Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/652,633

INJECTOR APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DRUG DELIVERY

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
May 01, 2024
Priority
Aug 05, 2010 — provisional 61/371,169 +12 more
Examiner
AHMED, TASNIM M
Art Unit
3783
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Forsight Vision4 Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
358 granted / 442 resolved
+11.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
467
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
64.5%
+24.5% vs TC avg
§102
13.3%
-26.7% vs TC avg
§112
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 442 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of the invention restriction of 12 February 2026 in the reply filed on 11 May 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 17-35 are pending, with Groups I, II, and III (claims 17-21) being withdrawn from consideration. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 22-26 and 29-30 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 20-21, 23, 25-26, 30, and 36-37 of U.S. Patent No. 11,786,396 in view of Breegi et al (US 2004/0230183). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the patent claims anticipate the instant claims as detailed below: Instant Patent 22. A method for injecting a therapeutic agent into an ocular implant at least partially implanted in an eye of a patient, the method comprising: advancing at least one needle into the eye, the at least one needle comprising: an injection lumen; an outlet lumen surrounding at least a portion of the injection lumen; and a receiver chamber fluidly coupled to the outlet lumen; injecting a therapeutic agent into the ocular implant through the injection lumen; and displacing pre-existing fluid in the ocular implant through the outlet lumen into the receiver chamber as therapeutic agent is injected into the ocular implant through the injection lumen. 20. An injector for injecting a therapeutic agent into an ocular implant at least partially implanted in an eye, the injector comprising: an injection lumen having a first opening, the injection lumen configured to provide a pathway for injecting a therapeutic agent from the injection lumen through the first opening into the ocular implant using positive pressure applied through the injection lumen; an outlet lumen configured to provide a pathway through which a first amount of pre-existing liquid in the ocular implant exits the ocular implant as therapeutic agent is injected into the ocular implant through the first opening from the injection lumen, wherein the injection lumen is in a fixed position relative to the outlet lumen such that the first opening from the injection lumen is located distal to the outlet lumen; a receiver chamber fluidly coupled to the outlet lumen, the receiver chamber comprises a vent to pass air that is fluidly coupled to the outlet lumen so as to define a vent path, wherein injection of the therapeutic agent into the ocular implant via the injection lumen through the distal opening upon application of the positive pressure through the injection lumen displaces the first amount of pre-existing liquid in the ocular implant into the receiver chamber via the outlet lumen, wherein the vent path comprises no substantial resistance to flow as the therapeutic agent is injected into the ocular implant through the injection lumen. The patent claim discloses all of the elements of the claim but is silent regarding “advancing at least one needle into the eye.” However, Breegi teaches an ocular injector (31, Fig. 3), thus being in the same field of endeavor, which advances a needle (¶0045) to reach the therapeutic target area. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the patent claims to incorporate a step of advancing an ocular needle as taught by Breegi in order to provide a sufficient way of reaching a target therapeutic area. 22. A method for injecting a therapeutic agent into an ocular implant at least partially implanted in an eye of a patient, the method comprising: advancing at least one needle into the eye, the at least one needle comprising: an injection lumen; an outlet lumen surrounding at least a portion of the injection lumen; and a receiver chamber fluidly coupled to the outlet lumen; injecting a therapeutic agent into the ocular implant through the injection lumen; and displacing pre-existing fluid in the ocular implant through the outlet lumen into the receiver chamber as therapeutic agent is injected into the ocular implant through the injection lumen. 37. An injector for injecting a therapeutic agent into an ocular implant at least partially implanted in an eye, the injector comprising: a cartridge having at least one needle defining an injection lumen, the injection lumen having a first opening, the injection lumen configured to provide a pathway for injecting a therapeutic agent from the injection lumen through the first opening into the ocular implant using positive pressure applied through the injection lumen; an outlet lumen configured to provide a pathway through which a first amount of pre-existing liquid in the ocular implant exits the ocular implant as therapeutic agent is injected into the ocular implant through the first opening from the injection lumen, wherein the injection lumen is in a fixed position relative to the outlet lumen such that the first opening from the injection lumen is located distal to the outlet lumen; a receiver chamber fluidly coupled to the outlet lumen, wherein injection of the therapeutic agent into the ocular implant via the injection lumen through the distal opening upon application of the positive pressure through the injection lumen displaces the first amount of pre-existing liquid in the ocular implant into the receiver chamber via the outlet lumen. The patent claim discloses all of the elements of the claim but is silent regarding “advancing at least one needle into the eye.” However, Breegi teaches an ocular injector (31, Fig. 3), thus being in the same field of endeavor, which advances a needle (¶0045) to reach the therapeutic target area. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the patent claims to incorporate a step of advancing an ocular needle as taught by Breegi in order to provide a sufficient way of reaching a target therapeutic area. Instant 23 24 25 26 29 30 Patent 21 25 26 30 36 23 Allowable Subject Matter Claims 27-28 and 31-35 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TASNIM M AHMED whose telephone number is (571)272-9536. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm Pacific time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bhisma Mehta can be reached at (571)272-3383. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TASNIM MEHJABIN AHMED/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 01, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12661448
INJECTION SYSTEM AND METHOD
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12636425
REMOTE-CONTROL DEFECATION DEVICE FOR DISABLED CONSTIPATION PATIENTS
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629480
ADAPTER AND INJECTION SYRINGE
3y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12616794
Medical Container, Such as a Pre-fillable or Prefilled Syringe, Comprising a RFID Tag for Remote Identification of Said Medical Container
3y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12616800
MEDICAMENT DELIVERY MEMBER GUARD LOCK ASSEMBLY
3y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+5.2%)
2y 9m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 442 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month