Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/651,235

MOTOR DRIVER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 30, 2024
Examiner
DINH, THAI T
Art Unit
2846
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
DENSO CORPORATION
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
558 granted / 651 resolved
+17.7% vs TC avg
Minimal -0% lift
Without
With
+-0.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
678
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.4%
+9.4% vs TC avg
§102
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
§112
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 651 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Oda (JP 2017-118641 A) in view of Uryu et al. (hereinafter Uryu, US 2019/0308657 A1). For claim 1, Oda discloses a motor driver (Fig. 1 of Oda discloses a motor driver PSA – see Oda, Fig. 1, paragraphs [0019]-[0021]) comprising: an inverter including pairs of an upper-arm switching element and a lower-arm switching element, the pairs of the upper-arm switching element and the lower-arm switching element being provided for respective phases of a multiphase motor, the upper-arm switching element and the lower-arm switching element being connected in series between a ground line and a power supply line, the power supply line being connected to a battery, the inverter configured to supply converted power to the multiphase motor by converting direct current power of the battery (Fig. 1 of Oda discloses an inverter “INV” including pairs of an upper-arm switching element (Sup, Svp and Swp) and a lower-arm switching element (Sun, Svn and Swn), the pairs of the upper-arm switching element and the lower-arm switching element being provided for respective phases (u, v and w) of a multiphase motor 34, the upper-arm switching element (Sup, Svp and Swp) and the lower-arm switching element (Sun, Svn and Swn) being connected in series between a ground line and a power supply line, the power supply line being connected to a battery 40, the inverter “INV” configured to supply converted power to the multiphase motor 34 by converting direct current power of the battery 40 – see Oda, Fig. 1, paragraphs [0022]-[0023]); a multiphase pre-driver circuit configured to be powered by a voltage supplied from the battery (Figs. 1-2 of Oda discloses IC 60, capacitor 108 and 112 which all together constitute a multiphase pre-driver circuit 60, 108, 112 configured to be powered by a voltage supplied from the battery 40 – see Oda, Figs. 1-2, paragraphs [0026]-[0028] and [0031]); a controller configured to control electrical conduction from the inverter to the multiphase motor via transmission of a drive signal to the multiphase pre-driver circuit (Figs. 1-2 of Oda disclose a controller 52 configured to control electrical conduction from the inverter “INV”to the multiphase motor 34 via transmission of a drive signal to the multiphase pre-driver circuit – see Oda, Figs. 1-2, paragraphs [0023] and [0025]-[0026]; and motor relays being semiconductor switching elements corresponding to the respective phases, each of which is configured to be turned off to interrupt a current flowing from the multiphase motor to the inverter, each of the motor relays being connected between an inter-arm connection node and a corresponding one of phase windings of the multiphase motor, the inter-arm connection node being a connection node between the upper-arm switching element and the lower-arm switching element (Fig. 1 of Oda discloses motor relays RL being semiconductor switching elements corresponding to the respective phases (u, v, w), each of which is configured to be turned off to interrupt a current flowing from the multiphase motor 34 to the inverter “INV”, each of the motor relays RL being connected between an inter-arm connection node and a corresponding one of phase windings (u, v, w) of the multiphase motor 34, the inter-arm connection node being a connection node between the upper-arm switching element (Sup, Svp and Swp) and the lower-arm switching element (Sun, Svn and Swn) – see Oda, Fig. 1, paragraphs [0011], [0022], [0024], [0026], [0030] and [0036]), wherein: the multiphase pre-driver circuit includes a charge pump configured to boost a voltage of the battery (Fig. 2 of Oda discloses the multiphase pre-driver circuit 50 includes a charge pump 100 configured to boost a voltage of the battery 40 – see Oda, Fig. 2, paragraph [0031]); an output end of the charge pump is connected to respective gates of the motor relays corresponding to the respective phases of the multiphase motor (Figs. 1-2 of Oda disclose an output end of the charge pump 100 is connected to respective gates of the motor relays via signal Msr corresponding to the respective phases (u, v, w) of the multiphase motor 34 – see Oda, Figs. 1-2, paragraphs [0031]-[0035]) and the motor relays are configured to be continuously turned on by an output voltage of the charge pump during an operation of the charge pump unless the controller provides an instruction to turn off the motor relays (see Oda, Figs. 1-2, paragraphs [0033]-[0036]). Oda discloses control device powered by a voltage supplied from the battery to drive the pairs of the upper-arm switching element and the lower-arm switching element included in the inverter (Figs. 1-2 of Oda discloses control device 50 including controller 52 powered by a voltage VL supplied from the battery 40 via step-up/step-down circuit 70 and linear regulator 84 to drive the pairs of the upper-arm switching element (Sup, Svp and Swp) and the lower-arm switching element (Sun, Svn and Swn) included in the inverter “INV” – see Oda, Figs. 1-2, paragraphs [0026]-[0029]). Oda is silent for disclosing a multiphase pre-driver circuit configured to be powered by a voltage supplied from the battery to drive the pairs of the upper-arm switching element and the lower-arm switching element included in the inverter. However, Uryu discloses a multiphase pre-driver circuit configured to be powered by a voltage supplied from the battery to drive the pairs of the upper-arm switching element and the lower-arm switching element included in the inverter (Fig. 7 of Uryu discloses a multiphase pre-driver circuit 130/140 configured to be powered by a voltage supplied from the battery 170 to drive the pairs of the upper-arm switching element (FET1-FET2/FET1B-FET3B) and the lower-arm switching element (FET4-FET6/FET4B/FET6B) included in the inverter 121A/121B – see Uryu, Fig. 7, paragraphs [0045]-[0047]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify teaching of Oda to incorporate teaching of Uryo for purpose of performing specific functions and achieving better control. Claims 2 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Oda (JP 2017-118641 A) in view of Uryu et al. (hereinafter Uryu, US 2019/0308657 A1), further in view of Nakagawa (US 2018/0138811 A1). For claim 2, Oda in view of Uryu disclose all limitations as applited to claim 1 above. Oda and Uryu are silent for disclosing at least one gate interruption switch configured to interrupt the output voltage supplied from the output end of the charge pump to the respective gates of the motor relays, in response to receiving an interruption signal as the instruction being provided from the controller. However, Nakagawa discloses at least one gate interruption switch configured to interrupt the output voltage supplied from the output end of the charge pump to the respective gates of the motor relays, in response to receiving an interruption signal as the instruction being provided from the controller (Figs. 1 and 6 of Nakagawa discloses at least one gate interruption switch 17 configured to interrupt the output voltage supplied from the output end of the charge pump 16 to the respective gates of the motor relays 18, in response to receiving an interruption signal IN– see Nakagawa, Figs. 1 and 6, paragraphs [0021], [0025]-[0026] and [0054]-[0057]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify Oda’ control device 50 to include at least one gate interruption switch 17 to interrupt the output voltage supplied from the output end of the charge pump 16 to the respective gates of the motor relays 18 as teaching of Nakagawa, , in response to receiving an interruption signal IN as the instruction being provided from Oda’s controller 52 for purpose of increasing reliability. For claim 3, Oda in view of Uryu, further in view of Nakagawa disclose the motor driver according to claim 2, wherein: the at least one gate interruption switch is at least one of gate interruption switches (Figs. 1 and 6 of Nakagawa disclose the at least one gate interruption switch 17 which is at least one of gate interruption switches 92-95 – see Nakagawa, Figs. 1 and 6, paragraphs [0055]-[0056]); the gate interruption switches are provided for the respective phases of the multiphase motor (Figs. 1-2 of Oda in view of Uryu, further in view of Nakagawa disclose Nakagawa’s the gate interruption switches 92-95 which are provided for the respective phases of Oda’s the multiphase motor 34 via Oda’s motor relay RL/Nakagawa’s motor relay 18 – see Oda, Figs. 1-2, paragraphs [0026] and see Nakagawa, Figs. 1 and 6, paragraphs [0025]-[0026] and [0054]-[0057]); and the gate interruption switches are configured to interrupt the output voltage supplied from the output end of the charge pump to the respective gates of the motor relays, respectively, based on interruption signals as instructions that are separately provided from the controller and correspond to the respective phases of the multiphase motor (Figs. 1-2 of Oda in view of Uryu, further in view of Nakagawa disclose at least one Nakagawa’s gate interruption switch 17 configured to interrupt the output voltage supplied from the output end of Oda’s the charge pump 100/Nakagawa’s the charge pump 16 to the respective gates of Oda’s The motor relays RL/Nakagawa’s the motor relays 18, in response to receiving Oda’s interruption signal MSr1/ Nakagawa’s interruption IN as the instruction being provided from Oda’s controller 52 – see Oda, Figs. 1-2, paragraphs [0026]; and see Nakagawa, Figs. 1 and 6, paragraphs [0021], [0025]-[0026] and [0054]-[0057]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THAI T DINH whose telephone number is (571)270-3852. The examiner can normally be reached (571)270-3852. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, EDUARDO COLON-SANTANA can be reached at (571)272-2060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THAI T DINH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2846
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 30, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 15, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592660
DRIVING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587113
METHOD FOR PROVIDING A VOLTAGE FOR A LOAD, AND DEVICE FOR CARRYING OUT A METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576977
AIRCRAFT PROPULSION SYSTEM WITH ENGINE RATINGS AS A FUNCTION OF SYSTEM COMPONENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580509
AN IMPROVED SYNCHRONIZED DUAL ACTIVE BRIDGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570011
ROBOTIC MANIPULATOR ARM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (-0.1%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 651 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month