Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/642,609

CELL BOX

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 22, 2024
Priority
Jun 06, 2023 — JP 2023-093397
Examiner
NEWAY, BLAINE GIRMA
Art Unit
3735
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Sharp Display Technology Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
30%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
70%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 30% of cases
30%
Career Allowance Rate
171 granted / 575 resolved
-40.3% vs TC avg
Strong +41% interview lift
Without
With
+40.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
614
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
93.5%
+53.5% vs TC avg
§102
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
§112
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 575 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 7-8, 15-16 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chen (US 2013/0299376). Regarding claim 1, Chen (figs. 3-4) discloses a cell box 212 comprising: a bottom portion defining a bottom surface of a housing space in which a display panel 24 and a protective sheet 23 are housed in an overlapping manner; and a side wall portion defining a side surface of the housing space, wherein the housing space includes a first space in which the display panel 24 is disposed and a second space in which the display panel is not disposed and a part of the protective sheet 23 is disposed, one or more protruding portions 22 protruding into the second space are provided in the bottom portion, the one or more protruding portions 22 each include a first portion extending in a normal direction of the bottom surface and a second portion 2111 more distant from the bottom surface than the first portion is, and the second portion 2111 includes an overhanging portion more overhanging than the first portion when viewed from the normal direction of the bottom surface. Regarding claim 2, Chen further discloses the side wall portion includes a pair of first side walls opposed to each other in a first direction and each extending in a second direction orthogonal to the first direction, and a pair of second side walls opposed to each other in the second direction and each extending in the first direction, and the side surface of the housing space is defined by an inner surface of each of the pair of first side walls and the pair of second side walls facing the housing space (figs. 1-2). Regarding claim 7, Chen further discloses a plurality of the protruding portions 22 being provided in the bottom portion, the housing space includes two of the second spaces, one of the two second spaces is located further on one side than the first space in the first direction, the other of the two second spaces is located further on the other side than the first space in the first direction, one or more first protruding portions which are some of the plurality of protruding portions are provided in one of the two second spaces, one or more second protruding portions which are a remainder of the plurality of protruding portions are provided in the other of the two second spaces, both ends of the first space in the first direction are defined by at least one first protruding portion of the one or more first protruding portions and at least one second protruding portion of the one or more second protruding portions, and both ends of the first space in the second direction are defined by the inner surfaces of the pair of second side walls (paragraph 0014). Regarding claim 8, Chen further discloses positions of the at least one first protruding portion 22 and the at least one second protruding portion 22 are aligned in the second direction (paragraph 0014). Regarding claim 15, Chen further discloses the overhanging portion 2111overhangs at least on a side opposite to the first space (fig. 2). Regarding claim 16, Chen further discloses the overhanging portion 2111 of each of the at least one first protruding portion 22 and the at least one second protruding portion 22 does not overhang toward the first space. Regarding claim 18, Chen further discloses the display panel 24 and the protective sheet 23 being alternately housed in an overlapping manner in the housing space, the part of the protective sheet 23 is formed with a hole larger than a corresponding one of the one or more protruding portion 22 when viewed from the normal direction of the bottom surface, and the corresponding one of the one or more protruding portion 22 is inserted into the hole of the protective sheet 23 (fig. 3). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 9-14 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen (US 2013/0299376). Regarding claims 9-10, it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. In re Japikse, 86 USPQ 70. Regarding claims 11-14, Chen further discloses a plurality of the protruding portions 22 are provided in the bottom portion, the first space is surrounded by the second space, one or more first protruding portions which are some of the plurality of protruding portions are provided in a portion of the second space further on one side than the first space in the first direction, one or more second protruding portions which are another part of the plurality of protruding portions are provided in a portion of the second space further on the other side than the first space in the first direction, one or more third protruding portions which are another part of the plurality of protruding portions are provided in a portion of the second space further on one side than the first space in the second direction, one or more fourth protruding portions which are a remainder of the plurality of protruding portions are provided in a portion of the second space further on the other side than the first space in the second direction, both ends of the first space in the first direction are defined by at least one first protruding portion of the one or more first protruding portions and at least one second protruding portion of the one or more second protruding portions, and both ends of the first space in the second direction are defined by at least one third protruding portion of the one or more third protruding portions and at least one fourth protruding portion of the one or more fourth protruding portions. Regarding the exact locations of the protruding portions 22, it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. In re Japikse, 86 USPQ 70. Regarding claim 17, Chen further discloses the overhanging portion of each of the at least one first protruding portion 22, the at least one second protruding portion 22, the at least one third protruding portion 22, and the at least one fourth protruding portion 22 does not overhang toward the first space (fig. 4). Claims 3-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen (US 2013/0299376) in view of Glacki (US 12,441,531). Regarding claims 3-6, Chen discloses all elements of the claimed invention except for: one or more recessed portions recessed to a side opposite to the housing space are formed on the inner surface of at least one side wall of the pair of first side walls and the pair of second side walls, and when a portion of the inner surface in which none of the one or more recessed portions is formed is referred to as a main portion of the inner surface, both ends of the first space in the first direction are defined by the main portions of the inner surfaces of the pair of first side walls, and both ends of the first space in the second direction are defined by the main portions of the inner surfaces of the pair of second side walls; wherein the housing space includes one or more of the second spaces defined by each of one or more specific recessed portions among the one or more recessed portions, and the one or more protruding portions protruding toward each of the one or more second spaces are provided in the bottom portion; a specific recessed portion among the one or more specific recessed portions is formed in a central portion of each of the pair of first side walls in the second direction; and wherein a specific recessed portion among the one or more specific recessed portions is formed further on one side of each of the pair of first side walls than a central portion of each of the pair of first side walls in the second direction and further on the other side of each of the pair of first side walls than the central portion of each of the pair of first side walls in the second direction. However, Glacki teaches a package for flat substrates having recessed portions as claimed, defined by centering aids 400 (figs. 1-2). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed, to have provided the device of Chen recessed portions defined by centering aids, to contribute to the stabilization of the panels, as taught by Glacki in col. 8, lines 42-43. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BLAINE GIRMA NEWAY whose telephone number is (571)270-5275. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9:00 AM- 5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony Stashick can be reached at 571-272-4561. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BLAINE G NEWAY/Examiner, Art Unit 3735 /Anthony D Stashick/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3735
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 22, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12623820
Container Cap and Method of Piercing a Seal Covering an Opening of a Container
6y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12359771
PRESSURE TANK
5y 12m to grant Granted Jul 15, 2025
Patent 12274669
ADMINISTRATION METHODS FOR ORAL MEDICATIONS
9y 1m to grant Granted Apr 15, 2025
Patent 12269673
FREIGHT CONTAINER INTENDED TO BE RECEIVED IN THE CARGO HOLD OF AN AIRCRAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 08, 2025
Patent 12179963
GASKETLESS CLOSURE FOR OPEN-TOP PAILS
3y 2m to grant Granted Dec 31, 2024
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
30%
Grant Probability
70%
With Interview (+40.6%)
4y 0m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 575 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month