Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/654,930

DEPOSITION SOURCE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 03, 2024
Priority
May 11, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0061120
Examiner
HASSANZADEH, PARVIZ
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
25%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
59%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 25% of cases
25%
Career Allowance Rate
18 granted / 71 resolved
-34.6% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+33.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
82
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
86.8%
+46.8% vs TC avg
§102
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§112
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 71 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Interpretation Heater module in claim 1 (and its dependent claims 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 12) and claims 17 (and its dependent claims 18-20) does not invoke 112(f) interpretation since the generic placeholder “module” is modified by a sufficient structure (“heater” is an art recognized structure for heating) and furthermore the claim does not explicitly recite the function of “heating”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Doo (KR 102243719) in view of Hwapyeong (KR 20220047417). These references are listed on IDS 1449. English translations are included with Form PTO-892. Regarding claims 1, 12-16 : Doo discloses a deposition source 1 (Figs. 1, 2) comprising a crucible 100 provided with an evaporation material and a plurality of nozzles 110 (Fig. 2) disposed on the crucible and spaced apparat from each other; a heating unit 300 disposed outside the crucible and configured to heat the evaporation material in the crucible in the corresponding position. The heating unit 300 includes an upper heart 310 (upper heater module) and a lower heater 350 (lower heater module) (Fig. 3). A power supply device (not shown) electrically connected to the heating unit 300 via power terminals (electrodes) 710a and 710b (Fig. 4 and its description and abstract). PNG media_image1.png 554 433 media_image1.png Greyscale Doo does not explicitly disclose a housing accommodating the crucible and the nozzles. Hwapyeong discloses a deposition source DS (Fig. 2) including a housing HS accommodating the deposition module DM including a plurality of nozzles NZ. The housing also accommodates heater HT, heater frame HF, radiation protection unit RH. PNG media_image2.png 415 334 media_image2.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the apparatus of Doo to include the housing as taught by Hwapyeong in order to integrate the crucible, heater and protection members in a single unit. Further regarding claim 1 with respect to first and second electrodes connected to upper and lower heaters: Hwapyeong further discloses heater HT comprising individual section HT1, HT2, HT3 and HT4 each connected to an electrode EL (Fig. 7a). Heating element HE connected to electrode EL to an external electrode EE via a connection part ELC (Fig. 7a). The connection part ELC of an exemplary embodiment may have a structure that is flexible to deformation, and may prevent damage to the heating element HE to extend the lifespan of the heater HT. The connection part ELC of one embodiment includes a plurality of metal sheets MP1 as shown in FIG. 7A or a plurality of thin wires MP2 as shown in FIG. 7B. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the apparatus of Doo to include the connecting mechanism from power source to electrode or connecting heater parts (sub-heaters) together instead of curved portion of Doo as taught by Hwapyeong as an obvious alternative mechanism for coupling the heaters to a power source and connecting heater parts (sub-heaters) together. Regarding claims 2-11: Doo discloses the heating unit 300 includes an upper heater 310 (upper heater module) and a lower heater 350 (lower heater module) (Fig. 3). As shown in Fig. 6a, the heater 300a is formed of a series of parallel elements or wires (corresponding to first heater module and second heater module) connected to each other via curved portion A (corresponding to connection part, connecting electrode). Further, it would have been obvious to use the connection mechanism as taught by Hwapyeong for connecting sub-heaters by a plurality of metal sheets MP1 as shown in FIG. 7A or a plurality of thin wires MP2 as shown in FIG. 7B. Alternatively, Hwapyeong further discloses heater HT comprising individual section HT1, HT2, HT3 and HT4 each connected to an EL (Fig. 7a). Heating element HE connected to electrode EL to an external electrode EE via a connection part ELC (Fig. 7a). The connection part ELC of an exemplary embodiment may have a structure that is flexible to deformation, and may prevent damage to the heating element HE to extend the lifespan of the heater HT. The connection part ELC of one embodiment includes a plurality of metal sheets MP1 as shown in FIG. 7A or a plurality of thin wires MP2 as shown in FIG. 7B. PNG media_image3.png 320 374 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 411 237 media_image4.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the apparatus of Doo to use the heaters of Hwapyeong and connecting the heaters by the connecting mechanism as taught by Hwapyeong as an alternative arrangement of heating structure in the apparatus of Doo. An express suggestion to substitute one equivalent component or process for another is not necessary to render such substitution obvious. In re Fout, 675 F.2d 297, 213 USPQ 532 (CCPA 1982). Further regarding claim 6-11: splitting the electrode to multiple sub electrode in order to connect to different ends of the heater unit is considered obvious arrangement for further distribution of power to the heater units. Regarding claim 17-20: Hwapyeong further discloses Each of the plurality of heaters HT1 to HT4 may be independently controlled. For example, the temperature may be ifferently controlled for each heater, and a temperature deviation in the heat generating member HM may be reduced and heated uniformly. The number and positions of the heaters are not limited to the example illustrated in FIG. 6 and may vary depending on the structure of the heating member HM and the size of the crucibles. Hwapyeong (in claim 8) discloses the plurality of heaters are disposed along the inner surface of the heater frame, and the plurality of heaters are each independently controllable (implying by a controller). Hwapyeong further discloses “Meanwhile, although not shown, the heating member HM may further include a temperature sensing unit. The temperature sensing unit may measure the temperature of the first crucible CR1 or the second crucible CR2 for each region. With reference to the temperature measured by the temperature sensor, the temperature of the heater HT may be controlled to make the entire temperature of the crucible uniform.” It has been held that claims directed to apparatus must be distinguished from the prior art in terms of structure rather than function. Also, a claim containing a “recitation with respect to the manner in which a claimed apparatus is intended to be employed does not differentiate the claimed apparatus from a prior art apparatus” if the prior art apparatus teaches all the structural limitations of the claim. This rejection is based on the fact the apparatus structure taught above has the inherent capability of being used in the manner intended by the Applicant. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Hori (US 20160122903) discloses a crucible including a surrounding heater comprising repeated portions 1x, connecting portion 2x, and 3x (Fig.2, [0048]). PNG media_image5.png 349 307 media_image5.png Greyscale Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Parviz Hassanzadeh whose telephone number is (571)272-1435. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alexa Neckel can be reached at 571-272-1446. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PARVIZ HASSANZADEH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1716
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 03, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12660536
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR ETCHING
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12642054
MULTl-STATION TOOL WITH ROTATABLE TOP PLATE ASSEMBLY
3y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12618151
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS
3y 0m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12590373
AQUEOUS COMPOSITION, STAINLESS STEEL SURFACE ROUGHENING METHOD USING SAME, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ROUGHENED STAINLESS STEEL
2y 9m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12581883
ETCHING METHOD AND PLASMA ETCHING APPARATUS
2y 11m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
25%
Grant Probability
59%
With Interview (+33.2%)
3y 9m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 71 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month