in the mixed phase such that the fuel in the mixed phase changes into the gaseous phase for subsequent delivery to the fuel injector, where Miller et al ‘783 teach using a phase sensor between the first fuel heater and the fuel injector for the second monitoring location, is the typical location used in the art so that the fuel phase / condition is known before combustion by the fuel injectors in order to facilitate controlling the fuel heaters based on the desired phase of the fuel prior to entering the fuel injector / combustor. It would have been obvious to employ wherein the phase parameter at the first monitoring location [of the first / primary fuel heater of Kunizawa et al - teach the phase parameter at the first monitoring location allows for knowledge of the flow at the exit of the vaporizer] to supplement the phase parameter at the second monitoring location, as taught by Miller ‘783, noting that the Miller ‘783 teaches using multiple sensors throughout the fuel flow path [including upstream the second fuel heater] to supplement the phase parameter at the second monitoring location to know the phase parameter at different locations within the fuel system and in order to know the phase conditions at the outlet of the first heater to determine if sufficient vaporization / temperature was reached by the first fuel heater, which is consistent with the requirements of Miller et al ‘353. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have the second fuel heater arranged between the second monitoring location and the first fuel heater along the first fuel circuit; (13) continued monitoring of the phase parameter during the operating of the fuel system in the second mode; and switching from the second mode to the first mode once the phase parameter is indicative of the fuel at the second monitoring location being in the gaseous phase, as taught by Miller et al ‘783, as the typical location used in the art of the second monitoring location so that the fuel phase / condition is gaseous before combustion by the fuel injectors consistent with the requirements of Miller et al ‘353 of when to turn on the second fuel heater to have sufficient vaporization / temperature for combustion. In combination, the prior art [abbreviated M ’353, M’783 and K] teach: (1) … heating the fuel with a first fuel heater [M ‘353], wherein the first fuel heater is disposed downstream of the fuel source along the first fuel circuit [M ‘353]; monitoring a phase parameter of the fuel within the first fuel circuit at a first monitoring location [added by K] at the first fuel heater, and at a second monitoring location [added by M ‘783] between the first fuel heater and the fuel injector [of M ‘353], wherein the phase parameter at the first monitoring location [from K] supplements the phase parameter at the second monitoring location [M ‘783]; and operating the fuel system based on the phase parameter, the fuel system operated in a first mode [M’353] where the phase parameter is indicative of the fuel at the second monitoring location being in a gaseous phase [M ‘783], and the fuel system operated in a second mode [M ‘353 teaches using the secondary fuel heater to achieve the desired temperature (of vaporization)] where the phase parameter is indicative of the fuel at the second monitoring location [M ‘783] being in a liquid phase or a mixed phase with a first portion of the fuel in the liquid phase and a second portion of the fuel in the gaseous phase at the second monitoring location [M ‘783]; (17) … determining a phase parameter of the fuel within the fuel delivery circuit at a first monitoring location [added by K] at the primary fuel heater [M ‘353], and at a second monitoring location [M ‘783] downstream of the primary fuel heater [M ‘353], wherein the phase parameter at the first monitoring location [added by K] supplements the phase parameter at the second monitoring location [M ‘783]; and operating the fuel system based on the phase parameter, the fuel system delivering the fuel to the fuel injector when the phase parameter is indicative that the fuel at the second monitoring location [M ‘783] is in the gaseous phase [M’353], and the fuel system further heating the fuel with the secondary fuel heater [M ‘353 teaches using the secondary fuel heater to achieve the desired temperature (of vaporization)] when the phase parameter is indicative that the fuel at the second monitoring location [M ‘783] is in the mixed phase such that the fuel in the mixed phase changes into the gaseous phase for subsequent delivery to the fuel injector. Claim(s) 14, 15, 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Miller et al (2023/0366353) in view of Miller et al (2022/0403783) and Kunizawa et al (2022/0298745), as applied above, and further in view of Dindar et al (11873768) and for claim 18 further in view of Muldoon et al (2022/0381185). Miller et al do not teach (14) wherein the fuel system further includes a gaseous fuel source; the fuel system fluidly decouples the gaseous fuel source from the fuel injector during the first mode; and the fuel system fluidly couples the gaseous fuel source to the fuel injector during the second mode; (15) directing a portion of the fuel in the gaseous phase from the first fuel circuit into the gaseous fuel source; nor (18) delivering gaseous fuel to the fuel injector from a gaseous fuel source at least while the secondary fuel heater is heating the fuel to change from the mixed phase to the gaseous phase. Dindar et al teach (14) wherein the fuel system further includes a gaseous fuel source 262 in additional to the liquid fuel source 252; the fuel system fluidly decouples 268 the gaseous fuel source from the fuel injector 272 during the first mode [if the amount of gaseous hydrogen produced by the vaporizer 260 is sufficient, then 258, 260 may provide all the vaporized fuel and 268 is decoupled]; and the fuel system fluidly couples 268 the gaseous fuel source 261 to the fuel injector during the second mode [gaseous fuel 261 is added during the second mode when vaporized gases from 260 is insufficient, see paragraph bridging cols. 14-15]; (15) directing a portion of the fuel in the gaseous phase 270, 261 from the first fuel circuit into the gaseous fuel source 262; and (18) delivering gaseous fuel to the fuel injector 272 from a gaseous fuel source 262 at least while the fuel heater 260 is heating the fuel to change from the liquid or mixed phase to the gaseous phase. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize (14) wherein the fuel system further includes a gaseous fuel source; the fuel system fluidly decouples the gaseous fuel source from the fuel injector during the first mode; and the fuel system fluidly couples the gaseous fuel source to the fuel injector during the second mode; (15) directing a portion of the fuel in the gaseous phase from the first fuel circuit into the gaseous fuel source, in the manner taught by Dindar et al, in order to provide gaseous fuel in the first mode which facilitates quicker startup at later times of operation, as this facilitates storing and utilizing the gaseous fuel when desired, including in the second mode. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to employ (18) delivering gaseous fuel to the fuel injector from a gaseous fuel source at least while the secondary fuel heater is heating the fuel to change from the mixed phase to the gaseous phase, as Dindar teaches delivering the gaseous fuel from the gaseous fuel source allows for ensuring sufficient gaseous fuel is delivered according to the desired amounts. As for delivering the gaseous fuel at least while the secondary fuel heater is heating the fuel to change from the mixed phase to the gaseous phase, this is further rendered obvious by Muldoon et al. Muldoon et al teach (18) delivering gaseous fuel 510 to the fuel injector from a gaseous fuel source 510 at least while the fuel heater is heating the fuel to change from the mixed phase to the gaseous phase during start-up [see ¶ 0048, 0063] -- note the fuel heater is heating the liquid fuel to gaseous phase during start-up while the gaseous hydrogen fuel is actually starting the main engine, and note that heating liquid to gaseous phase from an initially liquid phase, will inherently cover a two-phase condition, as both phases will be present at least during some time during such a heating condition and facilitates starting the engine with gaseous hydrogen during a multiplicity of conditions, including flame-out and/or providing redundancy with the main hydrogen starting system [¶ 0063]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to employ (18) delivering gaseous fuel to the fuel injector from a gaseous fuel source at least while the secondary fuel heater is heating the fuel to change from the mixed phase to the gaseous phase, as taught by Muldoon et al, as the gaseous fuel source is utilized during the start-up condition to enhance starting with hydrogen, including during flame-out conditions and/or to provide redundancy of starting by operating with an available source of gaseous hydrogen during startup. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 10/28/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant’s arguments focus on the new limitations added by amendment. These limitations have now been treated by the combination of Miller et al (2022/0403783) and Kunizawa et al (2022/0298745). Furthermore, the base reference has been switched to Miller et al (2023/0366353) which is highly analogous to McCurdy Gibson (2022/0145801). Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the Examiner should be directed to TED KIM whose telephone number is 571-272-4829. The Examiner can be reached on regular business hours before 5:00 pm, Monday to Thursday and every other Friday. The fax number for the organization where this application is assigned is 571-273-8300. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Devon Kramer, can be reached at 571-272-7118 Alternate inquiries to Technology Center 3700 can be made via 571-272-3700. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center. Should you have questions on Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). General inquiries can also be directed to the Inventors Assistance Center whose telephone number is 800-786-9199. Furthermore, a variety of online resources are available at https://www.uspto.gov/patent /Ted Kim/ Telephone 571-272-4829 Primary Examiner Fax 571-273-8300 January 8, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 19, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Oct 28, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 12, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Mar 12, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12624836
COMBUSTOR NOZZLE, COMBUSTOR, AND GAS TURBINE INCLUDING SAME
1y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12607157
ROLL CONTROL THRUSTER AND HYBRID ROCKET COMPRISING SAME
1y 6m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12595761
GENERATING ELECTRICAL ENERGY FROM HYDROGEN AND OXYGEN
2y 6m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12535032
AIRCRAFT NACELLE COMPRISING A SEALED BOX STRUCTURE AND A DOOR WHICH OPENS THE BOX STRUCTURE TO THE OUTSIDE
1y 6m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12510249
AUXILIARY POWER UNIT WITH PULSE DETONATION COMBUSTION
2y 6m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+26.2%)
3y 8m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 744 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month