Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/652,038

Method For Generating Haptic Feedback

Non-Final OA §101§102
Filed
May 01, 2024
Examiner
BELOUSOV, ANDREY
Art Unit
2172
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
411 granted / 594 resolved
+14.2% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+26.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
627
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
53.9%
+13.9% vs TC avg
§102
31.4%
-8.6% vs TC avg
§112
8.7%
-31.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 594 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102
DETAILED ACTION This action is responsive to the filing of 5/1/24. Claims 1-20 are pending and have been considered below. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-9 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner's statement of reasons for allowance. The prior art of record fails to disclose before generating haptic feedback, using an audio sample to determine whether to trigger the haptic feedback in the future, and storing haptic record representing the audio sample, in combination with other limitations recited within the claimed context. The claims present a combination of limitations that differ from the cited art, and there is no reasonable combination of references that would teach it. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim 19 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. Claim 19 recites a “computer-readable signal” comprising. This encompasses nonstatutory subject matter (transmission media) that is unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. Claim 20 recites a computer program. Accordingly, the recited “computer program” is a computer software per se and is not a “process,” a “machine,” a “manufacture” or a “composition of matter,” as defined in 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 10-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Doy (20190311590.) Claim 1, 17-20: Doy discloses a computer-implemented method for generating haptic feedback to accompany an audio signal, the method comprising: detecting a predetermined audio signal in one or more monitored audio channels (par. 54, receive the audio signal A.sub.IN and to determine whether the audio signal A.sub.IN comprises a haptic trigger based on an indication of a rate of change of an amplitude of the audio signal A.sub.IN. A haptic trigger may be considered a part of the audio signal which has a certain characteristic indicating that it is suitable for output in conjunction with a haptic signal); and in response to detecting the predetermined audio signal, triggering a haptic feedback signal in a haptic feedback channel, wherein the haptic feedback channel (Fig. 4B: 414 haptic triggers over the Hout in Fig. 5: 502 to 208 to 201 haptic transducer; par. 81-84) is synchronized (par. 86, a fast reacting decision stage, which may therefore provide a haptic signal quickly, thereby maintaining synchronization with the audio signal) with the one or more monitored audio channels (Fig. 4B: 408.) Claim 10: Doy discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein the haptic feedback signal comprises an audio signal (par. 54, A haptic trigger may be considered a part of the audio signal which has a certain characteristic indicating that it is suitable for output in conjunction with a haptic signal.) Claim 11: Doy discloses the method according to claim 1, further comprising determining the haptic feedback signal based on the predetermined audio signal (par. 54, receive the audio signal A.sub.IN and to determine whether the audio signal A.sub.IN comprises a haptic trigger based on an indication of a rate of change of an amplitude of the audio signal A.sub.IN.) Claim 12: Doy discloses the method according to claim 11, wherein determining the haptic feedback signal comprises selecting the haptic feedback signal from a plurality of predetermined haptic feedback signals based on the predetermined audio signal (Fig. 4a-4b 402, 404, 406; par. 64-66, a first weighted sum representation 402 of a rectified version 401 of the audio signal; a second weighted sum representation 404 of the rectified version 401 of the audio signal.) Claim 13: Doy discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein: detecting the predetermined audio signal comprises detecting the predetermined audio signal with at least one of a range of amplitudes (Fig. 4a: 400; par. 54, an indication of a rate of change of an amplitude of the audio signal), durations, or occurrence frequencies; and the method further comprises adjusting a characteristic of the haptic feedback signal based on the at least one amplitude, duration, or occurrence frequency of the predetermined audio signal (par. 55, if the rate of change of the amplitude of the audio signal is above a first threshold value, such rate of change may indicate that an audio event is occurring in the audio signal A.sub.IN that may warrant a haptic event.) Claim 14: Doy discloses the method according to claim 1, further comprising: obtaining haptic feedback capability information from a device configured to receive the haptic feedback channel; and triggering the haptic feedback signal based on the haptic feedback capability information (par. 58, the first type of haptic signal may comprise buzzes or Piece Wise Linear Envelope (PWLE) type waveforms, which are examples of simple and efficient methods of storing a haptics waveform; par. 59, a haptic signal of the second type may comprise a ‘more aggressive or ‘click’ style waveform, stored in the device (or memory) as a wave file consisting of discrete sampled data.) Claim 15: Doy discloses a method of generating audio-visual media with feedback, the method comprising: generating base audio-visual media comprising an audio signal and a video signal; and performing the method according claim 1 to generate haptic feedback to accompany the base audio-visual media (par. 20, The media playback may comprise video data.) Claim 16: Doy discloses the method according to claim 15, further comprising: detecting a predetermined video signal in one or more monitored video channels; and in response to detecting the predetermined video signal, triggering a haptic feedback signal in a haptic feedback channel, wherein the haptic feedback channel is synchronized with the one or more monitored video channels (par. 94, the audio signal may be played along with some video data, for example for a gaming application; the gaming content is for a military based game, the criteria may be adjusted to differentiate between gunshots represented by “on-screen” images (for example a muzzle flash) in the video data and “off-screen” gunshots not represented by images in the video data. The criteria utilized to generate the haptics signal may therefore be adjusted to produce different haptic signals for these two scenarios.) Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Eagleman (20210208684) haptic feedback. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREY BELOUSOV whose telephone number is (571) 270-1695 and Andrew.belousov@uspto.gov email. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Friday EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Adam Queler, can be reached at telephone number 571-272-4140. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center and the Private Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center or Private PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center and Private PAIR for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. /Andrey Belousov/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2172 2/5/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 01, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602533
CONTENT GENERATION WITH INTEGRATED AUTOFORMATTING IN WORD PROCESSORS THAT DEPLOY LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12585372
GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE SYSTEM GUIDE MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586829
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING ROLL MAP AND MANUFACTURING BATTERY USING ROLL MAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12564733
METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING TREATMENT TIME AND PLAN QUALITY FOR RADIOTHERAPY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12536210
AUTOMATED CONTENT CREATION AND CONTENT SERVICES FOR COLLABORATION PLATFORMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+26.6%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 594 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month