Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/654,618

LOW RESISTANCE STAIRCASE RIVET CONTACT USING METAL-TO-METAL STRAP CONNECTION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 03, 2024
Priority
May 11, 2023 — provisional 63/465,663
Examiner
GREEN, TELLY D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Micron Technology Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1070 granted / 1307 resolved
+21.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
59 currently pending
Career history
1360
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
56.1%
+16.1% vs TC avg
§102
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§112
12.4%
-27.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1307 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention II, claims 8-20, in the reply filed on July 21, 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 1-7 have been cancelled by the Applicant. Action on the merits is as follows: Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 8-10, 12-18 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Mushiga et al. (Mushiga) (US 2019/0252396 A1). In regards to claim 8, Mushiga (Figs. 27A, 28C, 28F, 52A-52G and associated text/equivalent items) discloses an apparatus (Figs. 28A, 52A, item 1000), comprising: a stack of materials (items 132 plus 146 or 232 plus 246) comprising a plurality of layers (items 132, 146 or 232, 246), the plurality of layers (items 132, 146, 232, 246) alternating between a first material (insulating/dielectric material, paragraphs 119, 162) and a second material (electrically conductive material, paragraphs 186, 250), the second material (electrically conductive material, paragraphs 186, 250) comprising a first metallic material (paragraph 250, TiN, TaN, WN W, Co, Mo, and/or Cu or TiN, TaN, and/or WN plus W, Co, Mo, and/or Cu), the stack of materials (items 132 plus 146 or 232 plus 246) comprising a cavity (item 85) at least partially filled with a third material (air or material of item 86A or 86B, [Examiner notes that air is a material because it is a form of matter that has mass and takes up space]), wherein a bottom of the cavity (item 85) is in contact with a layer of the plurality of layers of the second material (electrically conductive material, paragraphs 186, 250, items 146, 246); and a contact (item 86) extending at least partially through the stack of materials (items 132 plus 146 or 232 plus 246) and at least partially within the cavity (item 85), the contact (item 86 or 86B) comprising a second metallic material (paragraph 197, TiN, tungsten, cobalt, molybdenum, or copper) that is in contact with the first metallic material (paragraph 250, TiN, TaN, and/or WN plus W, Co, Mo, and/or Cu) of the layer of the plurality of layers (items 132, 146, 232, 246). What is the third material? In regards to claims 9 and 17, Mushiga (Figs. 27A, 28C, 28F, 52A-52G and associated text/equivalent items) discloses wherein the contact (item 86 or 86B) is lined with the second metallic material (item 86A, TiN). In regards to claims 10 and 18, Mushiga (Figs. 27A, 28C, 28F, 52A-52G and associated text/equivalent items) discloses wherein the contact (item 86) is at least partially filled with a third metallic material (item 86B, paragraph 197, tungsten, cobalt, molybdenum, or copper). In regards to claims 12 and 20, Mushiga (Figs. 27A, 28C, 28F, 52A-52G and associated text/equivalent items) discloses wherein the contact (item 86) extends through each layer of the plurality of layers (items 132, 146 or 232, 246) of the stack of materials (items 132 plus 146 or 232 plus 246). In regards to claim 13, Mushiga (Figs. 27A, 28C, 28F, 52A-52G and associated text/equivalent items) discloses wherein the contact (item 86) extends partially through the stack of materials (items 132 plus 146 or 232 plus 246) to a depth of the layer of the plurality of layers (items 132, 146 or 232, 246). In regards to claim 14, Mushiga (Figs. 27A, 28C, 28F, 52A-52G and associated text/equivalent items) discloses wherein the second metallic material comprises Molybdenum (paragraph 197, TiN, tungsten, cobalt, molybdenum, or copper). In regards to claim 15, Mushiga (Figs. 27A, 28C, 28F, 52A-52G and associated text/equivalent items) discloses wherein the first metallic material (paragraph 250, TiN, TaN, WN W, Co, Mo, and/or Cu or TiN, TaN, and/or WN plus W, Co, Mo, and/or Cu) of the layer of the plurality of layers (items 132, 146 or 232, 246) forms a plurality of word lines (paragraph 203) each coupled with respective pluralities of memory cells (paragraph 211, 268). In regards to claim 16, Mushiga (Figs. 27A, 28C, 28F, 52A-52G and associated text/equivalent items) discloses an apparatus (Figs. 28A, 52A, item 1000), comprising: a stack of materials (items 132 plus 146 or 232 plus 246) comprising a plurality of layers (items 132, 146, 232, 246) comprising a first material (insulating/dielectric material, paragraphs 119, 162) and a second material (electrically conductive material, paragraphs 186, 250), the second material (electrically conductive material, paragraphs 186, 250) comprising a first metallic material (paragraph 250, TiN, TaN, WN W, Co, Mo, and/or Cu or TiN, TaN, and/or WN plus W, Co, Mo, and/or Cu), the stack of materials (items 132 plus 146 or 232 plus 246) comprising a cavity (item 85) at least partially filled with a third material (air or material of item 86A or 86B, [Examiner notes that air is a material because it is a form of matter that has mass and takes up space]), wherein a bottom of the cavity (item 85) is in contact with a layer of the plurality of layers of the second material (electrically conductive material, paragraphs 186, 250, items 146, 246); and a contact (item 86 or 86B) extending at least partially through the stack of materials (items 132 plus 146 or 232 plus 246) and at least partially within the cavity (item 85), the contact (item 86 or 86B) comprising a second metallic material (paragraph 197, TiN, tungsten, cobalt, molybdenum, or copper) that is in contact with the first metallic material (paragraph 250, TiN, TaN, and/or WN plus W, Co, Mo, and/or Cu) of the layer of the plurality of layers (items 132, 146, 232, 246). What is the third material? Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 11 and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mushiga et al. (Mushiga) (US 2019/0252396 A1) in view of Preusse et al. (Preusse) (US 9,620,453 B2). In regards to claims 11 and 19, Mushiga does not specifically disclose wherein the contact is at least partially filled with a fourth material, the fourth material between the third material and the second metallic material. Preusse (Fig. 5 and associated text/items) discloses wherein the contact (items 109 or 108 plus 109) is at least partially filled with a fourth material (items 111 or 201) or , the fourth material (items 111 or 201) between the third material (items 201 or 501) and the second metallic material (items 107, 111). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to incorporate the teachings of Preusse for the purpose of improved adhesion and/or an electrical connection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TELLY D GREEN whose telephone number is (571)270-3204. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jessica Manno can be reached at 571-272-2339. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. TELLY D. GREEN Examiner Art Unit 2898 /TELLY D GREEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2898 August 3, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 03, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12708017
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTI-TIER MULTI-DIE MODULES
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12708050
FABRICATING METHOD OF SEMICONDUCTOR DIE WITH TAPERED SIDEWALL IN PACKAGE
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702058
THREE-DIMENSIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE HAVING A STACKED PASSIVE DEVICE
4y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12702006
Method for Sigulating Semiconductor Devices and Package Device Including the Semiconductor Devices
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12702029
Package Substrate, Semiconductor Device, and Electronic Device
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+3.9%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1307 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month