Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/648,169

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Apr 26, 2024
Priority
Aug 25, 2020 — JP 2020-141973 +1 more
Examiner
KIM, JAY C
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
49%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
71%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 49% of resolved cases
49%
Career Allowance Rate
430 granted / 872 resolved
-10.7% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
62 currently pending
Career history
929
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
40.8%
+0.8% vs TC avg
§102
13.9%
-26.1% vs TC avg
§112
43.7%
+3.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 872 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to Application filed April 26, 2024. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicants’ election without traverse of Species I drawn to the embodiment shown in Fig. 2 of current application, claims 1-3, in the reply filed on August 14, 2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. (1) Regarding claim 1, it is not clear what “a semiconductor laminated structure” recited on line 2 refers to, because (a) the term “a semiconductor laminated structure” per se can be broadly interpreted, (b) however, Applicants do not claim “a semiconductor laminated structure” per se, but further claim that “a ratio of a thickness of the semiconductor laminated structure with respect to the gate length is 4.0 or less” on lines 9-10, (c) the transitional phrase “including” recited on line 2 does not preclude presence of another layer or other layers included in the semiconductor laminated structure in addition to the claimed electron transit layer and the electron supplying layer recited on lines 2-3, and (d) therefore, the limitation “a ratio of a thickness of the semiconductor laminated structure with respect to the gate length is 4.0 or less” recited on lines 9-10 may or may not be met by a single semiconductor device depending on what “a semiconductor laminated structure” includes, and whether the semiconductor laminated structure consists of the electron transit layer and the electron supplying layer or the semiconductor structure includes the electron transit layer, the electron supplying layer and another layer or other layers such as (i) a p-GaN gate layer, (ii) an AlN insertion layer disposed between the electron transit layer and the electron supplying layer to improve density of a two-dimensional electron gas generated inside the electron transit layer, (iii) another or second electron supplying layer formed of AlGaN to improve density of a two-dimensional electron gas generated inside the electron transit layer, and so on. (2) Further regarding claim 1, it is not clear what “a gate length” recited on line 8 refers to, because (a) the term “a gate length” per se can be broadly interpreted, (b) however, Applicants do not claim “a gate length” per se, but further claim that “a ratio of a thickness of the semiconductor laminated structure with respect to the gate length is 4.0 or less” on lines 9-10, (c) as shown in Fig. 2 of current application, the gate electrode has a T-shape, which has at least two gate lengths including the Lg and the largest length of the gate electrode measured at the top surface of the gate electrode, which is longer than the Lg shown in Fig. 2 of current application, and (d) therefore, the limitation “a ratio of a thickness of the semiconductor laminated structure with respect to the gate length is 4.0 or less” recited on lines 9-10 may or may not be met by a single semiconductor device depending on what “a gate length” refers to since (i) there are at least two gate lengths shown in Fig. 2 of current application, and (ii) therefore, there are at least two ratios “of a thickness of the semiconductor laminated structure with respect to the gate length” even if arguendo there is only one thickness of the semiconductor laminated structure. Claims 2 and 3 depend on claim 1, and therefore, claims 2 and 3 are also indefinite. (3) Regarding claim 3, it is not clear what the limitation “he buffer layer having an Al composition x which is 0.2 or higher” recited on lines 2-3 suggests, because (a) it is not clear what “an Al composition x” refers to since Applicants do not claim any formula including “Al” and “x”, and (b) therefore, it is not clear whether the buffer layer is formed of, for example, AlxN, AlxGa1-xN, AlxIn1-xN, AlxAs, GaN:Alx or GaN doped with Al, etc. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, as best understood, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or (a)(2) as being anticipated by Inoue et al. (US 2009/0045438) Regarding claims 1-3, Inoue et al. disclose a method for manufacturing a semiconductor device (Fig. 2) comprising: forming a semiconductor laminated structure (composite structure of 4 and 5), including an electron transit layer (4) and an electron supplying layer (5), above an AIN substrate (2 or composite structure of 1 and 2), because (a) Merriam-Webster dictionary defines “substrate” as “an underlying support”, and therefore, the AlN Nucleation Layer 2 can be referred to as a substrate since it supports the semiconductor layer stack deposited on it, and (b) in addition, “an AlN substrate” can be interpreted as a substrate comprising AlN, in which case the composite structure of the Substrate 1 and the AlN Nucleation Layer 2 can be referred to as “an AlN substrate” just like (i) a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate can be referred to as a silicon substrate, and (ii) a silicon substrate covered with a native oxide can be referred to as a silicon substrate; forming a gate electrode (8), a source electrode (6), and a drain electrode (7) above the electron supply layer, wherein the electron transit layer is located at a lowermost position of the semiconductor laminated structure, the gate electrode has a gate length of 0.3 µm or less ([0059], [0062], [0302], [0323] and [0345]), and a ratio of a thickness of the semiconductor laminated structure (composite structure of 4 and 5) with respect to the gate length of the gate electrode is 4.0 or less ([0043]), because (a) Inoue et al. disclose that “an aspect ratio Lg/a of an active layer thickness a, which is defined as a total of a film thickness of the electron supply layer and a film thickness of the channel layer under the gate electrode, to a gate length Lg fulfills Lg/a≥5” in paragraph [0043] and in numerous other parts of the same patent publication of Inoue et al., (b) therefore, the claimed “ratio of a thickness of the semiconductor laminated structure with respect to the gate length of the gate electrode” would be expressed as “a/Lg” in Inoue et al., which would be ≤ 0.2 when “Lg/a≥5”, and (c) the ratio of “a/Lg” ≤ 0.2 is included in the claimed range of “4.0 or less” recited on lines 9-10 (claim 1), further comprising: forming a buffer layer (3) above the substrate (2 or composite structure of 1 and 2) before the forming the semiconductor laminated structure (composite structure of 4 and 5), wherein the forming the semiconductor laminated structure forms the semiconductor laminated structure on the buffer layer (claim 2), wherein the forming the buffer layer (3) forms the buffer layer having an Al composition x which is 0.2 or higher (Fig. 8), because (a) this limitation is indefinite as discussed above under 35 USC 112(b) rejections, and (b) Applicants do not claim whether the buffer layer has a uniform material composition (claim 3). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Inoue et al. (US 9,954,087) Miyamoto et al. (US 7,863,648) Tamai et al. (US 2009/0212324) Nakata (US 10,790,385) Endoh (US 9,000,488) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAY C KIM whose telephone number is (571) 270-1620. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 AM - 6:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Benitez can be reached at (571) 270-135. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAY C KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2815 /J. K./Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2815 August 28, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 26, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751014
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12727185
HEMT TRANSISTOR OF THE NORMALLY OFF TYPE INCLUDING A TRENCH CONTAINING A GATE REGION AND FORMING AT LEAST ONE STEP, AND CORRESPONDING MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12720889
IMAGING DEVICE, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12707762
METHODS AND DEVICES FOR SOLID STATE NANOWIRE DEVICES
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12696697
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
49%
Grant Probability
71%
With Interview (+21.6%)
3y 6m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 872 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month